Jump to content
SAU Community

Which Stroker Kit  

177 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Tomei hasnt released that much info on rating but i have reading up on it alot and seem find its rating is about 600ps (441kW) to 800ps ( 588.40KW)

anyone making over 400kw in there GTR will be more than happy to keep it at that level. so theres no point getin the HKS step 2 or 3 for that extra pwoer level

you say you payed $7500 for the HKS kit which is not bad. but i would of gone the Tomei kit for that same price

The 7k TOMEI 2.8 stroker kit is cheaper as it does not have a full 12 counter weight crankshaft it only has a 8 counterweight crank so for circuit use i would prefer the HKS step 2 2.8 or the jun 2.7 as both have the full 12 counterweight crank.

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

u guys are missing the point the guys wants to know which is the best stroker kit out there.

i think the Tomei is still better than the HKS. as the tomei item has a Bore 87.5mm with brings the cc to 2807 $ 7,649 which is cheaper than the HKS step 3

which the HKS stroker kit Step 1 Bore 86.0mm, Step 2 Bore 86.5mm, Step 3 Bore 87.0mm $10,000

the steps of the stroker kits have nothing to do with bore size. you have the option of 86.5 and 87mm with most of them.. some have 87.5 and 88mm which i wouldnt think about doin if your pushing a motor anywhere near its limits while hoping for reliability

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

the step 1 2 and 3's mean more than just bore size. heres the hks kits brief run down

Step 1, pistons rods and crank

Step 2, pistons with coatings rods and crank

Step 3, pistons with coatings and billet rods and crank

the tomei step 1 and step 2 are slightly different with the step 2 having the cooling channel pistons

Are cooling channel pistons REALLY needed?

I have the Tomei stroker with NON cooling channel pistons and have had no problems what so ever.... Thats with a "tight" 2 thou piston to bore clearence.

they have everything to do with bore size. "Cubic centimeters. It's a measure of displacement. Displacement is "bore x stoke" or the cross-sectional area of the cylinder times the distance the piston travels in the cylinder. The larger the bore and the stroke, the greater the displacement"

end of the day people are pay alot of my for a stroker kit and they want the most out of it. yes reliability is one of them but having more cc with a bigger bore size always win's.

if the 3.4L stroker was available i wouldn't mind giving it a go. due to the displacement you wouldn't have to rev the engine to get a lot of torque and power but if you balance the thing well it should have no issues doing 8000rpm there are many RB30 engines doing 8000-8500 rpm how much more do you need?

^they certainly arent cheap by any means.

Out of interest how much does it cost to to fully prepare a stock crank for your average tough drag/track engine?

Martin HKS, whilst your here, can you comment on the power handling of the HKS step1/2? ive read that they seemingly use very similar components in the kits, and that even a step one kit should be good for far more than its 600ps rating. This would be good to know as there is a significant price diference.

Here is the HKS breakdown on kits. We all know you can run them a lot harder than HKS recommend just like stock.

They are all 2771cc displacement using 77.7mm full counter stroke crankshaft and 87.0mm bore. Step 1 and 2 have 21mm pin while the discontinued Step 3 used 22.0mm.

HKS Step 1 = Forged Crank, Piston, and Forged Conrods

HKS Step 2 = Lightened Forged Crank, Nickel Coated Pistons with Titanium Coated Rings and Forged Conrods

HKS Step 3 = Billet Crank, Nickel Coated Pistons with Titanium Coated Rings and Forged Conrods in 22mm

Cheers

Marty

Edited by Martin HKS

From the sounds of things, I'm starting to look into the JUN 2.7 kit, HKS and Tomei 2.8(its kinda hard for me to get rb30 parts here in America hehe). From What I have seen the guys from CRD like to run that kit. I so want something that "revs like a sewing machine" LoL. The only issue now is my turbo size(I'm starting to realize that its always something else that needs to be figured out after you answer one questions). I want to go top mount twins that are externally gated, but im not sure what size turbo I should get. I've seen a lot of cars (via youtube, streetfire, magazines, etc.) running these big twins on top like in this video,

, but I can never find what size they are.

