Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, mr skidz said:

Wonder why type A cams never get much consideration?
To date my smaller 2.7L is producing 20psi on 98ron earlier than 2.8L's on E85 with the same turbos.
Which is something to think about.

I get positive boost from 1,500rpm and starts pulling from 2,500 rpm which is where you want your cams to operate.

 


My boost plotted againt Paul's and biggest difference is cams and lack of head work on my part.
3b8b670bc05fbbf0b381dc6391478d10.jpg

 

 

Is boost pressure alone giving the full story of how much power the engine is actually making?

 

 

Good to see SAU never changes lol

I did type Bs to type Rs on a 2.6 with -7s, both sets dialed for response and both sets made same topend power but the type Rs hit full boost about 800rpm sooner 

I can't comment on V stock cams as I never used them in my 34 but the stock cams in my 32 dialed for response easy smacked the 34 for bottom end but when you take into account stock turbos and 4.11 diffs it's not comparable in the slightest  

The Type Rs on a 3.0 with RSs went 458awkw@28psi and I have since gone EU 260 cams and Audi R8 coils and .5mm over size in piston with .2 increase in CR, latest graph below

I am interested in your graph of pods V airbox for a R34 as we have hit a wall with boost and my tuner believes it's an intake restriction

I think dialed in the type Rs will give a better result then stock but the best question is will the result be worth the expense 

image.jpeg

  • Like 3

The graph I posted earlier, was with pods. I dont have a specific airbox vs pods back to back graph, but I was there and fitted them myself then spun it up.

14rkw, on boost sooner, and held boost easier.

Nothing else was changed between runs other than pods.

We had tuned for a new plazaman and gained some power and response, but the pods was done separately.

  • Like 1
38 minutes ago, ActionDan said:

The graph I posted earlier, was with pods. I dont have a specific airbox vs pods back to back graph, but I was there and fitted them myself then spun it up.

14rkw, on boost sooner, and held boost easier.

Nothing else was changed between runs other than pods.

We had tuned for a new plazaman and gained some power and response, but the pods was done separately.
 

Ok interesting, did you remove the bung from the feed that goes into the side guard ?

what have you changed on the intake, just airbox or intake pipes as well ?

I still run stock airbox and stock piping and curious of what parts create how much restriction 

Yes it had already been removed and I was running an apexi panel filter.

Nothing else was changed, literally just bolted on pods.

I have since changed to AFM deletes and KTS hard suction pipes but that was more for aesthetics.

I'm waiting on camtech to get back to me. 

Does anyone know what the max lift is you can go before requiring buckets? 

I was wondering if they could make me a 248 or 250 duration with a bit more lift, if possible. If no more lift can be achieved, then maybe just a 248 with the same lift. 

I'm inclined to wanna test cams, as I got a good result with the Sil, but I alos came to the realisation I've had the car for almost a year, spent over 20k on it and barely driven it. So Cams might get shelved for a while given the nicer weather is here and I should actually drive the thing and enjoy it. 

I still need to get the rims resprayed, and maybe get the calipers re-done, but again I should drive it for a bit. 

Admittedly from a guy who sells Cams, but interesting response. 

************

He recommended their 260 cam - http://www.camtechcams.com.au/niss_6cyl_rb26.html

"Hi Dan,

 

The cams to use is our 413a. see cam specs below."

*********

Which I thought was too big based on what we've discussed here and asked him  what he thought.

*********


" Hi Malcolm,

 
I've been told that's too much duration and will cost me response, potentially down low and mid range torque also due to overlap dropping dynamic compression. 
 
Thoughts? 


*********


He doesn't agree....

*********

"Hi Dan,

 

I think unfortunately the people that are giving you advise may be a little inexperienced.

 

The cam I suggested is the next size bigger than standard.

 

If you put anything smaller than want I have recommended you are wasting your time."

*********

Which is odd given I asked him specifically about the 250 degree Type R. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
    • It sounds farrrrrrr too cold at your place Duncan... Here I was thinking our 10 degrees overnight is getting cold...
    • oh yeah, reminded this morning....bin lids frozen shut too
    • In my case not, because of total reno. But yeah.
    • Did you use an electronic speedo drive? Does you speedometer read all the way to 180km?
×
×
  • Create New...