Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe the answer can be found in where the main focus is for each vehicle when it comes to competition. Look at where the SR is mainly used for track work vs where the RB is mainly used [not all the time, there are exceptions in every rule, but mainly]. Long and short circuit, drift, drags etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048318
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SR's used mainly for track... what about the sr 2 to 1 ratio of drift cars at nearly every drift event.

I prefer RB's because they have the potential to make more power. But sometimes I really wish Nissan got their act together and produced alloy blocks to reduce the weight factor up front.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048438
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048533
Share on other sites

SR's a ghastly designed cheaply made bag of characterless sounding tat but it is undoubtedly torquey.

I personally wouldn't pick a SR over a CA for a road/track car and I personally prefer the RB25/26 in a S13 to either of them.

Re: the RS13 with a RB handling comments. We get this all the time on the UK SXOC. "The weight distribution is all wrong blah blah". Haven't cornerweighted my own car yet but I have seen cornerweight figures from another RB25 powered RS13 and although overall weight is obviously up weight distribution-wise they have a very similar f/r split to a S14 with a SR20DET.

They actually handle very well but theres definitely a wrong way and a right way to build them and set them up. I've been lucky enough to compare mine to a few others over here and the difference in handling was very noticeable.

When set up properly a RB up front actually adds some much needed feel to the steering and improves front end grip. Mine is noticeably less understeerey in the wet and dry on road and track than its identically suspensioned CA-powered sister car.

IMHO the RB really suits the 13, shame Nissan didn't have the balls to do one themselves. :thumbsup:

Edited by mambastu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048587
Share on other sites

I'd take the rb20 every time purely for the sound. The noise is very important if its a road going car and I want to enjoy the experience. I still stand by that the rb20 is the best sounding rb ever.

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048765
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048824
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

How can you say its inferior in stock form? What do std turbo S13/14s make at the wheels? My point is a motor will only be as good as the gear Nissan gave it at the factory. In which case look at the R31 GTSR. There are RB20 with std turbo and intercoolers making 250rwkws :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048911
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

of all the years ive been in the silvia scene, i only know of 1 broken rocker. whats wrong with the chain drive ?!

not surprisingly there is alot of bias here :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049018
Share on other sites

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm RB20.....revs and engine note get me there :D

Not a fan of the SR, engine note sucks the wang and id rather have a tough as guts FJ20.

Good to see someone compared an RB30 to a 2JZ......always good to compare an engine origionally designed as a diesel to an over engineered freak :)

*Wheezy watches the pot stir

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049172
Share on other sites

It's simple, SR's have rockers...

:) cheers :)

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049189
Share on other sites

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Every SR20 has rockers, GTiR use solid lifters rather then hydrlic (spelling). I dont see the big drama with rockers unless you want to rev over 9000. They have benifites like you can fit massive cams with no modification to head etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049213
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...