Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The rear wheels are not in a slip event if the dyno allows the front wheels to match speed... Even for a split second :)

there are a few other factors that govern GTR all wheel drive though. not just wheel speed difference between front and rear. but consider that the wheels are driving the dyno not the other way round so yes as you start the car rolling teh rears are moving but the fronts aren't, the ecu then tells the transfer case to pressurise and torque is transferred to the front. anyway, most awd dynos can give you a reading for the front and rear.

there are a few other factors that govern GTR all wheel drive though. not just wheel speed difference between front and rear. but consider that the wheels are driving the dyno not the other way round so yes as you start the car rolling teh rears are moving but the fronts aren't, the ecu then tells the transfer case to pressurise and torque is transferred to the front. anyway, most awd dynos can give you a reading for the front and rear.

Yeah it's not the end of the world either way!

R32's are good because you can flick the switch :)

Yeah it's not the end of the world either way!

R32's are good because you can flick the switch :)

Yeah but if you truly lose <10kw why would you do it?

skidz? :happy:

Only time I've pulled fuse was driving home with a broken front drive shaft. (Mounts) - Mind you, it DID take me a few months to fix it.. :thumbsup:

Edited by GTRPowa

there are a few other factors that govern GTR all wheel drive though. not just wheel speed difference between front and rear. but consider that the wheels are driving the dyno not the other way round so yes as you start the car rolling teh rears are moving but the fronts aren't, the ecu then tells the transfer case to pressurise and torque is transferred to the front. anyway, most awd dynos can give you a reading for the front and rear.

is it possible that the computer takes power out when its running in rwd ? then puts bak in when awd ?

if u run the car in awd then rwd on the same dyno and the result is the same, that means the dyno is equalling it out bcos it knows whats happening ? where as if u ran the car on an awd dyno then went around the corner to somewhere else and ran it in rwd it would be totally different ? and yes i know different dynos show differently.

Bloody hell don't start the fixed vs percentage debate again. There like a 10 page thread on it.

Percentage loss is a good way to work out factory approximate drivetrain losses. When you start making 3, 4 or even 5 times the factory power levels, those percentages are not logical any more. There was a big thing on it here, once again, a lot of people agreeing to disagree.

My arguement is you can't say that a drag car making 3000hp at the wheels is still going to have a 20% drivetrain loss coz that's BS

The most accurate models I've seen based on lots of data use a percentage loss + a fixed component, but even then it is only accurate for a certain range because as you said, you cant be making 3000hp and expect 20% drivetrain loss.

Like a lot of models they are only accurate in a small range.

Edited by Rolls

nah it's no where near that much. 400rwkw is about 375-380awkw or so. if you've got 301awkw you would be about 320-325rwkw on most dynos. there is not much difference between AWKW and RWKW on dyno dynamics dynos. certainly not 15%. and it's not a fixxed percentage anywway. the gap does widen a little bit the higher the power level but it's not linear. like it might be 20kw difference at 200kw and only 25kw at 400kw. there is no fixed answer. regardless of that even just different dynos vary a bit even when all reading RWKW or AWKW.

I got 294awkw and 307rwkw (R32 GTR). So, pretty close!

all depends the condition of the transfer case... but on standard transfer cases its 10kw difference max... a modded transfer case can increase the awkw > rwkw difference... but on some older 32's with worn cases there is zero difference

anything more than 10-20kw is an exaggeration IMHO

Yeah it's not the end of the world either way!

R32's are good because you can flick the switch :)

agree on both points. yes it's not the end of the world, and yes flipping the AWD/2WD switch is fun. :)

is it possible that the computer takes power out when its running in rwd ? then puts bak in when awd ?

no it the ecu doesn't 'remove' power when you put the system into RWD. it just sends all the power the engine makes to the rear wheels. the reason you get a little less power when the car is in AWD is that there is a parasitic power loss in the transfer case, front shaft and front diff. it's not much though and certainly not 50kw on a car making 400kw.

if u run the car in awd then rwd on the same dyno and the result is the same, that means the dyno is equalling it out bcos it knows whats happening ? where as if u ran the car on an awd dyno then went around the corner to somewhere else and ran it in rwd it would be totally different ? and yes i know different dynos show differently.

no it makes no difference. an AWD dyno dynamics dynamometer is basically 2 "2WD" units together. so you can run it in awd using both sets of rollers, and then simply run it in RWD using only the rear set (with the car in RWD mode). The dyno doesn't "know" what you're doing. it's exactly the same as "going around the corner to a RWD dyno". they operate exactly the same way.

I got 294awkw and 307rwkw (R32 GTR). So, pretty close!

yeah that's more like it. very typical result for a GTR at that power level for AWD vs RWD. god if it were 50kw as some people claim imagine how fast the car would feel when you switched to 2WD mode! you'd suddenly be free of the 50kw drivetrain power loss and your car would be a rocket ship. that's the easiest way to tell. any GTR I've run on the road between AWD and RWD you can tell it accelerates (when rolling) a little better in RWD (providing you have traction at that power level), just enough that you can notice something, but not a huge difference. which again backs up the evidence that's it's a handful of kw's at most 'normal' power levels.

haha very funny :)

mine does that off idle

That is the dream.

Who knows when you're going to need to rip a burn out and when that time comes, do you really want to be wasting precious smoky seconds with things like 'spooling the engine up' and 'clutch dumping'

Didn't think so.

I'll throw up my little 2 cents with this 4WD vs RWD garbage.

On unigroups dyno a few years ago I made 370 RWKW.

One week later I made 361 AWKW on Rigoli's dyno at a Dyno day.

I realise they are different dynos's and stuff but they are my results.

if i could judge the difference between rwd & awd that would be good - rwd mode is stupid though, 3rd gear has no traction what so ever

yeah I know that's a problem when you have 400kw! try getting on it hard in 4th gear it should have plenty traction in RWD at those speeds, then try in AWD. you will find it feels a bit quicker in RWD but it's not a huge amount. if it were really 50kw I would say find some stickier rear tyres, cut off the transfer case and enjoy the cheapest 50kw we will ever make! :)

WELL WHEN MINE WAS TUNED IT WAS 375AWKW. dyno comp did 376rwkw.. so f**k all. bear in mind that the skyline has a locked center when on a dyno.. if the transfer was slipping i would expect to see a differance.. not a viscous coupling sapping power.

Further reading on trash forums, I found a bright spark with a convincing way of saying the drive train losses are fixed, what with all the articles/forum threads around talking about percentage losses.

Eg: You might make 200kw at the engine, and 140kw at the wheels. Then if you make 400kw at the engine, you'll make around 340kw at the wheels. Excuse the fact some of you probably know this, but I'd assume lots of people (myself included) think about fixed percentages.

And if that's the case, then the AWD mode on GTR's would used a fixed amount, instead of a percentage too. The pieces come together! :D

Edit: Excuse the fact if it's posted somewhere here, but I haven't seen it, and in fact, I've never read it this way until today... And I read forums a bit too..

So a 100kw car makes -60awkw???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The German place in Cabramatta was rock solid, fresh pretzel cooked to order back then. Then it went all quiet, after all the poker machines were removed, then I believe it closed for good. I did drive past the other week and noticed outdoor lighting a big screen, but no idea what is there now.  
    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
×
×
  • Create New...