Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I am building a Nitto Stroked RB28 with all the goodies, fully Ported/Polished Head, Kelford 182-SE Cams, VR38 Coil conversion, PRP 32T Trigger kit (or similar) etc. Looking at using either the 6Boost T4 Divided Manifold or Hypertune T4 divided. Which Turbo will give me the quickest spool from around 3500rpm to 8500rpm without running out of puff? Looking for around 750 - 900hp.

Thank you for your input.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484757-best-turbo-for-early-spool-rb28/
Share on other sites

Hi, Forgot to mention that the car will run mostly on RON98 But will be E85 capable. I have been told either Precision 6870 A/R 1.00 with Artec 70mm Big Daddy "V" Band Manifold or Garrett G35-1050 A/R 1.05 using T4 Twin Scroll. Both of these sound great But as this will only be a street car, Which Turbo set up will give the best Response or should I stick with Twin EFR'S?

If wanting quickest spool/response then its twin scroll efr set up. For >750hp, efr8474 or larger. If not efrs, g35-900 or g40-1150, if wanting cheaper, gtw3884r-67mm or gbc37-900, all shoud be in twin scroll set up for better spool/response. Skip g35-1050 at it has mismatched wheels, compressor too large for turbine.

I run a gen2 6466 1.00ar divided T4 on my 2.8 and it spools wickedly fast. If you're aiming for 750-800whp, I think it's a great choice. If you're looking at 900whp+ I'd go 6870. 

 

If wanting quickest spool/response then its twin scroll efr set up. For >750hp, efr8474 or larger. If not efrs, g35-900 or g40-1150, if wanting cheaper, gtw3884r-67mm or gbc37-900, all shoud be in twin scroll set up for better spool/response. Skip g35-1050 at it has mismatched wheels, compressor too large for turbine.



Road car, Borg Warner is the only answer. Anyone who thinks anything responds great has not felt the transient differences that That Ti-Al wheel provides. The turbo is the single most important part of anything. The right turbo will have much more effect than going from 2.6 to 2.8L.

 

  • Like 1

hey mate 

 

check my build thread i have pushed the 6466 as far as i can go on a HKS 2.8 with Rams head and 276 cams

got 820whp and all in just after 4k 

good for a 9.6@146 

copped years of proper motorsport use 

I am going to swap over to a g35900 now just for shits and giggles to be honest and see how it all compares 

but i do recommend a 6466 on a 2.8 as a really good allrounder turbo 

  • Like 2
24 minutes ago, Dr Evil said:

Hi Hattori, The G35-900 was also one of the favorites, please let me know how you get on :) I need to order something in the next few weeks. Also, What Manifold? Hypertune T4 or 6Boost T4 or Artec V band?

Wouldn't the manifold you buy be dictated by the turbo and rear housing you choose? 

You're chasing 'early spool' so it would make sense to choose a T4 TS manifold for a T4 TS turbine housing.

2 hours ago, Dr Evil said:

Hi Hattori, The G35-900 was also one of the favorites, please let me know how you get on :) I need to order something in the next few weeks. Also, What Manifold? Hypertune T4 or 6Boost T4 or Artec V band?

I went 6boost t4 twin scroll

 

1.15 rear housing I gained alot and lost minimal response 

 

2013 my options were 6boost or a bespoke manifold so that's why I went 6boost. 

Ild try Artech if I went again

 

  • 2 weeks later...

I am currently building a Nitto 2.8, GSC S1 Billet cams, Headgames pocket port/shimless bucket head in an R33 GTR. Shooting to make a reasonably responsive 850whp for a street car when in "kill mode". I wanted to go the EFR 8474 Black series, but they are no longer making certain EFR's until further notice. I ended up getting an awesome deal on a Divided T4, 1.0 AR turbine Precision 6870 with the T51r mod for $2100 brand new. This turbo is very similar in size to the EFR 8474, but obviously uses different materials. I think spool should be around the same (all in around 4,500rpm) and I will be revving to about 8,500. Also using a PPG sequential, so once its spooled, it should stay there, which is why I may consider going larger turbo later. This will all be sitting on a Full-Race divided T4 twin 44mm wastegate manifold. My theory is that I will try the "smaller" Precision 6870 before jumping up to a 9180 or even 9280 EFR that are actually available. My engine is almost finished being built, so the car should be running in the next 4-6 months from now, although it wont likely be tuned on E85/full boost for a few months after initial startup. I will stay tuned and update once I have results. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...