Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 1/11/2022 at 12:50 PM, The Mafia said:

Just an update. I have the 8474 on the engine now (8374 previously)

It's about 100-200rpm laggier and makes an absolute sh$t tonne more power up top. The 8374 topped out at 650rwhp at 30psi. 

This 8474 is just f$c%ing dumb. At 26psi, it's making well and truly over 750rwhp and just keeps going. It doesn't fall over. 

RB28 with Vcam (264/272), 6boost manifold, 3.5inch exhaust, E85, Emtron KV8 etc etc 

Which rear housing with 8474?

The issue with my 8474 was it did fall over in the top end it was struggling thats the only reason i removed it, I do recall the car had some odd rough running the more i drove it which i mistaked for the turbo, or drop in exhaust cam hurting flow so couldn't really get it to run how it should, but response wise I could get it on almost right off the lights with a gradual clutch drop most wow factor out of any EFR turbo i've tried zero lag getting back on throttle this was 1.05 rear great turbo for fast street driving

Edited by RB335
2 hours ago, RB335 said:

The issue with my 8474 was it did fall over in the top end it was struggling thats the only reason i removed it, I do recall the car had some odd rough running the more i drove it which i mistaked for the turbo, or drop in exhaust cam hurting flow so couldn't really get it to run how it should, but response wise I could get it on almost right off the lights with a gradual clutch drop most wow factor out of any EFR turbo i've tried zero lag getting back on throttle this was 1.05 rear great turbo for fast street driving

Would have been an awesome comparison to see how it went throwing on the 1.45 turbine housing. Presumably that would have given you more top end but obviously at the expense of a bit of response.

When you say falling over in the top end, at what power was that?

Had twin Tial MV-S 38mm gates with Y pipe plumbed back into a 3.5" dump EFR9180 held power fine 8474 began dying up top, I had limited time to do more dyno runs so only did one test but quite a bit of street driving on both turbos.   OK no problem i will try vent them to atmosphere next time see how it effects it will have much more sensors all over the engine on next motor too for monitoring stuff on manifold.

I have no access to an engine or dyno at the moment Mafia you are interested i can send you my 9180 then cover freight back to me you can test it lots of tech talk etc but test ok.

Edited by RB335

a 3.5" plumbed back exhaust with an 8474 on kill would have had sky high EMAP.

screamers would add loads of power through VE improvement and pumping loss reduction.

at that kind of compressor power you'd be at expansion ratios of 3.5:1 or more on the turbine, so every PSI of backpressure would be 3.5+psi in the manifold.

Edited by burn4005
12 minutes ago, RB335 said:

Had twin Tial MV-S 38mm gates with Y pipe plumbed back into a 3.5" dump EFR9180 held power fine 8474 began dying up top, I had limited time to do more dyno runs so only did one test but quite a bit of street driving on both turbos.   OK no problem i will try vent them to atmosphere next time see how it effects it will have much more sensors all over the engine on next motor too for monitoring stuff on manifold.

I have no access to an engine or dyno at the moment Mafia you are interested i can send you my 9180 then cover freight back to me you can test it lots of tech talk etc but test ok.

I would say the 74mm turbine would have been at it's limit and the pressure ratio across the engine would have started to go up. 

The 9180 has the bigger rear which will flow a lot more before choking up. 

haha do you trust me enough to send me a turbo? I have access to a dyno but it's a bit of a big job to swap them over

  • 5 months later...
On 29/04/2023 at 1:47 AM, SLVRBAKSLPZ said:

Any recent dyno results of a 9180 or 9280??

Not an RB, but the nost recent result I've seen, and one of the more impressive is this 3litre VVTi 2JZGTE making 1130hp @ hubs with 30psi by 4000rpm on an EFR9280:
https://fb.watch/kiHcr8Bydb/

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 3
On 4/28/2023 at 6:47 AM, SLVRBAKSLPZ said:

Any recent dyno results of a 9180 or 9280??

EFR turbos have largely been unavailable for the last 18 months so until BW resumes production its likely going to be pretty quiet

  • Like 1
On 05/05/2023 at 5:42 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

EFR turbos have largely been unavailable for the last 18 months so until BW resumes production its likely going to be pretty quiet

Any idea if some of the SX-R upgrades are going to flow over the to EFR range?  The compressor map for the S200SX-R 7670 (/ S258SX-R?) looks like a cracker and could only imagine similar aero would make a worthy and needed update for the EFR7670:
image.thumb.png.7d5de5ff319e3e334d7d91ca0bf259b7.png

  • Like 2

Hi, 

Me again. Long time between drinks Any chance anyone would have a 1.45 ar rear housing interested in swapping for a 1.05 to suit a 8474? Turbo is choking Uptop and keen to see with a gearbox change how a 1.45 would respond. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
On 31/05/2023 at 3:24 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

Full Race stocks the 1.45 a/r turbine housing, can ship immediately if you're in need.  

Hey mate, any specials for the SAU team? I have an EFR 8474 Black series on my RB28 and it has the 1.0AR rear. I think it's choking up. 

Do you have any back to back dynos / comparisons of the smaller and larger rears? 

16 hours ago, The Mafia said:

Hey mate, any specials for the SAU team? I have an EFR 8474 Black series on my RB28 and it has the 1.0AR rear. I think it's choking up. Do you have any back to back dynos / comparisons of the smaller and larger rears? 

Depending on how high you rev the 2.8, and your boost level - choking can happen with 1.05 a/r. If you can log turbo speed and backpressure it's insightful into making a change.

The 1.45 a/r back to backs are deceiving - on the steady state dyno they look like identical spool.  but on the street, its anywhere from 150-400rpm later spool depending on gear.  

I'd be happy to crunch the #s for a match if you wanted to know what the calculations show?  




 

4 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

Depending on how high you rev the 2.8, and your boost level - choking can happen with 1.05 a/r. If you can log turbo speed and backpressure it's insightful into making a change.

The 1.45 a/r back to backs are deceiving - on the steady state dyno they look like identical spool.  but on the street, its anywhere from 150-400rpm later spool depending on gear.  

I'd be happy to crunch the #s for a match if you wanted to know what the calculations show?  




 

It would be massively appreciated if you could please fudge the figures to make it look like spool up is 1500 rpm later and it only makes 2 HP difference?  That would instantly save me spending $1600 for something that will sit on a shelf for the next 2 years....

  • Haha 1
9 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

Depending on how high you rev the 2.8, and your boost level - choking can happen with 1.05 a/r. If you can log turbo speed and backpressure it's insightful into making a change.

The 1.45 a/r back to backs are deceiving - on the steady state dyno they look like identical spool.  but on the street, its anywhere from 150-400rpm later spool depending on gear.  

I'd be happy to crunch the #s for a match if you wanted to know what the calculations show?  




 

At the moment I am running 20-24psi and rev it to 7,000rpm on the circuit. I have a Holinger 6speed so there isn't a great need to rev it hard, only keep the rpm above 4500rpm or it bogs a little. 

It's a 9.75:1 compression ratio with a HKS Vcam. 264/272 cams. 

It's a hard one for me. 150rpm I can live with, but 400rpm would hurt a little in two corners that I know. 

I plan to put it in the dyno soon and measure the back pressure through one of the EGT ports. I have plenty of logs and data, and I mean lots of data. I also have turbo speeds. Running between 104,000rpm and 108,000rpm. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
×
×
  • Create New...