Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Agreed, though people building their cars often don't do that much research - and the tuner/engine builder/whoever are often stuck with having to work with decisions that someone have already made.... not many tuners will turn someone away unless they've made a truly awful decision with the parts they've bought or how they've installed them (if they have at this point).

I don't tune professionally because dealing with this kind of thing daily would do my head in.

 

Edited by Lithium

the turbo is a efr7670? the engine is a rb25det neo with new bearings,gaskets,arp headstuds,new water /oilpump ,head drain,crank collar and bigger sump to be more reliable. exhaust manifold is a old hks twinscroll i think and hks wastegate, it also have a emu ecu with flexfuel sensor and 1200cc sidefeed injectors

  • Like 1

Alright fellas i'm back...

 

Pulled the drivetrain from the wrecked GTR...in the midst of being injured and bummed sold the 8374 .92 EFR and 6 boost manifold off of it.

 

Found another R32 GTR roller that i'm picking up this coming Sunday (yes exactly 1 year ago to the day of me totalling my car by setting the GTR jump distance record).

 

Anyway...what's changed? I'm going all out this time. Bigger cams (was on tomei poncam A) and lighter weight (gutted, caged) car this time. Motor is still BC stroker N1 block stock bores. 2.75 L...everything ther to rev 8,400...everything there to rev to 9k if I dry sump it this time. Last time I maxxed the ID 1350X injectors doing 740 whp on E85...what will the 9180 get me?

 

What turbo setup would you pick and why?

 

Patrick

 

 

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

How the hell, and why, did you end up with sidefeeds on a Neo?

the intake manifold is greddy!and the fuelrail is from a rb25det s1 that was in the car before. so i did move that over on the neo engine and put on bigger injectors from 740cc to the new 1200cc ,going to run e85 on this

On 12/12/2018 at 10:43 PM, HarrisRacing said:

Last time I maxxed the ID 1350X injectors doing 740 whp on E85...what will the 9180 get me?

What turbo setup would you pick and why?

twin efr6258 would still be my favorite turbo setup.  if it had to be single turbo then thats a different conversation, but 2 good twins work and can be magic on these engines

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
  • Like 1
twin efr6258 would still be my favorite turbo setup.  if it had to be single turbo then thats a different conversation, but 2 good twins work and can be magic on these engines
Attached.m_5a650309b7f72b294869d6ba-1.jpeg

Hi? someone know around what rmp i gonna see full boost on my rb25det neo with the bw efr7670 1.05ar ? i have seen some results from the rb26dett engines.. but they do not have vct like the neo and i also have adjustable camgear on exhaust cam i can advance! will boost around 25-27 psi on max..

Here are some interesting real world tests (sorry its a 13B rotary Mazda) but still worth looking at.

100kph to 150kph in 2 seconds and 73 meters, makes 30 psi boost in 3rd gear at ~4800rpm and will hold power to 9300rpm it has a usable power band (235rwkw) from that rpm too, it really goes better than the peak power would suggest, fast on the road, too fast as it requires traction control most times.

Hope to get to try one (EFR) for myself :)

 

don.jpg

mega.jpg

100-150 2sec 73m.jpg

5 hours ago, RICE RACING said:

Here are some interesting real world tests (sorry its a 13B rotary Mazda) but still worth looking at.

100kph to 150kph in 2 seconds and 73 meters, makes 30 psi boost in 3rd gear at ~4800rpm and will hold power to 9300rpm it has a usable power band (235rwkw) from that rpm too, it really goes better than the peak power would suggest, fast on the road, too fast as it requires traction control most times.

Hope to get to try one (EFR) for myself :)

 

don.jpg

mega.jpg

100-150 2sec 73m.jpg

ok nice! what efr is that?

41 minutes ago, s14 rb25det said:

ok nice! what efr is that?

EFR 9180 IWG version, running around 118,000rpm at peak engine rpm

This is it running at a bit lower power setting

 

Edited by RICE RACING
vid attached

It really gets going ,?  13B is such a small motor and it weighs less than half of the  RB26 motor

9180 on that,  MAD , how do they stand up to high revs under  that power?

9 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

It really gets going ,?  13B is such a small motor and it weighs less than half of the  RB26 motor

9180 on that,  MAD , how do they stand up to high revs under  that power?

In two output shaft revolutions on a 13B it fires 4 times so its still displaces 2.616lt effectively. They are a small physical engine that is for sure, and have some great merits in relation to power density, The biggest drawbacks are if you have to compete in specific fuel consumption basis or specific power, they are about 20 to 30% less efficient when talking equivalent engine specifications.

Since the inception (1960's)  prone to sealing problems mostly cause of using a single linear beam to span 80mm distance (13B case) and keeping it in tolerance (flat, round tip on housing surface) is for all intensive purposes impossible. Then consider it has shared chambers and you can effectively take out up to half of the engine. It involves very specific calibration requirements to keep them alive (much harder than any piston engines typically).

