Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep power fc

 

its currently on stock afm although I have a r35 gtr afm ready to fit. Will need tuned again then 

it currently makes about 1.3 bar but tails off fairly early, I know that's fairly expected but is there anything I can do to help that ? If I run higher boost will it hold it better to red line?

Edited by Eager

No.

It might make more mid range hp, then taper off.

Effectively make it feel like a tractor to drive.

Look at the comment in Robo's thread from 13 years ago.  That setup was at about 0.9 bar, 220rwkW.

If you want more hp, bolt on a bigger turbo that can pass more air.

  • Thanks 1
On 10/25/2017 at 7:39 AM, Eager said:

I know they are not the best match

I think they're a great turbo for a street setup as long as you only want 220 - 240KW, although obviously getting old now.

I just had mine tuned by Anthony ( @Guilt-Toy) and it makes 234KW.

On 10/28/2017 at 5:22 PM, Eager said:

it currently makes about 1.3 bar but tails off fairly early, I know that's fairly expected but is there anything I can do to help that ? If I run higher boost will it hold it better to red line?

Mine tails off also, and it's running only 13PSI up near redline - it's not a big turbo after all, and would be running out of flow at high RPM

On 10/28/2017 at 7:00 PM, Dale FZ1 said:

Effectively make it feel like a tractor to drive.

lol, I picked up my car from Newcastle on Saturday and drove to a mates place in Kyogle. On Sunday morning we did some tractor work on his tree plantation - the Skyline feels substantially different to my mates tractor :)

IMG_0773.thumb.JPG.edcd10ddc8944cb463249e04d42d0932.JPG

 

On 10/28/2017 at 7:00 PM, Dale FZ1 said:

If you want more hp, bolt on a bigger turbo that can pass more air.

I completely agree with this :thumbsup:

cheers

Mike

  • Like 1
On 10/25/2017 at 8:32 AM, Torques said:

 

Hi Torques,

Thanks for posting that - a bit of history there.

From Robo's 2004 post:

"Down low it is virtually eye for eye with the stock turbo, above 5000rpm is where it improves. But, when running 17psi in earlier testing, midrange before 4500rpm was pulling like a train. At 100k in 4th, you could just boot it and it would take off, nice!!"...

My actuator is opening too soon, so the 2530 on my car is laggier than stock - but once the boost kicks in around 3500 - 4000 rpm it pulls very hard.

I'm sure there's a bunch of modern turbos that perform way better than the 2530, both faster spool up and higher flow, but for an old turbo, where streetable power up to around 230kw is sufficient, they work great - mine brings a smile to my face every time I hop in the car.

cheers,

Mike

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

You've probably got to get a firm idea of what you're trying to achieve.  And at what cost/effort.

What are you trying to achieve?

 

There's nothing inherently wrong with the 2530, BTW.  It just has limitations, same as any other turbo.

https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/turbochargers/gtx2867r-gen-ii

You could use a GTX2867 supercore and install your existing turbine housing onto that.  Relatively simple changeover, and it should make a bit more hp with broadly similar (but different) response characteristics.  Not a worthwhile change IMO, on a $$/hp basis. Unless the 2530 looks like it's on its last legs.

 

Home-cooked hybrid spec turbo just isn't worth it either, when there are plenty of tested/proven combinations for RB25 out there

 

My long term goal is 6boost,plazmaman,gtx3071 or 3076 gen2 type spec

but that’s a while away so something that bolts on for now that gives more than the 2530, the boost tails off fairly early on it I find leaving you feeling a bit underwhelmed as that’s the joy of rb25 for me, pulling power right to high revs 

  • Like 1

Hypergear highflowed stock turbo will give you a bit more and will hold boost better up top and is direct bolt on. Power does tail off around 6500rpm but can make around 250-260rwkw and costs around $900 which you will be able to get a fair bit back on when you decide to do your desired setup and sell it off. Only negative thing about it is its journal bearing. Still works good. I have one, made 260kw on 98 and 312 on e85.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
2 hours ago, Eager said:

My long term goal is 6boost,plazmaman,gtx3071 or 3076 gen2 type spec

but that’s a while away so something that bolts on for now that gives more than the 2530, the boost tails off fairly early on it I find leaving you feeling a bit underwhelmed as that’s the joy of rb25 for me, pulling power right to high revs 

Understood :)

 

Unless you get something that has a fair bit of increased turbine capacity, it will tail off somewhere around 6-6500rpm.

I may know of something suitable as a stop gap. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...