Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 7/15/2022 at 5:03 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Once you go DBW, you don't look back. Great idle quality, AC doesn't cause idle quality to degrade.

The factory air leak valves are so slow to react, with bigger cams your motor is very inefficient at lower RPMs the compressor engaging is enough to stall the motor.

Nissan should have used stepper motors like JZs or 4Gs, instead they installed a two slow reacting air leak valves lol.

Have you seen the rats nest of hoses under the intake manifold of an RB26? Stepper motors for idle control is far too elegant. On the bright side at least the power steering idle up on these motors isn't a physical valve that can start leaking power steering fluid into the intake with age.

  • Haha 1
On 15/7/2022 at 11:12 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Used up everyone single DPI, AVI. Even sacrificed the power steering input lol.

DBW uses up 4x inputs.

How many extra i/o’s does if use. 

On 16/7/2022 at 10:03 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Once you go DBW, you don't look back. Great idle quality, AC doesn't cause idle quality to degrade.

The factory air leak valves are so slow to react, with bigger cams your motor is very inefficient at lower RPMs the compressor engaging is enough to stall the motor.

Nissan should have used stepper motors like JZs or 4Gs, instead they installed a two slow reacting air leak valves lol.

The fact they fitted 2 of them always confused me 

On 16/7/2022 at 12:03 PM, RBW49N said:

How many extra i/o’s does if use. 

Drive by wire uses 4 AVIs and the 2 dbw driver wires 

brake and clutch pedal use one each 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 16/7/2022 at 12:55 PM, r32-25t said:

Drive by wire uses 4 AVIs and the 2 dbw driver wires 

brake and clutch pedal use one each 

Thanks Looks like I’ll need an i/o expander. May as well get a can button panel as well. No clutch pedal on mine. So I saved one there

To free up some AVIs you can cheat with the temperature sensors and use them on SPIs and change the scaling of the sensor to suit 

the drive by wire AVIs must be on the ecu and can’t be in the i/o box 

  • Like 1
On 7/16/2022 at 12:27 PM, r32-25t said:

Did you not already fit a brake pedal input when going to dbw as fail safe if something goes to shit? 

Is that even a thing?

On 16/7/2022 at 1:01 PM, r32-25t said:

To free up some AVIs you can cheat with the temperature sensors and use them on SPIs and change the scaling of the sensor to suit 

the drive by wire AVIs must be on the ecu and can’t be in the i/o box 

I’ll have to move some other stuff to the I/o box then. Probably auto controls

On 7/16/2022 at 1:05 PM, RBW49N said:

Try doing a brake job in a modern car with a factory ecu 

That's a different story.

In relation to aftermarket ecus with dbw I have never seen them need a brake pedal input as part of the safety system.

  • Like 1
On 16/7/2022 at 2:16 PM, Ben C34 said:

That's a different story.

In relation to aftermarket ecus with dbw I have never seen them need a brake pedal input as part of the safety system.

When you select drive by wire in the haltech ecu it pushes you to set up a brake pedal input so that if the pedal says be closed and the brake pedal is saying you want to stop but the throttle isn’t closed it will put it straight into limp mode 

On 7/16/2022 at 3:42 PM, r32-25t said:

When you select drive by wire in the haltech ecu it pushes you to set up a brake pedal input so that if the pedal says be closed and the brake pedal is saying you want to stop but the throttle isn’t closed it will put it straight into limp mode 

Interesting. Link ecus definitely dont do that, nor do motec from my experience.

 

 

it deosnt make sense, because all that matters is the pedal and the throttle relationship. If the pedal is lifted and the throttle is still open it should go to safety conditions straight away, regardless if you push the brake or not. Can't see how it helps at all. 

 

Also I am assuming you mean  a mismatch between the pedal and throttle and foot on the brake makes it go into safety mode, otherwise you wouldn't be able to do burnouts and that would be dumb!

 

 

Anyway I looked it up and it is optional to have the brake pedal as part of dbw safety with Haltech, and it doesnt relate to a failsafe function really anyway compared to having to have a primary and secondary position sensor on both Pedal and throttle.

 

Brake Pedal Check  Enable if a Brake Pedal Switch has been wired and configured. Enabling this function will enable the Max Brake TPS Setting. This setting will override all other commanded throttle values.

 

 

 

 

From

https://support.haltech.com/portal/en/kb/articles/drive-by-wire-elite

can't see why anyone would actually do it.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

The brake input is optional on the Haltech, I personally don't use the brake input.

I'll post up my IO assignment tonight, unfortunately using SPI for temperature sensors are not recommended as you lose resolution. 

  • Like 1
On 7/16/2022 at 4:36 PM, r32-25t said:

I hooked up both my brake and clutch pedals into the ecu all my temp sensors are on AVI except fuel 

So are you using a lower throttle plate max opening with brake pressed?

On 16/7/2022 at 5:25 PM, Duncan said:

using a brake pedal override seems like a nightmare for left foot braking/trail braking, and burnouts for that matter

Sounds like a great excuse to have a “hoon” “race” button on the CAN keypad

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...