Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for reply. That’s great result. What power it made on what psi? I’m looking for get 8374 iwg or 9180 iwg. But no result I can find.
Search my posts they are all on here including the build thread. 8374 is an incredible turbo for rb26
  • 2 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, WantGTR said:

No dyno sheet but car went 10.8@140mph. First and only pass. 

2018-07-05_07-22-172018-07-05_07-22-44

 

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

19 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

Yes i know. But mph is better than a dyno sheet. Mph doesnt lie.

  • Like 2
10 hours ago, Lithium said:

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

maybe just let us know how many rpm full boost?

  • 4 weeks later...

Fresh Dyno

1991 GTR
Stock RB26DETT
Garrett GT2860R-7 turbos
Stock R32 dumps, manifolds, etc.
Greddy downpipe
HKS Super Drager Exhaust
Custom hardpipe intakes (AFMs deleted and all inlet rubber changed to 2.5" Al piping)
Tapped a -6AN fitting into stock fuel rail
FIC 850cc injectors
93 Octane Pumpgas (USA)
BCPR7EIX plugs gapped to .025"
Haltech PnP Rev2 (love this! much better than rev1).

20.5 psig + 3 deg of timing over haltech base.

465 whp

 

480738349_Dynocharts.thumb.JPG.e9be757dde2479507cb25333f93566cc.JPG

patrick gtr 7-28-18.pdf

On 7/31/2018 at 7:06 AM, HarrisRacing said:

Fresh Dyno

1991 GTR
Stock RB26DETT
Garrett GT2860R-7 turbos
Stock R32 dumps, manifolds, etc.
Greddy downpipe
HKS Super Drager Exhaust
Custom hardpipe intakes (AFMs deleted and all inlet rubber changed to 2.5" Al piping)
Tapped a -6AN fitting into stock fuel rail
FIC 850cc injectors
93 Octane Pumpgas (USA)
BCPR7EIX plugs gapped to .025"
Haltech PnP Rev2 (love this! much better than rev1).

20.5 psig + 3 deg of timing over haltech base.

465 whp

 

480738349_Dynocharts.thumb.JPG.e9be757dde2479507cb25333f93566cc.JPG

patrick gtr 7-28-18.pdf

RWHP or AWHP?

465 HP seems a little high for a fairly standard 26 on -7's at 20 psi of boost.

Good result none the less!

 

RWHP or AWHP?
465 HP seems a little high for a fairly standard 26 on -7's at 20 psi of boost.
Good result none the less!
 
RWHP.

The car did 384 whp before the stock AFMs cut me off around 17-18 psi...and at 10 psi did about 296 whp. Haltech, cam gears (rolled in about 6 deg of overlap) and intake pipes woke it up. This dyno is pretty dang accurate. Motor runs very well.

Also I just tuned another R32 GTR on stock RB26 on tomei cam gears, 8374 EFR .92 IWG, 6 boost manifold, on pumpgas 93 octane (your 98) and it did 570 whp on 20 psi. Did 636 whp on 23 psi on E30 and ran out of injector. Also on haltech platinum.

Both cars are strong...the -7 car definitely more laggy than the EFR single car though.download_20180806_220847.jpeg
  • Like 1
480kw at 23 psi
 
Dam bald egles  can tune
This is how that car showed up on stock turbos, stock haltech igniton map and a rough (rich) fuel tune at 15-16 psi. However you want to criticize the overall power, the gains in power are undeniable with only a turbo, injectors, fuel setup, and cam gear changes.

20180629_172503.jpeg

Have a mate with the same turbo at 28 psi e85) and only 380kw

the internal gate bw r junk for bulk power  In Australia 

Americans make them sing ( thus the bald eagle comment which after discovering Cletus on YouTube I thought was a compliment) 

  • Like 2
Have a mate with the same turbo at 28 psi e85) and only 380kw
the internal gate bw r junk for bulk power  In Australia 
Americans make them sing ( thus the bald eagle comment which after discovering Cletus on YouTube I thought was a compliment) 
Whoa... there is definitely something wrong with that motor if that's all they got out of an 8374 EFR .92 iwg turbo on a stock RB26! I mean how can the iwg be to blame when it's simply a turbine housing that's still in the range of what most choose on the RB if you still stay external? (Referring to the 1.05).

I thought you were mocking me with the bald eagles comment... no sweat there I have a sense of humor (hell yeah brother).

I'll get some videos of the cars this week for y'all

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...