Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The engine in my '32 GTR is in need of a rebuild and i've decided to go all out on it (all the goodies, stroker and the like), one of the thing's i've been considering is VCT.

Option 1 for installing VCT would be to grab the kit from Otomoto, which is 3K, plus the required NEO bits, which is around another 650 by all accounts, give or take. Given this is a rebuild most of the other work required would have been done anyway so not really an extra cost there.

However, i've had some suggestions from around the place that perhaps I should buy a Rb25 NEO and swap the heads over. I've not heard of anyone do this, and there would be a number of things to sort out but it may work out significantly cheaper in the end, however there are some things that i'm struggling to get my head around.

From what I understand, the main things that would need to be sorted.

  • Exhaust: i'd be keeping my twin turbo setup, so cylinder 2 and 5 need to be changed, this would best be done by drill+tapping new holes in the head, correct?
  • Cam covers: swap over all my 26 stuff, does it all bolt on? Obviously the timing belt cover would need some adjustments, have some ideas with that.
  • VCT oil feed. As i understand this, the 26 block would have the same issues as doing a VCT on a 30 block so i could use the solutions used there, which is an external feed as i understand it, however i've also seen some info on people drilling oil feeds into their 30 blocks to avoid needing an external oil feed for the VCT. Am I barking up a good tree here?
  • Headstuds: I understand RB26 ones are larger, so this would just require re-drilling the holes on the NEO head?
  • Intake: this is the big one. I would want to keep the ITB's, so this would require welding a new inner runner section using the existing runner to NEO flange and with the runner to TB flange from the 26 on the other end, keeping a similar length and all the water lines etc. I've talked to a fabricator who believes he can do it but any advice/experience here would be helpful. Obviously the main issue would be to keep the length in check as i can't afford to have the plenum space out any further.

Is there anything else am I missing here?

I understand that the NEO head has some design revisions, eg larger exhaust valves from factory, hopefully these would be a net positive to the engine also, is there anything else there which may come into play, eg changes with oil return? Obviously the head will be refreshed and cleaned up with new valve springs etc, and possibly some cams, but this is something that would happen with either head.

Why am I trying to do this? Well, the net cost to me from getting the neo, offloading the bottom end and other ancillaries and the 26 head would probably be 1000 bucks, so even if the extra fabrication and machining work to set it all up is 1-2000 i'm coming out ahead compared to the Ottomoto kit, which is nice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/
Share on other sites

Hnm, a lot of people rave about vct. I'll try and drive a mates car with vct on then off soon.

obviously that's a bit different to a car with properly dialed in cam gears but i'd be getting adjustable gears for the vct head anyway so that may be a moot point, its more about the difference the vct would make, particularly to transient response.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640176
Share on other sites

It's not fair to do the comparison with it enabled and disabled. An engine that is intended to not have VCT will more than likely have fixed valve timing part way between the advanced and retarded positions that the VCT will give. Having VCT enabled means that the engine will feel better at both the top end and bottom end than the engine that doesn't have VCT. Having VCT disabled will make that engine feel better than the non VCT engine at one end of the rev range, and much worse at the other.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640186
Share on other sites

You can usually only put an adjustable cam gear on the exhaust of a VCT head. It is possible to adjust the inlet side but a lot of stuffing around and generally not worth it on an RB25 - no idea what it would be like on a 26.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640197
Share on other sites

I've seen an adjustable gear that has been made up that is pretty easy to adjust, only in the last few months, would more than likely be grabbing one of those.

It's not fair to do the comparison with it enabled and disabled. An engine that is intended to not have VCT will more than likely have fixed valve timing part way between the advanced and retarded positions that the VCT will give. Having VCT enabled means that the engine will feel better at both the top end and bottom end than the engine that doesn't have VCT. Having VCT disabled will make that engine feel better than the non VCT engine at one end of the rev range, and much worse at the other.

Yes you're right, at least it might get me an idea of the difference it would make

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640206
Share on other sites

I believe Ben with a Stagea on here makes adjustable gears for the VCT

My idea of doing it on a dyno is it should/will clearly show any gains top or bottom end

The reason I am not convinced of just VCT especially only on intake is to the best of my knowledge the adjustment goes from one end of the adjuster to the other end which could very well go past the optimal cam angles for top or bottom end power when a fixed set cam in between the different optimal angles may just give a good as or even better result then VCT

Or even good enough to justify not spending $3500-$4500 to fit VCT to one cam

Getting a VE setup on the other hand would be tits

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640258
Share on other sites

what sort of HP are you planning on running? a set of aftermarket cams with adjustable gears "properly" dialed in will probably give you what your after without spending so much$$$$ for very little, if any, gains.

you cant compare a car tuned with vct by just disconnecting it and seeing the difference as you will definitely feel the difference as its set up to run vct!

very hard to compare as every car will "feel" different and react different on the road

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640469
Share on other sites

Ignoring the discussion on the merit of vct, does anyone have any comments or insight about the actual process of mating the NEO head to the 26 block?

From what I understand, the main things that would need to be sorted.

  • Exhaust: i'd be keeping my twin turbo setup, so cylinder 2 and 5 need to be changed, this would best be done by drill+tapping new holes in the head, correct?
  • Cam covers: swap over all my 26 stuff, does it all bolt on? Obviously the timing belt cover would need some adjustments, have some ideas with that.
  • VCT oil feed. As i understand this, the 26 block would have the same issues as doing a VCT on a 30 block so i could use the solutions used there, which is an external feed as i understand it, however i've also seen some info on people drilling oil feeds into their 30 blocks to avoid needing an external oil feed for the VCT. Am I barking up a good tree here?
  • Headstuds: I understand RB26 ones are larger, so this would just require re-drilling the holes on the NEO head?
  • Intake: this is the big one. I would want to keep the ITB's, so this would require welding a new inner runner section using the existing runner to NEO flange and with the runner to TB flange from the 26 on the other end, keeping a similar length and all the water lines etc. I've talked to a fabricator who believes he can do it but any advice/experience here would be helpful. Obviously the main issue would be to keep the length in check as i can't afford to have the plenum space out any further.

Is there anything else am I missing here?

I understand that the NEO head has some design revisions, eg larger exhaust valves from factory, hopefully these would be a net positive to the engine also, is there anything else there which may come into play, eg changes with oil return? Obviously the head will be refreshed and cleaned up with new valve springs etc, and possibly some cams, but this is something that would happen with either head.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7641473
Share on other sites

I'm looking at doing the same thing when I get off my arse. I'm looking at putting the vct straight onto the rb26 head. Using rb25 neo IN cam and vct. I've drawn up a little external solenoid housing that would eliminate the need for it to mount in the head as rb25 neo does.

The oil to the vct will replicate the rb25 neo. I've already moved the cam journal lube hole to the side just like the 25 neo, all that's left is to mount a compression fitting atop #1 IN cam cap to feed the vct cam gallery. 3/16 copper pipe can snake to the back of the head using mounting tabs on the cap bolts and it could exit via a hole through the rubber half moon.

With how much difference there is with the rb25 neo vct on and off surely there are similar gains to be had with the 26.

If you can afford it go V-cam.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7644429
Share on other sites

NEO head, do it. More and more are doing it - for good reason. Or go V-CAM... There is someone making a V-CAM without the HKS price, for the life of me I cannot remember who it is though.

Pete - I can't confirm most of your points except intake. Just get a NEO / ITB throttle plate adapter. There are people that make them, I think like $800 - job done and it's bolt on.

Just shave some material off the plenum you're installing and you're off and running. Even the plate itself - depending on how many mm you need.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7645843
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...