Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't get it? The browse function has the exact same layout as the previous version.

Now it has headers for participated and timeline which is great!



The font could be smaller to accommodate more post per scroll though.

Site doesn't remember my login details even after I tick the remember me box. 

Upon entering my username and password and clicking login, the site tells me it is a incorrect password. Without changing my details I hit login again and it logs me in.

Clicking on the last post in a thread doesn't take me to the last post always to the second post in a thread.

Currently using chrome but find the same issues under IE. 

2 hours ago, skins said:

Site doesn't remember my login details even after I tick the remember me box. 

Upon entering my username and password and clicking login, the site tells me it is a incorrect password. Without changing my details I hit login again and it logs me in.

Clicking on the last post in a thread doesn't take me to the last post always to the second post in a thread.

Currently using chrome but find the same issues under IE. 

 

Regarding the login issue, can you clear all cookies for SAU and try again? 

I searched for the option to delete attachments in my threads. i.e. pictures, as per previous version and failed :(

Does this version retain that functionality? Looking to reduce the storage used by deleting my old pictures.

I've just put up a post with four images but it keeps duplicating them.  I've deleted them and started again a couple of times, trying different things, but I keep getting dupes.

 

 

1 hour ago, jmknights93 said:

Dark theme lots of issues with incorrectly styling. Anyone else spot this?

Can you share some screens? I tested it for days with the admins and it was fine. 

15 minutes ago, *LOACH* said:

In regards to likes being anonymous. It is that way for all of them for me. It always says someone or the number of likes but I can never see who.

Aha! Its a setting "can view who gave reputation" - i didn't know it existed. I have enabled that for members and i'll work through other groups also.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...