Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All comments are welcome, between the two of us we've built a few of these, but are by no means definitive experts and always welcome ideas.

Turbos are under debate at the moment. We've got a set of 2530's, but I'm seriously thinking about a set of similar low mounts with an external wastegate.

I'm a big believer in punch over power for most tracks and hill climbs, but there's no question that ultimately, you need herbs to really get the times down. Hopefully this will give us the best of both worlds with the low down punch, with the external helping the top end when internals start to show their weaknesses.

Time and testing will tell.

I'll measure up the cage piping and post it up. Won't be able to do it for a little while. It's tarped up in this rain.

Rob is a master with the welder and building cages. No joint has been done without serious thought. He's been making them for 20 years and it's amazing how much thought goes into them. It's not just a case of putting bars and crosses everywhere, but really covering everywhere the cage has a bend and making sure that all the different stresses are reduced wherever possible.

We should start a pool on the end weight.

No carbon fiber in this thing, not in the budget, but it's amazing the weight that comes out of the things you wouldn't normaly consider.

For those thinking on going the weight route, a couple of surprising things.

  • There's not a lot of weight in the front and rear windscreens, but there is huge weight in the door windows because the winding mechanism and pillar less doors windows are really heavy.
  • The boot with spoiler is huge dead weight. Probably about 25kgs in the 2. Not easy to find or make a replacement, but a huge savings, and the mounding point for the spoiler is pretty poor from factory.
  • You've heard about taking the spare out to save weight, we'll try the spare tub! Weighs more than the wheel.

I'd love to see 1250kgs, but realistically, getting below 1300 is going to be tricky and expensive. The cradles and running gear are heavy and there's not a lot of alternative on a budget. You can only take so much out before you have nothing left to mount and engine to. Not much we can do with engine and gearbox either.

My guess is about 1325.

Comments welcome

3 - gone and never coming back. we are keeping the brake booster though - i have driven a gtr on the track without the booster and it was a disaster.

Harden up! lol, get rid of the booster. If you're left foot braking between corners and on/off the power you'll want a consistant pedal, and you can't get that with a booster.

As for the rest of it, you have me salivating, wishing I had the room to do my own project...

Thanks guys :thumbsup:

great work guys i love these buildup threads they make me want to get into a similiar project myself, im suprised about the tyre well being so heavy thats a good find, i had a mate do a similiar project to a ma70 supra (strip it excessively for trackwork) and he managed to get it from the factory weight of 1600kg (something like that), down to an amazing 1180kg, its pretty much got only the essential parts and no excess wiring etc, this weight was without the cage though so that would add in abit of weight. Just goes to show how much excess weight can be removed from a car when u go the whole way starting from scratch and just using the parts needed.

Im guessing 1350kg because that cage looks pretty substantial :thumbsup:

how much would a cage like the one in your car weigh?

do u guys have any idea what the complete engine and box weigh roughly?

how much did all the sound deadening weigh up to or didnt u bother weighing it?

how come u guys never consider a smaller single turbo and ext gate? response as good as twins and the ease of working on it cant be ignored imo, simplifes things a hell of a lot. only need 1 dump pipe as well :(

good luck and look forward to the updates

Edited by unique1

got ours down to 1360kg.... as shown recently in HPI car retains all front trims including carpet,headlining and even sunvisors. Both doors are as per factory items including mega weight in door intrusion bars. Only really deleted heater box, air con system, hicas system and ABS. Only body deadner inside from b pillar rearward removed and none under car has been stripped (yet).

so sub 1300kg may be achieveable.

Also...that cage looks very close to what Gibson Motorsport ran in their cars.

looks great mark and dundan. you guys will have a ball on this one without that nasty rule book holding you down.

depending on how much it costs for the perspex and how hard it is to get a nice result it may be worth buying some pre-made japanese lexan or perspex windows as they are not really all that expensive in japan. I have bought some before for a mate and I was surprised how cheap they were.

how much did all the sound deadening weigh up to or didnt u bother weighing it?

I recently strip all the sound deadner out of my GTS-t ( i assume that the GTR would be the same) and it weighed a total of 26kg :thumbsup:

That was a fun job (hint always use the dry ice method, much easyer!!!)

Cheers

Ross

Holly crap I didnt reslise it was this serious of a build!!

*subcribes to thread* :D

How often do you guys work on the car Duncan?

I wouldnt mind popping over sometime and learning some stuff :)

Awesome build fellas. I want to do something like this with some mates eventually with an s13 or 180 or similar. The only thing stopping us is the money and most of the know how lol. I look forward to seeing the finished results.

Edited by Cooper

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...