Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

3 hours ago, burn4005 said:

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

Well there we go, that's cool - thanks!!

6 minutes ago, burn4005 said:

I check this thread daily for the same reason. Can't find any results anywhere on the net for any engine at all running a 8474 other than rt Ernie on the evo years ago. 

Ditto. Been keeping an eye out for results for any of the black series and found bugger all.

This wee clip of a 9274 on a 2.2 stroker Evo X suggests they spool well for the size: 

 

On 6/1/2019 at 10:36 AM, gixer said:

On bottom mount T4 twin scroll manifold, will an EFR 7163 CHRA be sitting  higher then 7670 one? Thanks

It depends on where you are measuring exactly -  The manifold side Turbine Inlet and downpipe side Turbine outlet are identically positioned between 0.80 and 0.92 a/r.. there is no difference in axial position.  However the 7670 has a longer CHRA (axial length) and moves the comp housing out further forward.  additionally the B2 frame is a larger bearing housing with fittings that stick out farther from the center.

I dont know what engine or manifold youre looking at or what point you intend to measure - they are similar. although slightly different

On 5/25/2019 at 8:18 AM, burn4005 said:

I check this thread daily for the same reason. Can't find any results anywhere on the net for any engine at all running a 8474 other than rt Ernie on the evo years ago. 

ill find some time and dig some up, we just had an evoX with good results and this week at pike's peak a friend of mine will be giving his k20 / 8474 0.92 the stick with an unlimited class Pikes Peak entry this year.

On 5/23/2019 at 8:33 PM, burn4005 said:

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

thanks for the plug, SXE style comp covers are available for the legacy EFR turbos.  Waiting on this for the newer 84 and 92 turbos

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
On 6/4/2019 at 7:58 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

thanks for the plug, SXE style comp covers are available for the legacy EFR turbos.  Waiting on this for the newer 84 and 92 turbos

small correction for your website Geoff, the selection currently is shown as "8374 or 9174 compressor cover"

the 9174 option should be with the 9180 as its the compressor size you're interested in, not the turbine.

  • Like 1
9 minutes ago, welshy_32ZILA said:

Lith have you seen that Garrett have released their new g turbos in mid frame. G30/35. Be interesting to see where they sit on your table of flow. 

Yep, I posted in the thread which is about Gseries - will update the table when exact dates is available. Some extremely promising looking options there 

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Nosure said:

8474 1.45 a/r on the way.  Should finish it next month sometime. 

Very nice!  What kind of setup is it going to be working with?   

This is definitely the combination of the range which I suspect has the potential likely shine on an RB

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
    • The BES920 is like the Toyota Camrys of coffee machines. E61 group head is cool, however the time requirements for home use makes it less desirable. The Toyota Camry coffee machine runs twin boilers and also PID temp control, some say it produces coffees as good as an E61 group head machine.
    • And yes with a full tank it will hit limiter free revving or driving 6B6CDF6E-4094-426D-A9CB-6C553475FE36.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...