Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yo Stao

I have your ~2010 model atr43g3, which you high flowed into a ss2 around 2013.

Thats on my 34 at the moment ( your new ss2 sounds to good to pass up, i want it now lol )

Now onto my question, i have got a patrol that is getting a rb25 transplant.

Obviously i want more power in it so it can actually lug around the 3 tons, but i think the SS2 or possibly even the highflow op6 will be to laggy for what i need.

I was wondering if you have anything that could get boost on early, earlier the better, but still make some decent power.

Close to 2500-3000 rpm is what im hoping for .

^ive got the 21u highflow on mine. Made 248rwkw @18psi with a quiet restrictive nismo 3 inch exhaust and return flow cooler. Full boost @ 3450rpm. Tuner says could make 10-15kw more with better fliwing exhaust.

Following up about the 3inches diameter restriction problem with internally gated ATR45. I've made a simple Tee pieces that is attached to the front pipe. It is spring loaded, so gas pressure forces the valve open once it builds up to certain point, while remains shut and quite on cruise.

piecestogether.jpg

springopen.jpg

frontpipevalveopen.jpg

frontpipeshut.jpg

  • Like 1

Some further updates. Those are the CNC machined billet internal gate assemblies made for Nissan RB25det high flows. This upgrade will help stabilising boost and should pickup few extra KWs working with small 21U turbine housings also. This is usually a $200 upgrade job, Now comes standard with all RB20/25det high flows at no extra cost, that is $850 including braided oil feeding line.

gate.jpg

gateopen.jpg

gateshut.jpg

  • Like 1

Yes, All RB25det and RB20det engines

I'm not sure that upgrade is actually required. I'm not having any boost control issue with my hi flow and I'm not awaren of anyone else having boost control issues but if you want to offer it for free, I don't think anyone is going to argue with you as long as it works properly.

Bigger waste gate keeps the turbine cooler on tracks and possibly an extra degree of timing. Did that on John Reco's WTAC car this year and it was very successful.

Just had time to install the new ATR43SS2 with the DIY dump bleeder.

comphousing2.jpg

turbooncar1.jpg

frontpipevalveopen.jpg

Car is currently running the ATR45SAT's tune, its booked for tuning on the 9th. The response is similar to the older SS2 but making way more power. That Bleeder vale have made a noticeable difference to upper rev torque, the car pulls all the way to red line. That bleeder is definitely a worth while DIY to do. Will upload results once dyno tuned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...