Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, timmy_89 said:

Mine aren't quite this lumpy anymore, still but definitely more noticeable then Johnny's "street" car :P

 

In your case its probably just a misfire as you forgot to plug in an injector :laugh:

  • Haha 3
18 hours ago, timmy_89 said:

y u no lumpy

"Stock" car bro lol..

Also found out why my EBC was being so lazy, somehow the lines going to the EBC had dirt in them lol. Will test the car later tonight and hopefully won't need as much DC to hit my boost target.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 01/03/2018 at 4:38 PM, NEO25T said:

Hmmm there must be a good update brewing?

Found out each time I spin the motor past 8k it spits the PS belt lol. 

Was overseas for 1.5 weeks, will work on the croc of shit soon :)

 

  • Like 2

Decided to start to the car today, has been offline for nearly 2 weeks.

Started first go, and yes the tacho is going mental - either it's going into the bin OR I find money out of my arse for a dash :D  Also for those with a good eye, yes the FPR shows 3bar with the vac on, but weirdly enough when the car warms up it will drop to about 2.6 bar, i.e. 3bar without the vacuum attached.

Note the popping and volume changes are not from the car itself, it's my phone (LG G6) doing weird shit.

 

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...

Flex Sensor Fridays... 

Deleted the karnt, had fuel pressure fluctuation issues and turns out this was the problem.

Because I run a Wallahbro 460L there's a fair amount of fuel being circulated back through the return. With the flex sensor in line, I couldn't screw down the fuel pressure less than 2.6 bar (that's with the entire bolt pulled out of the FPR).

Now that it is out, I can drop fuel pressure below 2 bar.

For now it's out until I re-think my fuel system through.

20180330_134528.thumb.jpg.2295fc57d93db8a3000aa948c1a4c148.jpg

not a bad idea :)

But I'm planning to do it between the surge tank's overflow back into the main tank, as the lift pump I'm planning to use would be only a DW200 so there won't be much of a problem where as now I'm using a Wallabro 460L and it's flowing quite a bit of fuel around the system.

Just now, Robzilla32 said:

But if you that, is the sensor measurement still accurate enough?

plenty accurate, there's still going to be fuel flowing through it :)

 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Robzilla32 said:

But if you do that, is the sensor measurement still accurate enough?

 

 

Put a 1-2psi valve in the by pass. That way the sensor gets all the fuel it needs and as soon as there is a slight rise in pressure, the excess goes via the by pass.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

not a bad idea

But I'm planning to do it between the surge tank's overflow back into the main tank, as the lift pump I'm planning to use would be only a DW200 so there won't be much of a problem where as now I'm using a Wallabro 460L and it's flowing quite a bit of fuel around the system.

What if there is very little/no fuel coming back from the surge tank. Sensor gets no fuel flow, reading goes stupid, engine doesn’t know what ethanol content it is. Not a smart place for it IMO. Have seen it on another car and funnily enough it got moved.

8 hours ago, Piggaz said:

What if there is very little/no fuel coming back from the surge tank. Sensor gets no fuel flow, reading goes stupid, engine doesn’t know what ethanol content it is. Not a smart place for it IMO. Have seen it on another car and funnily enough it got moved.

Good point, there will be times the surge overflow will dribble out fuel. If that's the case I'll just pop it on the feed side, tank -> lift pump -> flex sensor -> surge tank.

 

My car had fuel pressure issues initially after putting in the new Walbro 450, it flows _a lot_ of fuel. My workshop spent a bit of time troubleshooting it and ended up swapping the stock reg for a Magnaflow, which settled it down.

Good riddance of that flex sensor, who needs anything but ethanol anyway ;)

I had fuel pressure issue with Walbro 460, mine was with a restrictor in the factory fuel hoses (R34 non turbo hose setup). I still have the stock jet pump in the tank too, going to drill that out a bit soon too.
You have a radium venturi dont you dose?

Just a stock venturi Phil, that will stay as I will be running a DW200 lift pump in future.

I have a Radium Fuel Pulsation Damper (FPD) which has helped with fueling on cruise areas of the map. Before I had to dial in heaps of fuel to remove the sputtering and now those issues are some what gone. I haven't had the chance to drive the car after the flex sensor was removed but I can only imagine it would run a bit better as the FPR is actually working properly now.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, dr phil said:

Did that replace the ones in the engine bay? There are two right - one bolted to the side on the return line, and one on the fuel rail?

Yes that is correct only for the R34 GT-t, R33 GTS/-t only had them post fuel rail.

Mine is deleted because I placed my flex sensor there initially but after all the issues its a straight hose from the FPR to the return.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...