Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI Charlie, going to have a look at Chavey's build, thanks

I see Piggaz is just ordering the OS88 box , cannot wait to hear how they go as a DD and Paul's car should be a good test and I believe he likes to drive hard as he keeps braking things, sorry Paul :)

I dropped my car into the workshop on Tuesday and now the wait starts :(

After listening to you blokes I ended up confirming some changes to the driveline and will see how the Box goes or when it goes before I change it.Better start putting the $$$$s away

Gone with the Coppermix C Spec Twin(over 700HP), Nismo slave cylinder, Quaife front diff , modifying the Trannie and already have a Nismo 2-way LSD /back.

The boys said to try the Unigroup 260 10.8 cams as they will give me more air, Better springs and retainers, cleaning the head up, oversized valves. Staying with the PT6262 B Turbo (over 700hP), maybe a larger back housing depending on the results.

Just waiting to see how the Walbro 460lph goes when the tune is being done and work off the results

RB30 Block has been modified. Plus all of the other part to go with the Nitto 3.2 Stroker Kit to make it a strong motor all round.

Going to have to make it stop now, Piggaz suggested I look at the Endless Brakes as they are strong and still work OK cold for a DD.

While they are doing the job I am having the Haltech Flex Fuel Sensor tuned in with the build , just in case, well you never know what you are going to want in the future, I was happy with the way it was, well for a few weeks ,haha

It will be around 400awkw, no big turbo/s or big cams, response and linear power from the start to the limiter, well :/

all this and no EFR ?

I guess only time will tell how it all works together, the worst option is to change the turbo, then flog it off to get a couple of $$$s back :)

I just hated the idea of changing it, just put it in and it is good for 700HP + and as the was made a huge difference how the car drives, so I want to see how it goes as I could not find a comparison, so I guess I will be the first with the TP6262 on a 3.2 stroker :)

I'd be interested knowing how many people making big hp on a single use WG on the manifold vs WG on turbo housing. Particularly how it results to boost control/spool times/spool response etc.

I'd be interested knowing how many people making big hp on a single use WG on the manifold vs WG on turbo housing. Particularly how it results to boost control/spool times/spool response etc.

Would be interesting but I don't think it will ever happen. I can't see 2 people having an identical setup (except gate position) to compare, or someone swapping gate position just to compare.

  • 4 months later...

I'm uploading my result here. This is a newly developed SAT ATR45 turbocharger. The engine is fully stock, unopened. Using factory cams, and factory cam gears. This is a single turbo, externally gated on E85 fuel. It is pretty good to drive on road.

Power n Response against factory twins:

powervsstock2.JPG

powervsstock.JPG

no, it is pretty high. I think dynopack might be a hub dyno.

If I am reading the last graph correctly the standard turbo(purple?) is at 18psi which is high for a standard turbo.

my race car makes less than that with r32 n1s at standard boost (12psi).

no, it is pretty high. I think dynopack might be a hub dyno.

If I am reading the last graph correctly the standard turbo(purple?) is at 18psi which is high for a standard turbo.

my race car makes less than that with r32 n1s at standard boost (12psi).

Nah 360ish is normal for 15psi on stock R33 GTR turbos, pushing a bit more boost should see what Stao makes.

In saying that, we had a PTE 5858 on a RB25 NEO that was all over that SAT ATR45 on less boost

In saying that, Stao that turbo

I make 261rwkw on 16psi and 293rwkw on 19psi on a chassis dyno from stockers and with a few 125mph passes would confirm that power

So 275rwkw from 18psi seems about right, though I do believe the Dynapack is a hub dyno so that might be low :/

Would like to see a graph using the same boost level though

I make 261rwkw on 16psi and 293rwkw on 19psi on a chassis dyno from stockers and with a few 125mph passes would confirm that power

So 275rwkw from 18psi seems about right, though I do believe the Dynapack is a hub dyno so that might be low :/

Would like to see a graph using the same boost level though

866FE882-D5CD-41AE-9988-94F6E6A306B9_zps

Was waiting for you to say something. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...