In short to answer your question directly though.

This motor v's a RB with same turbo, I have running at same specific power (give or take) bhp/lt/bar and currently have them both at around 1 hour on full load, the Mazda still has compression LOL. Its something no one can really do this is why you don't see any on the road as real road cars, of if they do they have a motor every month put into them with no data to back up the claims of 'durability' we have been proving this car for over 2 years consistently. I will say one thing, without a Life Racing ECU and water injection system none of it would be remotely possible at all. Sure you can have a one hit wonder BS dyno claim or a few 'drag passes' and corresponding arsefacebook posts of world domination, but none of those cars EVER have any road proof of them working ;) or if they try they detonate crack the block throw oil on the tires and spear off into the bushes killing the driver LOL.

We have drift cars in NZ with three or four rotor engines making huge power with a good degree of reliability. It can be done.

 

https://www.worldtimeattack.com/index.php/mad-mike-returns-in-the-quad-rotor-madbul-rx7/

8 hours ago, RICE RACING said:

In short to answer your question directly though.

This motor v's a RB with same turbo, I have running at same specific power (give or take) bhp/lt/bar and currently have them both at around 1 hour on full load, the Mazda still has compression LOL. Its something no one can really do this is why you don't see any on the road as real road cars, of if they do they have a motor every month put into them with no data to back up the claims of 'durability' we have been proving this car for over 2 years consistently. I will say one thing, without a Life Racing ECU and water injection system none of it would be remotely possible at all. Sure you can have a one hit wonder BS dyno claim or a few 'drag passes' and corresponding arsefacebook posts of world domination, but none of those cars EVER have any road proof of them working ;) or if they try they detonate crack the block throw oil on the tires and spear off into the bushes killing the driver LOL.

Had a test run in the RX8 , thought they had a hive of bees under the hood :)

Did you have to do to the motor and what supporting mods to get this result ?

 I would imagine you blew a few donks trying to get it right and I bet it cost a bit on R&D to get the motor to perform for 2 years without going POP!

Hope you didn't kill too many drivers to get the end result LOL

2 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Had a test run in the RX8 , thought they had a hive of bees under the hood :)

Did you have to do to the motor and what supporting mods to get this result ?

 I would imagine you blew a few donks trying to get it right and I bet it cost a bit on R&D to get the motor to perform for 2 years without going POP!

Hope you didn't kill too many drivers to get the end result LOL

The motor in that car is a real nugget actually, built in NZ (it's in the title) but the porting is shit, rotors are the wrong CR, but it has a center bearing main shaft, while not necessary at all it is in there, these nugget engines are very prone to oil blockage and need attention to the breather system to make them work (again shit design) but it lives.

As said the porting is rubbish in the the extreme just goes to show you a rotary can make power with rubbish workmanship LOL...

Some pics below v's a proper port job.

In regards to getting it to live, I've been doing this since 1995 or so (my first turbo rotary) but what I did not have access too since only last 7 or so years is actual hi end race electronics that are exactly what is used in the best forced induction endurance race series around the world, this is what 'honestly' transformed a novel/different idea into some thing that works in all conditions and any eventualities we threw at it (and continue to put it through). We are the only people who run knock limited turbocharged rotaries (to my knowledge)... engines are fully controlled in knock to pre ignition stages, and believe it or not have never yet lost an engine since running the Life Racing F88 ECU. It has taken well over 300 iterations of calibration revisions (yes 300!) some may find that hard to believe but its allot of hours of development and nothing more than that, hardware wise bugger all has changed, some development of water injection specifications and proper integration into the ECU.

Don't get me wrong lots of people (not just me) I am sure have the formula to make these kunt boxes actually work but its the implementation and making it a reality that is the hard bit we have all struggled with !

 

PPRE dogshit v RR donmega.jpg

PPRE v RRdonmega.jpg

Yocunts.jpg

This is what is crucial in these engines and why I rave on about Life Racing who are the undisputed masters of knock control engines honestly.

You can quickly and randomly at times go from minor knock to pre igntion in one engine cycle! and good luck if your ECU of choice and calibrator have no real experience in running to this limit :)

mi.jpg

cro.jpg

wreck.jpg

On 12/16/2018 at 8:23 AM, KiwiRS4T said:

We have drift cars in NZ with three or four rotor engines making huge power with a good degree of reliability. It can be done.

 

 

^ and some of those examples you quote as 'reliable' famously detonated at WTAC and spewed out oil (though no one was killed LOL). Also spinning wheels for a few seconds is not comparable to loading up an engine at 200+kph consistently and repeatedly.

I stand by my original comments, mechanical engineering is the ultimate distiller of bullshit, therefore you only see things in the world that work, this is why you don't see rotaries be they turbo or otherwise in anything meaningful at the top, be that circuit racing, drag racing, top speed events, or out on the streets.

Compare them on an equivalence basis and they are nowhere, still a novel engine though for kunts who like to be different ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...