Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

just got a nistune for my r34 gt-t pretty bummed about the dyno results. i havent got the sheet yet but spoke to the tuners, ill post the sheets when i can.

rb25 neo det

Hi-flowed turbo - stage 2 from mta gold coast

3" exhaust from turbo back

840cc denso injectors

z32 afm

walbro 255

blitz se return flow intercooler

spitfire coil packs

gfb respons BOV

Greddy OLED ebc

car got 290hp at 14 psi, apparently the car was still pushing but the waste gate was opening at 14psi and wouldnt' let it go any further.

Just kind of bummed out after readying other guys getting around 220kw - 240kw with roughly same mods.

next step is to get an HKS 14psi actuator and run more boost, when I've got more money haha.

ill post some sheets when I get them tomorrow, but for now what do you guys think?

Edited by d.matho
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/462178-dissapointing-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

hahah yeah I know, I need to take it for a drive. Apparently the power curve is wicked and it can keep climbing once I've got a new actuator, I guess the end goal is to run around 18-19psi eventually. an HKS heavy duty actuator should fix it.

So it made 216 kW, which is 4kw short of what you were hoping for, and you still haven't actually driven the car?

You actually have nothing to be upset about yet

That power on a turbo of dubious "highflowness" and on 14 psi is not disappointing at all. It's only 14 psi!

These ^^

Do you mean the EBC wouldn't let you run any more boost? Or the wastegate actuator itself?

the wastegate itself opens at like 14 the ebc can hold way more. I thought the job of the ebc was to stop the wastegate seeing its max till youve reached the amount of boost you want?

A boost controller can bleed off some of the signal that the actuator sees, allowing you to increase boost above what the actuator is natively sprung for.

BUT......

There are limits. You can't use a bleeder to boost a 5psi actuator up to some much much higher setting like 15 psi (for example and using made up numbers). You can't usually go much higher than about double the native setting of the actuator. Having said that, I have a 5 psi actuator on a Neo turbo that is bled up to 11 or 12 psi.....so you certainly can go more than double. The question is just how much more. Anyway, the reason for not being able to arbitrarily wind up the boost is that the boost controller can't bleed off enough boost to raise it infinitely AND retain ability to control it with good response. On top of that, the exhaust manifold pressure will push the wastegate flap open against the weak spring of a low pressure actuator no matter whether the boost signal is completely disconnected or not!

So in your case, without us knowing what pressure actuator you have, it could be either or both of a couple of causes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...