Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats a crazy result.. I like the way the torque stacks and fades off. I'd probably want that exact result for myself if I had an R33.

Is the CHRA in that SS2 core any different to the normal SS2?

22psi on e85 and shinnnnnnnnnning Dou dou dou dou

I will upload all the papers when I get a computer tonight. Doing it with my phone and it sucks.

Here is the dyno reading:

kaipower.jpg

Boost:

kaiboost.jpg

Super responsive. Makes That about the same response as the SS1PU. Makes 17psi by 3500RPMs and about 100kws by 3000.

I will upload the videos shortly.

Video footage from today.

Surprisingly after multiple runs, the turbine housing or manifold did not turn red or overly heated. I guess this is the highest no. that a highflowed r33 turbocharger in factory housings has ever archived. This evaluation is pretty successful.

It how ever do cost $200 more then factory high flow option, for the extra work required on modifying standard turbine housing, as well as the high pressure actuator and SS2 billet compressor wheel.

I believe it is good for some where around the 280rwkws when used on stock manifold, internally gated on pump 98 fuel with good supporting mods and tune.

Yes the ATR43SS1 result of it on a Rb20det is on our site. SS1 billet version is updated version with better response. How ever I don't have a result of it based on a Rb25det.

Op6 should net around 370rwkws mark in this combination. I think I can get it close to 400rwkws with a different set of compressor profile. How ever it will be much laggier.

By the way, the SS2.5 is a CHRA made only for RB high flows, specially the 21U R33 housings. Won't be great used in normal housings.

I can also build the SS2.5 using the latest G3 comp wheel. Which will not add any costs to the standard profile while producing identical amount of power.

Standard high flow can get you a very responsive 250rwkws, while the SS2.5 or G3.5 can make more power will be laggy in the op6 rear housing.

I can do a special deal on the evaluation price of the G3.5. PM for further details.

Stao, that highflow is redonkulous.

What would that in an OP6 housing cost?

Every time I settle on a plan you go and do something that throws a spanner in the works....

I will do a special deal at $1160 including oil line. it might not be as responsive in the OP6 rear, how ever that should be reaching close to 370rwkws mark once setup on a proper manifold and gate.

Also releasing one more profile for the 21U turbine housing is the G3.5 This turbocharger is also a specific high flow built chra. it should produce bit more then the SS2.5. Hopefully be seeing towards 350rwkws mark. Its been pretty responsive using the 21U turbine housing.

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

Few other news is that I've managed to source some R33 copy turbine housings. That will help saving lot of costs building them here. I will pass on the savings and work out a cheaper alternative to high flows very soon.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, i’m making Vag coil loom for rb25det, can anyone confirm the wire guage i’m using for power supply in diagram is enough for supply not too small for loom? For earth do i need to follow the same procedure or i can use only 16awg wire for all coil and their connecting wire following to the plug?
    • Did you panel beat the dents or have you tried to repair this only using filler?  Is your sanding block soft/flexible and is following the shape of the panel rather then just knocking down the high points? 
    • I haven't knocked them down yet. I think I made the repair more complex than it should have been. I had rock chips combined with waviness and dents and I tackled it all in one because it was near each other and just end up wasting a bunch of bog lol. I'll knock down those areas and see how I go. And yep what you are saying at the end is correct. I think I might be sanding the top of a steep hill then my sanding block falls into the dent and gets rid of the guidecoat if that makes sense. Though shouldnt unless I'm covering too big of an area with not a long enough block. I'll try something new and provide some updates. Getting there though! Thanks as always.  
    • Yeah makes sense, hard to comment on your situation without seeing what your doing. I was talking generally before, I would not be looking to randomly create low spots with a hammer to then have to fill them.  It's hard without seeing what your doing, it sounds like you are using the guide coat to identify low spots, as you're saying the panel is still wavy. I don't see how you're not ending up with patches of guide coat remaining in a wavy panel? Once the high spots are knocked down to the correct level, surely to have a wavy panel you need low spots. And those low spots would have guide coat still in them?
    • So I'll put filler past the repair area a bit to make sure I don't miss anything. Then I'll block it until it's almost level, put the guidecoat, then keep blocking until it's gone. Then it's still wavy.  In regards to hitting the panel, I saw this video might give more context - Skip to 0:47 he knocks it down. But yeah I'm sanding until the guidecoat is gone then checking because otherwise my filler is still well above the bodyline. Unless what you're saying is I should put guidecoat around it early, surrounding the filler then stip once it's gone?
×
×
  • Create New...