Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

3 hours ago, burn4005 said:

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

Well there we go, that's cool - thanks!!

6 minutes ago, burn4005 said:

I check this thread daily for the same reason. Can't find any results anywhere on the net for any engine at all running a 8474 other than rt Ernie on the evo years ago. 

Ditto. Been keeping an eye out for results for any of the black series and found bugger all.

This wee clip of a 9274 on a 2.2 stroker Evo X suggests they spool well for the size: 

 

On 6/1/2019 at 10:36 AM, gixer said:

On bottom mount T4 twin scroll manifold, will an EFR 7163 CHRA be sitting  higher then 7670 one? Thanks

It depends on where you are measuring exactly -  The manifold side Turbine Inlet and downpipe side Turbine outlet are identically positioned between 0.80 and 0.92 a/r.. there is no difference in axial position.  However the 7670 has a longer CHRA (axial length) and moves the comp housing out further forward.  additionally the B2 frame is a larger bearing housing with fittings that stick out farther from the center.

I dont know what engine or manifold youre looking at or what point you intend to measure - they are similar. although slightly different

On 5/25/2019 at 8:18 AM, burn4005 said:

I check this thread daily for the same reason. Can't find any results anywhere on the net for any engine at all running a 8474 other than rt Ernie on the evo years ago. 

ill find some time and dig some up, we just had an evoX with good results and this week at pike's peak a friend of mine will be giving his k20 / 8474 0.92 the stick with an unlimited class Pikes Peak entry this year.

On 5/23/2019 at 8:33 PM, burn4005 said:

They are available lith. Not for black series yet but definitely available for all other efrs. Good for people that have cut up their efrs to fit elbows or don't need bov.

https://www.full-race.com/store/borg-warner-efr/efr-components/borgwarner-efr-compressor-cover-sx-e-style/

thanks for the plug, SXE style comp covers are available for the legacy EFR turbos.  Waiting on this for the newer 84 and 92 turbos

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
On 6/4/2019 at 7:58 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

thanks for the plug, SXE style comp covers are available for the legacy EFR turbos.  Waiting on this for the newer 84 and 92 turbos

small correction for your website Geoff, the selection currently is shown as "8374 or 9174 compressor cover"

the 9174 option should be with the 9180 as its the compressor size you're interested in, not the turbine.

  • Like 1
9 minutes ago, welshy_32ZILA said:

Lith have you seen that Garrett have released their new g turbos in mid frame. G30/35. Be interesting to see where they sit on your table of flow. 

Yep, I posted in the thread which is about Gseries - will update the table when exact dates is available. Some extremely promising looking options there 

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Nosure said:

8474 1.45 a/r on the way.  Should finish it next month sometime. 

Very nice!  What kind of setup is it going to be working with?   

This is definitely the combination of the range which I suspect has the potential likely shine on an RB

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...