Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lots of negative here, if you don't like a sequential then fine but plenty of race pros prefer them and when watching in car videos you can see why. Depending on driver skill then the syncros will  be a serviceable item just like the dogs are in a dog box. 

Phil in the mighty 280ZX with a Quaife sequential dog box.

 

Edited by 260DET

What has a H pattern got anything to do with it, all depends on the driver. With a dog box the shifts have to be hard and fast as the video above showed, with a syncro box it's easier on the syncros if the shift is made a bit slower which can be done using that sequential conversion. Drivers bang through shifts on a H pattern box all the time, the syncros don't care which pattern the shifter is.

Too much bandwagoning and not enough thinking going on here.

Edited by 260DET
  • Like 2

Either way you have to wait for the synchro’s.... well to match speed.

Sick. So you have a mad looking shifter that goes backwards and forwards.... slowly. 

You cant set up a fancy nob to ignition cut for a quick change like a real sequential box.... so what’s the point. Well I suppose you could but the shift won’t be any quicker because of the synchro’s. *ignition cut..... cutting..... cutting...sweet they’re matched now”. To do that you’ll need a fancy nob ($1000-$1600 depending on what one you choose) and an ECU that can do that so that rules out a Power FC.

“Farrrrkk, you got a sequential bro?”

”Nah man, still a factory box but it looks like I do. Sick hey!. Can you like my car on Insta and Facetube?”

?.

Take the money and put something decent on the car! It’s junk and belongs in the dumpster!

 

Sequential would be rubbish in traffic but for a  bit of track time for someone who likes a sequential this Bremer shifter makes a lot of sense. A dog box sequential is something else again, in outlay and in use, it certainly would be more awkward to use in traffic. Don't know about Nissan boxes but for Tremecs there are shift enhancements available including carbon fibre syncro rings so box life with them should be good. 

There is nothing fake here, it's an option which would make sense for some.

 

 

17 hours ago, mlracing said:

Ikeya Formula have been doing this for years. Presumably you still need to use the clutch like you do with the Ikeya one

and they're shit.. that sequential shifter is also shit.. you forget to clutch and boom!

A proper sequential box, with strain gauge to cut ignition/rpm and/or shut your TB via DBW is the only way.

You can't just throw loads of RPM and torque in between gears, even DSG cuts torque via a torque management strategy - thus the farts and pops.

  • Haha 1

Just because you have a sequential shift like this one does not mean the car has to be driven like it's a big dollar race box, it can be shifted at the same speed as usual. Sure shifting will require a bit of learning but so does double declutching  which plenty of drivers can't do well yet still manage to do decent times without wrecking gearboxes. A strain gauge setup could be fitted but I don't think that anyone is claiming  that for a full on race use this is the best shifter.

Yet to see any coherent argument that this sequential would not suit someone who particularly wants a sequential shift but realises this one's limitations. Because it will work within those limitations.

Sequential shift, but you still need to use the clutch and make sure you lift off the accelerator... quite pointless and being Nissan, the FS5W30A gearset, they don't like to be shifted fast and at super high RPM.

All these negative comments I could understand if you were going from an actual sequential gearbox with all the bells and whistes, to a standard box with this kit on it.

Anyone who is only used to the ol' H-pattern on the track is still going to have clutch on accel off muscle memory and an idea of their rev range, unless they are literally retarded.

The benefits I can see are: 

  • the shifter location, i.e. closer to the steering wheel for those who aren't sick leb dream boats that drive with one hand on the gearknob at all times for that phallic sensation.
  • reinforces the practice of downshifting through the gears, rather than say from 4 to 2,
  • minimises the memory requirement of the current gear, especially when you're mixing it up, trying 2nd instead of 3rd at a slower corner to keep the revs up for example, and the gearknob is some 10 to 15cm south west of where you thought it was

of course all this still requires the driver to be actively thinking about what they're doing, which to be quite honest, that's literally your one job while driving, is to think about driving.

So for my shitty track car worth <$5k am I going to spend $20+k on a sequential? hell no, $1.5k on a lever? much more likely

  • 5 years later...

Hi all, thread revamp 

Im looking to buy one of the new Speedtek dog gearsets (i know the history) and was wondering if one of the sequential conversions above would work, noting the concerns re normal syncros.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...