Jump to content
SAU Community

  

170 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you don't mind my posting here instead of voting - my opinion isn't covered in the poll.

I enjoyed the old way that people could comment and post up offers on the thread so everyone else knew where they stood, also questions one person asked are seen for everyone to see.

The new way is great how you can see a photo if one is attached in a large overall view - I think this is great. I also think it's great to see a short and see if the thing has been sold all in one go.

I think part of the getting used to process is that the links used to be on the right hand side of the screen now they're on the left - I think to improve it slightly I'd have the actual products (after you choose the category) 'flatted out' a little so that they sit in the middle to the right of the screen.

Other than that the major thing really is other people being able to post up about the product - if the seller has nothing to hide they won't mind.

That's my only suggestion :D

Guest RedLineGTR

One thing I would like to mention that one thing I liked particularly how all the new threads in the old classifieds section pops up in the new threads when I鈥檓 checking out what鈥檚 new, saves me trying to check the new classifieds section very often to know if anything had been posted. My 2 Cents.

I think the new classifieds are clunky and the old system fit in a lot better with the forums and the way things are done here. I know chatting is against the rules in the For sale forums but some feedback/open questions are often good.

If it aint broke dont fix it i say. :D :D

I reckon the Old system was much better...Less people are posting up parts now With the New thread...The old system was way eaiser to contact the seller/buyer....

If The New System has to stay....make it so we can post to the buyer like the old one...

Cheers...Thats my Opinion

I reckon it should stay because I spent a few hours doing that new display template :D

It can actually be adjusted so we get one large "main" picture and the smaller thumbnails. I am not sure why the main at the moment is actually set to the same as the thumbnails :confused:

You get the Q&A down the bottom of the details guys.. you can post comments and the like just like the old system.

PM should be available though.. I only realised you couldn't PM directly from there, you have to Email them.. but that is probably a relatively simple change.

I really can't see how the old system was that much better, other than the fact that everybody was used to it. Name one feature that was so useful that isn't available in the new one?

I voted for the old system. I wouldn't say it was much better though, I just preffered it that way. If it aint broke, don't fix it. That's my take, having said that, the new system certainly has some advantages, but i guess if the bulk of people don't like it then it's not really a step forward.

Good work either way mate. I'll be happy no matter what the outcome.

Richard

I like being able to browse via images.. and see what is what at a glance on the list page, rather than wade into everything. It actually makes things a bit more efficient.

It also greatly encourages people to upload photos for their goods, to get people to look at their ads. Those that don't just get a bland "no photos available". Its a great way to get people to upload.

i voted for the old system

alternatively you could modify the old system to reflect how you want the changes to act without doing a complete re-do of hte for sale section

oh, and have you considered banning the use of 'bump'?? it really serves no purpose and it gets annoying when someone 'bumps' 3 times a day untill their item is sold...

cheers,

Warren.

Obviously the new system has added functionality which is all good and well, but the look and feel leaves a lot to be desired. The old system was basic, simple and it worked.

Making it easy as possible, with a friendly interface is the key - either way i vote for the old system to be returned.

I didn't vote, because I don't care either way.

However, if going back to the old for sale section will stop things like this

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=55491

then i'm all for it :D

Name one feature that was so useful that isn't available in the new one?

Per a couple of posts in this thread, classifieds are NOT included in new post searches, so I never see them.

I appreciate the effort that has been put into the new feature....but as they say in the classics....the tribe has spoken :D

lotta dickheads.. just instant ban if they do that.. lol

bumping is useful to give your item more prominance and make an effort (not 3 times a day.. most places have a 24 hour rule). I've had stuff advertised for weeks and weeks and somebody goes "shit you had that?" and I have to tell them "I advertised it in the forums for like a month!!".

Under this new system, people only look at the new ads, as people are usually too lazy to search back for other items they may be interested in.

Per a couple of posts in this thread, classifieds are NOT included in new post searches, so I never see them.

Then you might have to actually visit the classifides system to see the new posts once a day then .. not that hard :D

Damn tribe! people get so used to their old way of doing things, any change is all too difficult. Old buggers! :)

keepkeepkeep... seems more organised this way, to me... search function works (i'm always searching r32 - very effective compared to vb search)... the main info i want to see first is always there, and people never forget these fundamentals of selling :) : location and price mostly... what i would really love is an ordering system (order by price), or filtering system (filter to only vic for example) - but this may be a little complicated :D

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
  • Create New...