Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Driver fail.

Pretty much! I'm sure it has the potential to break into the 12's.

One day when im bored i might get hold of some stock rear shockies and dampers. Instead of either bogging down or lighting the tyres up every time, it might absorb some of the initial shock and grip a little better.

I need to also get some new bushes for my diff, helps with dreaded axle tramp apparently. I know for sure one of them are knackered.

Years ago my sil180 with 230rwkws got up to 13.4sec quarter driven by dr drift.

I'm no expert, Just personal experiences, need avoid that big wheel spin in 2nd going fast , ease a little throttle actually get better acceleration time. I got a D-box, its a very good toy for practice launches and quarters.

2ndly a proper manifold and ex gate setup would help heaps with up top torque, I felt that straight way after installation, will pick up more HP too. That top end torque would definitely help getting better times.

Also BB research is so far at a level that I'm pretty confident with. I have 2 more sets of bearings and can convert any G series to rollers for $200. in case of failure I will refund the $200 price difference and rebuild it back into brass bearings. Please let me know if interesting in trailing.

The wheelspin into 2nd won't really affect trap speeds though, if anything the heavier throttle/looser my runs the better the trap speed - big bogs were the main thing that seemed to cost me mph

Yep I also think a slippery launch still nets decent MPH, bogging out is more likely to cost you speed than spinning a little.

Stao does $200 also apply to my SS1PU?

Usually if you take off faster or your 60ft is lower your trap speeds will be lower

The shitter you take off bad launch high 60ft will net you higher trap speeds Aslong as you don't miss any gears and are flat foot till the end

Further updates:

Today I've trailed our SS1PU and Roller bearing SS2. Both Externally gated and E85 Results are below.

SS1PU maxed out at 322rwkws with peek boost of 20psi. This turbo is super responsive as usual.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

The Roller bearing SS2. I believe This is probably the best turbocharger that with the perfect balance of power and response for a stock Rb25det. brilliant on road driveability. It maxed at 374rwkws with 22psi of boost.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

We compared few runs against it including our new ATR-SL20.5G, 25.5G, as well as Bush V BB. Will upload bit later.

Awesome results Stao

How do these compare to the Ceramic bearing turbos?

Also let me know about that oil feed fitting from the block to turbo :) Might need it in the next 2 weeks :D

Compare to the older ball bearing setup, the difference in oil drag won't make enough differences that can be picked up by the dyno. I would call the latest more reliable, as harmonic vibration separation has taken into account. means the shaft harmonics is not affected by engine harmonics while both are spinning at high speed. I've spent many late nights and time getting that working.

89cal: The engine fitting has been sent. See how it goes, send it back for upgrade if there are any issues.

This is SS2 Ball Bearing V SS2 bush bearing. Please note today's dyno run used an proper externally gated setup while the older run had an external gate plumb back setup. There shouldn't be any differences in top end assume both runs are based on the same setup. On the same time, evidence in differences between plumb back and atmospheric ventilation.

vsbushpower.jpg

vsbushboost.jpg

GTScott: Sorry won't be able to BB SS1PU, make no differences either way.

Reading below contains the ATRSL220.5G, SS1PU, STDSL220G, and SS2BB.

powervsall.jpg

boostvsall.jpg

What were the rear housing size differences and what fuel?

The ATRSL20.5/25.5/STDSL220G are all based in a 10CM turbine

SS1PU is in a .86 turbine

SS2BB is in a .82 turbine.

All on externally gated setup with E85 Fuel.

I just got my Hi Flow turbo finally delivered, how much shaft play should there be?

I'm used to buy new turbo's, so used to almost zero, I'mm getting pretty much 1mm of side movement, not even the old RB20 turbo I have sitting here has that much, nor the VG30 BB one here either.

Maybe once it's had some oil through it and run up it will change, but it sounds awfully noisy moving the wheel around!

*edit

Ran some Moreys oil stabiliser through the oil feed and sealed it up to stand for a bit, seems to flow a lot better with less movement, forgot a bush bearing uses oil to basically centralise it and float on.

Cary on !

Edited by Brett_J

Yes when they are assembled brand new the bearings are dry. Once oil goes in it will be fine.

This is some modifications done to a G3 compressor housings that is made to accelerate the discharge velocity. Will do some trail on that soon as long with roller bearing assembly.

comp.JPG

Photo of SS2 High flowed into M35'S VQ25 turbocharger with 38mm internal wastegate.

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

comp.JPG

^^^^^

Updates on the G3 profile. I've done a trail run with the G3 today using compressor assembly above with roller bearing cartridge I have to say it is amazing. the response is at least 300RPMs more advanced with heaps better throttle response. Any one with a current G3 in Melbourne is more then welcome for a test drive.

Will be hitting the dyno next week for an comparative run against original G3. Once done I will be happy to swap it with a current G3 customer at no cost.

Will be hitting the dyno next week for an comparative run against original G3. Once done I will be happy to swap it with a current G3 customer at no cost.

:action-smiley-069: does G2.5 count? more then happy to swing by for hyper wagon fun this weekend. You be working?

For the G2.5/PU high flow I can only mod it into roller bearings but this comp profile is only suitable for G3.

The new G3 has a different comp housing profile. made to accelerate the discharging velocity, I can definitely feel the differences on road. The effects of it on top end power band is unsure so will hit Trents for one more dyno run.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...