Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How much boost/power can you go with 98ULP? I know my RB25 was on the limit at 280kw's, tuner said any more and the valves will start burning, but on E85 it was , "so where you wanna stop here?" , laughs all around it was ridiculous what numbers where being pumped out...

How much boost/power can you go with 98ULP? I know my RB25 was on the limit at 280kw's, tuner said any more and the valves will start burning, but on E85 it was , "so where you wanna stop here?" , laughs all around it was ridiculous what numbers where being pumped out...

I had 445rwkw at 19psi on 98.

Have u had a car with a restricted turbine that caused boost to drop as peters did?

No issues with mine holding boost with a similar size turbine wheel.

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

And yours has got far more power than mine. That is how I expected my graph to look like, the psi is set and once it reaches the limit it remains there.

It is just strange that it drops off before it reaches the 6000rpm where I had the previous problem, but I do not know enough to make a statement, just an observation. This does not mean I am right :/

Also it is not as rich as it was every other time I had a tune , maybe it was a motor safety thing?

Going off the Dyno readings the PSI is dropping off at 150kph, tested it and at 150kph it is 4500rpm in 5th gear. That seems a bit early for it to start to taper off, well to me but I know very little about the workings of turbos/cars etc ??? Oh, and women :yes:

Edited by Nismo 3.2ish

Like you said earlier. You are going round in circles.

If CRD are not answering you then we can only presume that it is due to them not wanting to instead of them not knowing.

And lastly, just take it to someone else if you're not happy. Or are you happy? If you are then just leave the thing.

  • Like 2

Maybe because you said you didn't care about peak power just response they didn't bother making it hold boost.

I do find it hard to believe that they trialled various camshafts for some reason, but never made it hold boost...

Like you said earlier. You are going round in circles.

If CRD are not answering you then we can only presume that it is due to them not wanting to instead of them not knowing.

And lastly, just take it to someone else if you're not happy. Or are you happy? If you are then just leave the thing.

I am not going in circles with what I said, I tested it today to see exactly what RPM the boost started to drop off , now I know and now you know :)

Dont want to know, dont read the shit :)

Take car to Jez

End thread

That is not the end, have to see what happens after it comes back from Jez, I will post the results.

You can all have a laugh at my whinging about the results if it is not better than it was and I will go away with my tail between my legs, THEN , end of thread :yes: :yes:

Similar turbine wheel size, my point being it should hold boost unless they tuned the boost controller to do that or compressor is out of flow which it shouldnt be

Not if there is that much back pressure that it cracks the gate open. But anyway we will see I suppose. Based on everything that has been said it points to the turbo IMHO. But who knows. But most of the time these issue seem to get solved with a bigger turbo. We all have theories, if I am wrong then I have learned something. Edited by XGTRX
  • Like 1

Maybe because you said you didn't care about peak power just response they didn't bother making it hold boost.

I do find it hard to believe that they trialled various camshafts for some reason, but never made it hold boost...

Maybe Ben, got one of the SAU blokes coming up tomorrow and want him to take it for a run and see what he thinks..

I go for a drive most days and love it, went this morning to check out the rpm to kph as it is not displayed and I did not notice the PSI drop off up to 6000rpm, just want to know why, got a few different opinions but it seems my push for answers annoys some blokes :)

Oh, and the only thing I have ever put shit on my X builder was for, NON COMMUNICATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!! and they are like that to the end!!!!!!!!!! hate it :(

You know what I do if I do not like a thread, I do not read it, if no one is interested it dies without being shut down, simple :/

  • Like 1

Ive read most of this thead, but i wouldnt be suprised they made the boost drop off to stop your missfiring issues

Looking forward to seeing further development with a different tuner. Lack of communication is quite frustrating

Get a life Mick,haha

I just cannot help think the same and could be 100% wrong, but the psi dropping from 4500rpm ,fark it only just spooled up, think it would hit 6500rpm before taking a nose dive ?

When I get the next tune maybe I will not even get the same result, it might be 350 - 360awkw, I do not care as long as the top end lose goes down to where I can play :)

Top setting was 22psi before this tune. But running on 22psi it went tits up at around 6000rpm.

Now it went to 24psi @ 4500rpm before it tapered off to 18.5 @ 7000 ( I think the 381.7 kw was around 7k , the private road I used would not let me go to 7k in 5th gear, just squeezed in 4500rpm, too short) Not sure if it is actually set at 24psi, just going off what I can see on the dyno chart before it dropped off.

There is no harm in having a guess at what is going on here and in about a month there might be some answers, could be better, or worse ??????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...