Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, timmy_89 said:

Mine aren't quite this lumpy anymore, still but definitely more noticeable then Johnny's "street" car :P

 

In your case its probably just a misfire as you forgot to plug in an injector :laugh:

  • Haha 3
18 hours ago, timmy_89 said:

y u no lumpy

"Stock" car bro lol..

Also found out why my EBC was being so lazy, somehow the lines going to the EBC had dirt in them lol. Will test the car later tonight and hopefully won't need as much DC to hit my boost target.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 01/03/2018 at 4:38 PM, NEO25T said:

Hmmm there must be a good update brewing?

Found out each time I spin the motor past 8k it spits the PS belt lol. 

Was overseas for 1.5 weeks, will work on the croc of shit soon :)

 

  • Like 2

Decided to start to the car today, has been offline for nearly 2 weeks.

Started first go, and yes the tacho is going mental - either it's going into the bin OR I find money out of my arse for a dash :D  Also for those with a good eye, yes the FPR shows 3bar with the vac on, but weirdly enough when the car warms up it will drop to about 2.6 bar, i.e. 3bar without the vacuum attached.

Note the popping and volume changes are not from the car itself, it's my phone (LG G6) doing weird shit.

 

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...

Flex Sensor Fridays... 

Deleted the karnt, had fuel pressure fluctuation issues and turns out this was the problem.

Because I run a Wallahbro 460L there's a fair amount of fuel being circulated back through the return. With the flex sensor in line, I couldn't screw down the fuel pressure less than 2.6 bar (that's with the entire bolt pulled out of the FPR).

Now that it is out, I can drop fuel pressure below 2 bar.

For now it's out until I re-think my fuel system through.

20180330_134528.thumb.jpg.2295fc57d93db8a3000aa948c1a4c148.jpg

not a bad idea :)

But I'm planning to do it between the surge tank's overflow back into the main tank, as the lift pump I'm planning to use would be only a DW200 so there won't be much of a problem where as now I'm using a Wallabro 460L and it's flowing quite a bit of fuel around the system.

Just now, Robzilla32 said:

But if you that, is the sensor measurement still accurate enough?

plenty accurate, there's still going to be fuel flowing through it :)

 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Robzilla32 said:

But if you do that, is the sensor measurement still accurate enough?

 

 

Put a 1-2psi valve in the by pass. That way the sensor gets all the fuel it needs and as soon as there is a slight rise in pressure, the excess goes via the by pass.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

not a bad idea

But I'm planning to do it between the surge tank's overflow back into the main tank, as the lift pump I'm planning to use would be only a DW200 so there won't be much of a problem where as now I'm using a Wallabro 460L and it's flowing quite a bit of fuel around the system.

What if there is very little/no fuel coming back from the surge tank. Sensor gets no fuel flow, reading goes stupid, engine doesn’t know what ethanol content it is. Not a smart place for it IMO. Have seen it on another car and funnily enough it got moved.

8 hours ago, Piggaz said:

What if there is very little/no fuel coming back from the surge tank. Sensor gets no fuel flow, reading goes stupid, engine doesn’t know what ethanol content it is. Not a smart place for it IMO. Have seen it on another car and funnily enough it got moved.

Good point, there will be times the surge overflow will dribble out fuel. If that's the case I'll just pop it on the feed side, tank -> lift pump -> flex sensor -> surge tank.

 

My car had fuel pressure issues initially after putting in the new Walbro 450, it flows _a lot_ of fuel. My workshop spent a bit of time troubleshooting it and ended up swapping the stock reg for a Magnaflow, which settled it down.

Good riddance of that flex sensor, who needs anything but ethanol anyway ;)

I had fuel pressure issue with Walbro 460, mine was with a restrictor in the factory fuel hoses (R34 non turbo hose setup). I still have the stock jet pump in the tank too, going to drill that out a bit soon too.
You have a radium venturi dont you dose?

Just a stock venturi Phil, that will stay as I will be running a DW200 lift pump in future.

I have a Radium Fuel Pulsation Damper (FPD) which has helped with fueling on cruise areas of the map. Before I had to dial in heaps of fuel to remove the sputtering and now those issues are some what gone. I haven't had the chance to drive the car after the flex sensor was removed but I can only imagine it would run a bit better as the FPR is actually working properly now.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, dr phil said:

Did that replace the ones in the engine bay? There are two right - one bolted to the side on the return line, and one on the fuel rail?

Yes that is correct only for the R34 GT-t, R33 GTS/-t only had them post fuel rail.

Mine is deleted because I placed my flex sensor there initially but after all the issues its a straight hose from the FPR to the return.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...