Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MBS206 said:

Interestingly, I would have thought the oil would be warming the coolant up to begin with, and then the coolant keeping oil temps down.

 

From memory oil runs at around 2.6kj/degc, while water is around 4.7

Water capacity from memory is nearly 10L vs 5L for oil.

 

In my tired ass state, coolant would need to be seeing 4x more heat energy than the oil (which is quite possible, this is an aspect I have NFI on, and does seem very plausible).

 

It would be interesting if anyone has oil temp logging and coolant temp (coolant in the block, not the rad hose) with the stock heat exchanger in place.

But I'm guessing most people logging that sort of data these days are running aftermarket coolers and no exchanger.

 

It's a matter of where the heat is released and which fluid sees it first, rather than high falutin' thermodynamics stuff with specific heat capacity or how much of the stuff is in the engine.. Combustion happens in the head, which is heavy with water jackets.

  • Like 3
On 11/04/2023 at 10:13 PM, Murray_Calavera said:

@MBS206

I've got the factory heat exchanger, oil temp sensor in my sandwich plate and water temp sensor in the factory location. Happy to log data if you like. 

Just still trying to wrap my head around all of this as I'm still newbie in this field and still learning 

If you get an oil cooler kit that removes the factory HX but has an oil filter relocation with an inbuilt thermostat and the taarks oil block which allows for OEM pil pressure sensor and additional senskry ports for temp why would the factory HX still be required. Aren't all these components essentially working together to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold starts or not?

Example this kit I found has all components to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold start or drag/roll/circuit 

https://theskylineshed.com.au/products/the-skyline-shed-tss-oil-cooler-kit-to-suit-rb20-rb25-rb25neo-rb26-rb30?variant=41664869368002

 

 

 

 

36 minutes ago, YD34GTT said:

why would the factory HX still be required. Aren't all these components essentially working together to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold starts or not?

If you remove the factory water to oil HX, you do not get the warming aspect of that situation. Having the warming is a nicety that you can live without, probably unless you live in a real cold climate and would actually gain a reasonable sized benefit from keeping it.

  • Like 1
16 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

If you remove the factory water to oil HX, you do not get the warming aspect of that situation. Having the warming is a nicety that you can live without, probably unless you live in a real cold climate and would actually gain a reasonable sized benefit from keeping it.

Ahh ok so putting the taarks oil block with the sensors and the oil relocation with thermostat does not do what the factory HX does? (That's maybe where my thought process was wrong) I was under the assumption they replaced the factory HX and did a better job

14 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

No. Does physically replace the HX, does not replace its function.

Ahaa ok now it makes sense thanks heaps for clarity 

And sorry last question then everything will make sense for me in this regard 

So why do so many remove the HX if it's function isn't replaced? Is it not important or is it that it does not perform well with heavily modified engines 

Like if I remove mine and use those oil cooler kits am I at risk of anything (I live in Sydney if that helps with climate)

 

People remove it for simplicity and realistically... room. If you're adding stuff out there, real estate is a limited budget and the function of this device is minimal at best. Especially for people who have 500kw and want an oil cooler.

Supposedly they fail but it doesn't actually seem to happen that often. It's primarily because the space and simplicity given people are usually adding sensors, -AN lines in the area that used to be occupied by that HX.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...