Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats the big difference between the ss1PU and ss1.5PU?? They are both similarly rated on the website, which ones better for the street?

From results on Stao's car they both had similar response except the SS1.5PU goes on to make 15-20rwkw on less boost. So the answer to me is the SS1.5PU in every way. Pity I bought the SS1 before it came out lol.

SS1PU is the latest version. The Model 1.5xx is the older trailing version. If you are after a responsive 250~280rwkws the SS1PU is the one to get.

LOLZ how did you come up with that turbo?? That turbo would have full boost a fair bit over 5000rpm. Why not run a GT45 turbo on 0.2psi...

As birds said, you want something much much smaller. Either a highflow or an SS1.5PU would be my choices.

Sorry i'm not expert on turbos, I was under the impression RB25de + T come boost very fast due to high compression, coupled with E85, was thinking of something that is a bit laggier to avoid endless wheel spin in a gts-t. Didn't realise it would be that bad :S.

Sorry i'm not expert on turbos, I was under the impression RB25de + T come boost very fast due to high compression, coupled with E85, was thinking of something that is a bit laggier to avoid endless wheel spin in a gts-t. Didn't realise it would be that bad :S.

Sorry mate might have been a bit harsh. To avoid wheelspin then you actually want a smaller turbo like an SS1.5 which comes on really linear and smooth. I have 265 wide semi slick tyres and cant spin them with full throttle in 2nd gear (E85 and 280rwkw). Whereas I had a larger ATR43G3 turbo before and that made the same power ~280rwkw but that would wheelspin in 2nd because it was lag and then a sudden hit.

You do want to make sure you dont choke the engine with a tiny turbo/housing but the SS1.5 wont and you will only need very low boost to make 250rwkw.

Just checked the prices so all good. I'm going for the Ss1pu just for the reasponse + less strain on everything to pull a figure like 250rwkw

Thanks for the help now I just gotta start saving the coin

Hope so.. it's going in a 32 too ;).

http://digi-hardware.com/atr43.html

I'm guessing I want a g4 in a .82 housing.

Profile G4 T3 .82 / 1.0: 600HP $1250

Mate I think you will happily make your desired results with a PU high flow AND on 98 ron. No need for a big fk off turbo and definitely do not need to hassle of E85.

98 you can fill it up anywhere you go, no need to worry. The PU highflow will also look almost exactly like a stock turbo and will be the closest thing to a true bolt on you can get. Its good for over 280kw i believe so you should get 250 on the DE without hassle.

Add E85 to that and your probably talking 300 but I wouldnt bother.

Sorry mate might have been a bit harsh. To avoid wheelspin then you actually want a smaller turbo like an SS1.5 which comes on really linear and smooth. I have 265 wide semi slick tyres and cant spin them with full throttle in 2nd gear (E85 and 280rwkw). Whereas I had a larger ATR43G3 turbo before and that made the same power ~280rwkw but that would wheelspin in 2nd because it was lag and then a sudden hit.

You do want to make sure you dont choke the engine with a tiny turbo/housing but the SS1PU wont and you will only need very low boost to make 250rwkw.

Mate I think you will happily make your desired results with a PU high flow AND on 98 ron. No need for a big fk off turbo and definitely do not need to hassle of E85.

98 you can fill it up anywhere you go, no need to worry. The PU highflow will also look almost exactly like a stock turbo and will be the closest thing to a true bolt on you can get. Its good for over 280kw i believe so you should get 250 on the DE without hassle.

Add E85 to that and your probably talking 300 but I wouldnt bother.

Yeah but the PU high flow has a lot more lag and when it hits is a lot more sudden then a SS1PU turbo. It does have the stock appearance from the front of the turbo but the street performance will be heaps better with an SS1PU. The PU high flow has a large 0.82 rear.

280rwkw sounds like a lot on 98 fuel with a high comp standard engine?? I would limit it to around 250-260rwkw on 98 fuel and then with E85 you have the extra protection from the high compression to push it further.

Mate I think you will happily make your desired results with a PU high flow AND on 98 ron. No need for a big fk off turbo and definitely do not need to hassle of E85.

98 you can fill it up anywhere you go, no need to worry. The PU highflow will also look almost exactly like a stock turbo and will be the closest thing to a true bolt on you can get. Its good for over 280kw i believe so you should get 250 on the DE without hassle.

Add E85 to that and your probably talking 300 but I wouldnt bother.

I hear you there, except this is my 3rd R32 (gts-t w/ RB25de + t; I have a gts-t and gts4 w/ RB26 already) and as such it's a bit of a project car. I really wanted to give E85 ago and most of the local service stations stock it. I don't really want to start off with high objectives being my first project car and it is still road registered. I want something that will be reliable on the track and keep my meagre skills challenged and I don't want the costs to be crazy high.. a little of everything. It is a choice between a high flow and a hypergear at this stage, but E85 is definite. It seems the dream combo of high comp, turbo and E85 is too hard to pass up for me :D. The power figure was really ball park i'd love to have the potential to easily push higher as I get time in the car.

SS1PU is the latest version. The Model 1.5xx is the older trailing version. If you are after a responsive 250~280rwkws the SS1PU is the one to get.

That's the one I ordered in high flow form, yeah? How is my girl coming along?

You guys are confusing me a bit, I only knew of the SS1.5 (older version) and the SS1PU, the current version with billet wheel etc which is better.. But what the hell is the PU hiflow??? Is it rated the same as SS1PU?

OK, dont get confused..... Stao can highflow your turbo, its called a highflow...

Stao also does what he calls a PU highflow, which is pretty much the same as your regular highflow but stao puts a bigger rear housing on it.

The rear housing is similar to whats on the G3... But it will retain your stock front compressor housing. I believe it comfortably maxed out at 290 or so.

Ahh how nice it would be to start back at a stock skyline.. Simple highflow, cooler, zaust, tune. How nice it would be :rolleyes:

I think Ron may have gotten confused, because Birds said he was getting a SS1PU but then later he said hows my high flow going :D

I was slightly confused too

[quote name='GTScotT' timestamp='1327007343' post='6196481'

Ahh how nice it would be to start back at a stock skyline.. Simple highflow, cooler, zaust, tune. How nice it would be :rolleyes:

But then it would be boring..? :O

I hear you there, except this is my 3rd R32 (gts-t w/ RB25de + t; I have a gts-t and gts4 w/ RB26 already) and as such it's a bit of a project car. I really wanted to give E85 ago and most of the local service stations stock it. I don't really want to start off with high objectives being my first project car and it is still road registered. I want something that will be reliable on the track and keep my meagre skills challenged and I don't want the costs to be crazy high.. a little of everything. It is a choice between a high flow and a hypergear at this stage, but E85 is definite. It seems the dream combo of high comp, turbo and E85 is too hard to pass up for me :D. The power figure was really ball park i'd love to have the potential to easily push higher as I get time in the car.

Tsk tsk...you really should know better dave...looks like i gave you too much credit.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...