Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure they are all based onE85 runs are on External gate with high mount manifold.

Recent results are, yes.

But the G3 is an 'old' design. Original results (the ones I used when I bought my turbo) were on the stock manifold, internal gate, and 98 pump fuel. Just wanting to see if I can compare my turbo to these results without estimating, I don't think I can.

Highmount/external by looks, i want to see internal gate 56T vs 58T on stock manifold, thats what most people have/buy..

Also going back to the 56t, originally you where saying the 58t needed cams for more power from memory,

but going back to 56T and still giving samish results, have you actually run out of turbine flow?

cheers

darren

Doubtful... Its close to a 90 trim 60mm wheel.

Just want to give Stao some props on his turbos. I recently installed an ATR28G2 SS1PU to my sr20. Car has 180k and is unopened with all the usual bolt on's. I was running 18 psi and getting 226rwkw, no cams and it felt pretty good. I just whacked on a bellmouth dump and upped pressure to 20 psi and the car pulled 236rwkw.

What really blew me away was the change in mid-range from about 4500rpm, it feels like a different turbo, noticeably more torque. I winder what it will do with cams, New HG, head studs and 24 psi?? All I can say is great product, great performance and great price,keep up the great work Stao..

great to see another good SR SS1PU result!

who tuned it Morgan?

Tom at PZP. That guys awesome, knows his stuff and always has the time to answer questions.

I cant recommend him enough.

Highmount/external by looks, i want to see internal gate 56T vs 58T on stock manifold, thats what most people have/buy..

Also going back to the 56t, originally you where saying the 58t needed cams for more power from memory,

but going back to 56T and still giving samish results, have you actually run out of turbine flow?

cheers

darren

The turbine can flow plentiful, it is a larger trimmed turbine originally engineered to use with small housinged high flows.

With the stock exhaust manifold, I can't get any thing pass 322rwkws on e85 (-40kws=98 power), and that is a SS2 turbo making 375rwkws on a proper high mount externally gated. So there isn't much more I can do apart from modifying the actual manifold or build turbos that shifts boost curve band n forward.

To compare result with pump 98 internally gated simply:

Power:

High mount E85 result - 40Kws from E85 - 15Kws External gate

So the new G3 would make:

376 - 40 - 15 = 321rwkws On pump 98 internally gated with a free flow exhaust manifold and exhaust setup.

Using factory manifold it will cap maximum power output to the 280rwkws mark. But

Factory log manifold produces better response, in comparison by 150rpms. So G3 can do 280rwkws @ 20psi by 3750RPMs.

Latest G3 results look unreal... :woot: are ther still plans for a 73mm comped td06 l2.

Nice work Stao

Probably a 76mm wheel with complete G3 housing assembly. If I can get the SL2 to produce 376rwkws without revving passing 7000rpms with 20psi by 3500rpms would be pretty sweet.

Just want to give Stao some props on his turbos. I recently installed an ATR28G2 SS1PU to my sr20. Car has 180k and is unopened with all the usual bolt on's. I was running 18 psi and getting 226rwkw, no cams and it felt pretty good. I just whacked on a bellmouth dump and upped pressure to 20 psi and the car pulled 236rwkw.

Thanks for the feedbacks. Will be looking forward to see you results with some cams.

Probably a 76mm wheel with complete G3 housing assembly. If I can get the SL2 to produce 376rwkws without revving passing 7000rpms with 20psi by 3500rpms would be pretty sweet.

That sounds good.cant wait

Didn't that fab dude that does all the lobster pipes, go a a easy 350rwkw on 20psi on standard mani on a G3 on E85

ages ago?, now he has a ss2 , and he wasn't the only one?

Out of interest any thoughts why do you think the 56t performs so well compared to 58T if your not out of turbine flow and theres no restrictions else where?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Yes that is Abe. He's spent lots of time die-grinding all the ports of the stock manifold. Can't get his result with a stock manifold.

58T in theory should be making more because it has larger inducing area. How ever the car was out dated for a service using 8000km old engine oil. Recent runs were done straight after a service. Have to admit my car drove heaps better with fresh oil too. That part is arguable.

My main concern is better transition and throttle response, and the current version satisfy that criteria.

I'm going to try out the atr28g2 soon on my sr20det soon once I get a fnt housing off stao big boost 22 to 24 psi e85 Poncams

Just want to have one more run to see the best time I can get with the kando and Ill do the turbo swap over

Hopefully it will make similar power than I am now on less boost and better response cause the fnt and bigger compressor than the tdo5h18g

I'll get Unigroup to print me a back to back comparison and post it up once done and I'll be testing it put at wsid aswell

Edited by hy_rpm

Yes that is Abe. He's spent lots of time die-grinding all the ports of the stock manifold. Can't get his result with a stock manifold.

58T in theory should be making more because it has larger inducing area. How ever the car was out dated for a service using 8000km old engine oil. Recent runs were done straight after a service. Have to admit my car drove heaps better with fresh oil too. That part is arguable.

My main concern is better transition and throttle response, and the current version satisfy that criteria.

Yeh i 100% agree you've done the right thing, just had me a bit puzzled on the outcome really

cheers

darren

Ok. as already been posted in the 400rwkws group, I've also trailed the ball bearing ATR45, or also called the ATR43 G4 profile for the Rb bolton series. This turbocharger is not responsive but ended up making 431rwkws @ 26psi. Pretty scary, foot down in 3rd and 4th, feels like the incoming air resistance is about to tear the whole car apart. It jumps from 120km/h to some where around 210km/h (stock cluster) in a blink of an eye. The RSR tyres held pretty wheel with a little wheel spin in 3rd and held all the way through 4th. mid top torque is crazy. I think this turbo can pull some series quarter mile times.

Dyno sheet:

atr45power.jpg

atr45boost.jpg

Tuning video:

I've pretty much decided to go with a Hypergear highflow service for my car, but wanted a bit of final confirmation/recommendation before I proceed...

The car:
'99 C34s2 RS4-S Stagea

Mods:
Greddy Front Mount Intercooler
3" Full stainless steel Fujitsubo exhaust and stainless steel front pipe with 3" Venom 200cpi hi-flow cat
Nistune ECU
Turbosmart Boost Tee
Nismo High-Flow Volume Fuel Pump
HKS Panel Filter

Possible future mods: Z32 AFM and larger injectors

My thoughts are to go for the PU Highflow service, to give me some headroom for future mods. Is there a better option?

I'm looking for good response and useable power. The car is my daily driver, not a track car.

See below the graph from my most recent tune...

Also - I'm on the look out for an OP6 to send in for this, so that I can keep driving my car.

Jaustechdyno22012013_zps1e67fb92.jpg

Edited by Marshstag

I think the SS1PU is abit small for the Stagea as the engine is tolling a much heavier car. I think the billet SS2 or the roller bearing G3 would be a perfect turbocharger for this vehicle if it has to be a brand new turbocharger. Alternatively highflowing standard OP6 turbocharger is also a good option.

I'm in a similar boat (geddit, boat? :D ) and will go the SS2 or, more likely, G3. It's not a daily so I'm not concerned about lag which is why I'm leaning towards the G3.

I just need to sort out my injector choice before buying the turbo. My kingdom for a simple 1000cc injector solution for a Neo!

I just need to sort out my injector choice before buying the turbo. My kingdom for a simple 1000cc injector solution for a Neo!

What's so hard to work out? The Neo is already 14mm topfeed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...