Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone had any experience with Goodyear Revspec RS-02's?

There was a good review on them in the Wheels tyre comparison article early this year, yet it doesn't seem like anyone on here is using them.

I got relatively good price quote for them ($1154 for all 4 corners), but am I better off spending a bit extra to get the Toyo T1R's ($1370 for all 4) as it seems like quite a few people on here rate them...

Tyres will be going on an R33 GTST (front: 235/45/17, rear: 255/40/17) with around 270rwkw.

Can anyone help? ;)

Anyone??? :)

Well here is my 2yen about that.....

There is absolutely no point in buying a great performance car and then putting crap tyres on them.  And the Falken 326 are crap.  They are basically among the cheapest tyres that you can get in big low profile sizes so compliers fit them on a lot of freshly imported cars.

The difference between a bad road tyre and a good road tyre is amazing, you really can feel it and you will enjoy your car heaps more with decent tyres.

So.....enough crapping on....I am saying don't spend 250ea on tyres + 1000 on an intercooler, spend 500ea on tyres instead you will love the difference.

Anyone that has been in a car on the track on race tyres will know what I mean about the difference :)

There is a massive difference, and the car will be faster for sure, but then again, since i got some t1-rs to replace my old yokos(had gone off) i sort of miss the car being edgy and powerslides ;)

Now the rear of the car is simply stuck.

I have a R31 s2 silo, not exactly high performance. The falkens seem good enough for me and are way better than the tyres I have now. I have to agree on the wet handling of the falken ziex, but he dry handling I thought was pretty good (for my car). I also cant afford $200+ tyres.

Just got my 255/40Z/R17 Toyo T1R's fitted @ $350 a pop.

I must say they stick very well. Alot like my Continential Sport Contact 2's but they were really bald.

Will post up more when I drive the T1Rs abit more.

I can't believe the prices you guys are willing to pay for ordinary old road tyres. Some of the cheap stuff is junk, but some of it is very good too. But the same goes for expensive name brand tyres. The worst tyre I've ever driven on were Pirellis. They were just downright dangerous - in the dry! I took them back the next day. And the Michelin Pilot Sports i had were pretty damn ordinary too. Not dangerous like the Pirelli, but still pretty awful.

Best value for money tyre I've used is the Simex SM8000 on an old R31 daily driver and they were as good as any Yokohama/Bridgestone/Toyo road tyre I've ever used. When I needed tyres recently for my HR30 coupe, I didn't hesitate to buy them again - 225/50*16 for $130ea retail. And my GTR is just about due for new road tyres (17"), and I know exactly what I'll be using for it too. I think they're about $170. A friend who has also been involved in motorsport for years has a WRX daily driver and uses Tornado tyres. His 225/50*16 were around $140ea, and they are just fine too - even for spirited driving on the wonderful roads around his Sunshine Coast Hinterland home. If you want to pay mega dollars for a name brand, go right ahead, but they aren't any better than alot of the cheap tyres.

Bridgestone GIII's

Had them on for a week and done a few hundred km on them.

235/45 17

So far very impressed.

Noisy tyre at 40-50km, but at 60 you can't hear them.

Grip - amazing. Cornering is spot on, very predictable handling, and corner speeds are noticeably higher (based on some well-known laps in an industrial area).

Wet performance was solid, really had to try to lock them up, which was dead easy on previous rubber.

I'd give them an 8-9/10 overall, but i've never driven on S-03's or T1-R's or the like to compare.

Previous tyres have been Simex (i'd rate them a 4/10) and k104's (6-7/10)

Edited by Beeble

Currently got an Astra 2.2. Runnin Hankook K104 sport's on it. They're pretty good, I can still take em to their limits around a few corners, but not sure if it the tyres or the car (it's a sporty astra, but its still an astra).

Gettin a R32 GTS-T next week *fingers crossed pre-purchase inspection goes ok* Lookin to get some new wheels and tyres for it.

Possibly some Konig Trouble rims in 18x8 ($425/each).

post-22691-1132365805.jpg

And lookin at maybe some Toyo T1-R's

post-22691-1132365754.jpg

If anyone is interested in prices.

265/35ZR18 97Y - $495

225/40ZR18 87Y - ????

265/40ZR17 96Y - $420

235/45ZR17 97Y - $320

Will prob get the 265/35 18's on the rear and 225/40's on the front.

Does that sound like a good setup? Are those prices ok? I'm gettin a call back on a package deal with the wheels and tyres all from one place.

Yes the shi7 rubber just doesnt cut the mustard.You can get them to hold in for a lap or 2 but after that you are figting it for grip.

why would you expect them to? all normal street tyres are crap on the track. And not just after 1 lap - they have no grip to start with, and only get worse from there.

I purchased a set of Toyo T1R's for the front of my car the other week and am very impressed with them. Braking and steering has definately improved.

I have tried a lot of tyre places and the best prices I have found have always been Total Tyres in Oakleigh, MELBOURNE.. and no I don't work for them. These guys prices are always cheaper than their competition in my experiences, buy a good margin usually. They have a large range of tyres.. may need to go elsewhere for rims but ask them for a price anyway. These guys are not a bunch of grease monkeys either, they are careful with rims. A friend had some painted rims which 2 other places scratched (after being told to be extremely careful) and these guys haven't made a mark after numerous visits. They can install suspension too, during the week only though.

Just though I'd let you know.. If any one knows of somewhere that has cheaper prices in melbourne preferrably in the SE region then POST IT UP, I want to know.

I couldn't see one but is there a section for good tyre places stickied somewhere??

Go the T1R's!

Edited by Fry_33

Bridgestone Grid IIs 215/60/15

Responsiveness - 9/10

Dry grip - 8/10

Wet grip - 7/10

Value for Money - ??

These tyres came with my 180sx (from import dealer) and were fairly second hand by the time I picked the car up. The responsiveness was outstanding. If you found yourself understeering on a corner, you wind in more lock and the tyres would do exactly as you tell it. I felt very comfortable with these tyres in the dry or the wet. In fact when it came time to replace them, I was so scared that the next set of tyres wouldn't be as good.

Bridgestone Potenza GIIIs 215/60/15

Responsiveness - 6 / 10

Dry grip - 9/10

Wet grip - 7/10

Value for money - 8/10 ($150 a tyre)

Have been fairly happy with this set of tyres. Have problems breaking traction in a straight line in the dry and even in the wet sometimes. Responsiveness was not as good as the Grid IIs, you need to make sure you take the corner at the appropriate speed. However the grip is certainly there.

Damn you lucky ppl with small widths. Cheap good tyres.

I have Dunlop Formulas (FM9Y?)

245/45/r17, all fours, r32gtr.

Very sticky, I would go back to these though very exp.

Be aware this is on a GTR

Dry 9/10

Wet 7.5/10

Value for money 5/10

Okay tyre though very exp.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...