Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lasted 2 weeks so not bad... nah to be honest the car seem to be fine just finished it n got running after 1yr off the road plus jus paid full yr rego but shit happenes!! Now need to rebuild it hopefully it won't cost much lol

  • 2 weeks later...
On 29.03.2017 at 4:00 PM, Nosure said:

R34 gtr nur

Rb28

Poncam 260

valve spring

gtx3582 0.82 ts t3

4inch front pipe 3.5inch catback

1650cc injectors

650awhp @ 28psi 

500hp on 5000 rpm

IMG_2128.JPG

Daamn huge lag make that GTX35 with small turbine on 2.8 :O

12 hours ago, Nosure said:

The 2.8 doesn't make it spool quicker a lot. But on road it feel not that laggy.  Maybe adjust the cam gear will help the spool.  

Dial in more intake advance and pull timing out before 5k to get the turbo on faster.

5 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Dial in more intake advance and pull timing out before 5k to get the turbo on faster.

Yes. Will adjust both cam gear next month. At moment both cam gears are untouched.  The strange thing is my reimax cam gear does not have any degree mark on it:(  it might make the tuning a little bit difficult. 

IMG_2308.PNG

  • 2 weeks later...

N1 Block

Tomei RB28 stroker

Tomei Poncams Type B

Tomei Gaskets - 1.2mm 8.8:1

1000cc EV14

GT2860-5

LinkG4

Splitfire coils, grade 8 plugs

Mines Super outlet Pro II elbows

Mines Frontpipe Pro

HKS Type-R Intercooler

HKS Super Turbo Exhaust

HKS Cat.

HKS Hardpipes

etc...

 

First mapping done at 1.2 Bar (1.3 Peak) running on 98 Octane - starting getting some backpressure above this but will hopefully get it to 1.5Bar with 98 octane and E85 Flex after that. 

1.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...
  • N1 Block
  • Tomei RB28 stroker
  • JUN 272 9.7mm lift cams
  • Garrett GTX2863 turbos
  • HKS Fuel rail
  • Injector Dynamics ID2000 injectors
  • Link G4+ PNP Board\
  • Haltech Flexfuel sensor
  • full racepace 3.5" exhaust (tuned length headers)
  • Other items...

First tune done to engines capabilities, second tune completed to my preference, in the interest of keeping the engine in one piece. 

Full power: 505.4kW (atw) at 27psi

Final Tune: 410kW (atw) at 22psi

IMG_4364.JPG

IMG_4365.JPG

  • Like 1

Curious to know why you would think an engine like that wouldn't live with 500rwkw on a daily basis? the power is all in the right foot and the boost controller

We have been making 450rwkw+ on a stock block and crank for years no issues. Your combo should be good for considerably more on a regular basis

Edited by ido09s
2 minutes ago, ido09s said:

Curious to know why you would think an engine like that wouldn't live with 500rwkw on a daily basis? the power is all in the right foot and the boost controller

We have been making 450+ on a stock block and crank for years no issues. You combo should be good for considerably more on a regular basis

It's not that I don't think it will, i just don't require that much power. I haven't really had a chance to open the car up to it's' maximum potential so it just seemed like a no brainer to turn it down for now. If i decide later on that it needs more go, i can always have it turned back up. 

For me, it's fast enough for the moment, so my theory here is that less power should mean less stress on components. My right foot is little bit scared of the power.

The other thing worth noting is the diff gearing has been shortened (4.375 ratios), so the car really moves. I can drive it around in 5th no problem and still have enough torque to pull from 50kph. In summary; it seemed fast enough.

1 minute ago, Steve85 said:

It's not that I don't think it will, i just don't require that much power. I haven't really had a chance to open the car up to it's' maximum potential so it just seemed like a no brainer to turn it down for now. If i decide later on that it needs more go, i can always have it turned back up. 

For me, it's fast enough for the moment, so my theory here is that less power should mean less stress on components. My right foot is little bit scared of the power.

The other thing worth noting is the diff gearing has been shortened (4.375 ratios), so the car really moves. I can drive it around in 5th no problem and still have enough torque to pull from 50kph. In summary; it seemed fast enough.

That's fair enough. I guess all you need to do is ask the tuner to turn the boost back up ;) we run an old Link G4, no +, and our boost is controlled through the ECU. Turn the air con on in our car and it doesn't loose power, it gives it another 15psi of boost :P 

You should try some 4.9's ;) We use them for drag racing but on the street they are insane. You runs out of puff pretty quickly though. Its an RB26 S14 hence the reason we can run such a ratio.

12 minutes ago, ido09s said:

You should try some 4.9's

Wait 4.9s? That's going the wrong way for my preference. :1_grinning: That must be insane... Mine tops out at about 240-260 at the moment (i can't be sure), it was doing it pretty easy at a track day (til it broke, thanks igniter!)

I do have a switch for high boost, but low boost seems mental enough for the moment.

2 minutes ago, Steve85 said:

Wait 4.9s? That's going the wrong way for my preference. :1_grinning: That must be insane... Mine tops out at about 240-260 at the moment (i can't be sure), it was doing it pretty easy at a track day (til it broke, thanks igniter!)

I do have a switch for high boost, but low boost seems mental enough for the moment.

Yeah you read right, 4.9s ;) We use the 4.1's normally but swap it over when we race it. If it would get off the line it would run some decent times but it does trap 138mph all day every day :P

 

Live life a little, run high boost :D 500rwkw is fun!!!!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...