Its kinda funny with this forum though becuase I wait up all night for a response browsing this forum, but I always seem to forget you guys over there are on a completely different time zone that I am :( LoL!

But in all seriousness, this is the best, most helpful, nonbashing forum I've ever been on. And I really do appreciate all the help you guys have given me thus far and know I can always count on the right answer from you guys. :)

Being a broke ass Skyline owner, i have to question is the extra little bit of response and the extra few kws really worth the expense? I mean, have a holiday at Lake Como and have a 370rwkws rebuild, or sit at home and hope you can feel the difference between "fark me dead" quick and "i cant feel the difference" quick but the clock says i am going quicker?

Being a broke ass Skyline owner, i have to question is the extra little bit of response and the extra few kws really worth the expense? I mean, have a holiday at Lake Como and have a 370rwkws rebuild, or sit at home and hope you can feel the difference between "fark me dead" quick and "i cant feel the difference" quick but the clock says i am going quicker?

This is why I said go RB30, you can blatently tell the difference. One of the ones RIPS in NZ built for a customer makes near 500kw @ wheels on pump gas, and has more power EVERYWHERE than what it did on the stock R34 turbos. If he replicated the exact same turbo/cam/power level on the RB26 then it'd be a different situation altogether.

The cool thing about extra displacement is that it has more torque all by itself, if you add boost it just piles it on - if the RB30 had the same boost curve as an RB26 it'd make more power all the way through the rev range. The thing is, the RB30 spools the turbo(s) harder as well so it will make even more power everywhere in the rev range - so you may as well counter that and get an even bigger turbo which is the same if not a little laggier than the ones on the RB26, make more power/response all the way through the rev range, and make a metric crap load more up top with no compromise.

This is why I said go RB30, you can blatently tell the difference. One of the ones RIPS in NZ built for a customer makes near 500kw @ wheels on pump gas, and has more power EVERYWHERE than what it did on the stock R34 turbos. If he replicated the exact same turbo/cam/power level on the RB26 then it'd be a different situation altogether.

The cool thing about extra displacement is that it has more torque all by itself, if you add boost it just piles it on - if the RB30 had the same boost curve as an RB26 it'd make more power all the way through the rev range. The thing is, the RB30 spools the turbo(s) harder as well so it will make even more power everywhere in the rev range - so you may as well counter that and get an even bigger turbo which is the same if not a little laggier than the ones on the RB26, make more power/response all the way through the rev range, and make a metric crap load more up top with no compromise.

As I have perviously states in one of my pervious statements, It is dam near impossible for me to get my hands on an RB30 bottom end LoL. And I'm sure as hell not paying our my arse hole for the OS Giken Kit no matter how many people say how good it is LoL.

But the RB30 would be my choice if I wanted to do with a BIG signle LoL.

I'm just so undecided on what I would like this build to result in .... I've just got so many thoughts going through my head with all these possibilities LoL :3some:

9's can be done quite easy with a well built engine using mostly stock components...Take our old set-up as an example.

STD 05U block

86mm Aries pistons

STD rods

STD crank

Mildly ported head

STD valves

STD springs

STD retainers

Tomei 1.2mm head gasket

Tomei oil restrictor

Tomei cams 260 9.15mm

Tomei sump baffle

N1 oil pump

N1 water pump

This ran low 10's with full weight 1600kg+ including driver using HKS 2530 low mounts and running Federal street rubber.

Car was ran flat out for 3 years before the rear turbo failed due to oil starvation (blocked oil feed) and when the engine was pulled down it was in perfect order.

The addition of one or more of the following would have seen high 9's

Bigger turbo's

Better rubber

Lighter car

Dog gearbox

NOS kit

Better driver

Edited by DiRTgarage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...