Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seriously. , by writing what I did I'm trying to help you.

It's up to you .

Look at the result of your previous threads and consider my advice along with others.

Man just asking a simple question about a car lol.. not rocket science..

the standard RB26 plenum is pretty damn good.

maybe get it powder coated if you like the look of new stuff under the bonnet.

But really a new plenum won't make a bee's dick's worth of difference to anything except your wallet

  • Like 1

C'mon guys, sometimes it's easier to just either ignore the question and move on or just post a quick reply (or link to previously discussed topic) and again, move on! Bullying people over stupidity is still bullying!

My view- looks good, supposedly helps leaning out of cyl 6, apparently gives minimal performance gains.

Best option? Buy a cheap Freddy off Ebay and put a sticker on it, win!

Edited by Shoota_77
  • Like 1

C'mon guys, sometimes it's easier to just either ignore the question and move on or just post a quick reply (or link to previously discussed topic) and again, move on! Bullying people over stupidity is still bullying!

My view- looks good, supposedly helps leaning out of cyl 6, apparently gives minimal performance gains.

Best option? Buy a cheap Freddy off Ebay and put a sticker on it, win!

Haha ok thanks.. it's seems that the general consensus is it makes no real difference and that money would be better off spent on something else..

The main purpose of the Greddy plenum is to help equalize cylinder flow, the stocky is known to push too much air towards cyl 5 and 6 causing them to run leaner than the other 4.

There is no power to be gained running one, stocky is good for high power builds.

Key point is to run the highest flowing injectors towards the rear to aid the lean issue.

So many people running the stock intake manifold to over 450Kw its not funny.

You suck at Google.

This was at the top first search and all I did was type greddy plenum rb26.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265591-rb26-greddy-plenum-vs-stock-plenum/

Did you read that thread? Its the same old "wives group" shouting the usual and kind of lacking in actual results.

I am not saying they are an upgrade that people should rush out and do...but I have never read a credible back to back like i have with the Nismo plenum and Hypertune plenum.

I am curious and open to it because a mate that I respect who has owned more high HP Skylines than I will ever drive likes running them. And yes the std plenums make good power, but the Greddy item will give different results, different how is the question for me and as above curious....would be nice to read actual results from a semi sensible practical test.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...