Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ATR43 SS-2 Rb25det Stagea. Externally gated from stock exhaust manifold E85 fuel. Final result of 356rwkws @ 22psi on Dyna dynamic dyno:

boost.jpg

coolercompare.jpg


Further testing and evaluation on the SS2.5 Alpha turbocharger, now using an 600x300x68mm tube n fine front mount cooler. I've attached two photos, note the tubing size inside the aftermarket cooler and factory cooler.



Aftermarket cooler:


insidenewcooler.jpg



Stock cooler:


insidestockcooler.jpg



Using the new intercooler, boost tapering issue was resolved to some extend and the same turbocharger managed to pickup more power. Cooling ability however is not as good as standard, under comparison my intake temp rise by 10 degrees. I will be fitting an thicker 600x300x100mm cooler for further evaluations coming week.


Turbocharger wise, it is matching factory N1's responds but a lot more power. Pretty good to drive at this stage.



ATR43SS2.5 Alpha, externally gated on pump 98 fuel. Peek 330awkws:


atr43ss25alpha330rwkw.jpg




atr43ss25alphaboost.jpg



Vs stock cooler using the same turbo:


coolervs.jpg



In conclusion based on test result, the factory GTR intercooler is only good for up to 320rwkws on pump fuel, for upgrade, I would be recommending a good cooler that has a core size of 600x300x100mm.



Tuned by Trent Hewitson, Intercooler piping and related fabrication done by Havoc Fabrications.


  • Like 1

All three GTR coolers are different, the 33 is best for cooling efficiency but worst for outright flow

My 105mm ARC cooler ( the best in the business) is about 4-6deg hotter then the factory 34 cooler but will happierly flow 1000hp

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

Yeah Ive heard of 450kw before

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

It isn't stock, it's 90 mm thick.

All three GTR coolers are different, the 33 is best for cooling efficiency but worst for outright flow

Weird that they're all different. How does the 32 cooler go?

And for people whom are switching to the ID 1000 injectors. The resister pack made for OEM injectors has to be removed. Big thanks for M35scotty on solving this issue yesterday. I believe he has some technical details to share.

Weird that they're all different. How does the 32 cooler go?

The 32 is the best for flow but worst for efficiency, it is extrude honed and doesn't have the little fine fins inside the runners

You can tell the difference between 32 and 33 by the front of the runners, the 33 has a grove that runs along the runner which the 32 doesn't

And for people whom are switching to the ID 1000 injectors. The resister pack made for OEM injectors has to be removed. Big thanks for M35scotty on solving this issue yesterday. I believe he has some technical details to share.

That is something very simple and well known, simple cut the resistor off and solder the seven wires together then a bit of heat shrink and electrical tape and bingo high imp injectors working

  • Like 1

One of his injectors had stopped working, after testing it I realised he hadn't cut the resistor pack off, one resistor had blown taking the power from that injector.

The resistor pack was much hotter than usual. Obviously it runs fine on the Haltech without modification, but overloads the resistors. Goes to show the Haltech runs some great output drivers.

Um, aren't the injectors on a GTR a negative trigger, so all the ecu has to do is earth them

That's the reason you remove the resistor, cause it's no longer needed and the high imp injectors will fry it

The 32 is the best for flow but worst for efficiency, it is extrude honed and doesn't have the little fine fins inside the runners

You can tell the difference between 32 and 33 by the front of the runners, the 33 has a grove that runs along the runner which the 32 doesn't

Sweet it should be better for e85 to a certain extent then as it doesn't need the efficiency that it would for 98

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...