Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This turbo is current produced.

I've trailed the ATR45 SAT on a RB25det Neo today. With 0.1L of a difference in capacity those two engines are very different. The Rb26 SAT version didn't work on Rb25det, which I've had to make a new rear for. the result was 421rwkws out of a 120,000KM stock motor. Will upload result tomorrow.

This turbo is current produced.

I've trailed the ATR45 SAT on a RB25det Neo today. With 0.1L of a difference in capacity those two engines are very different. The Rb26 SAT version didn't work on Rb25det, which I've had to make a new rear for. the result was 421rwkws out of a 120,000KM stock motor. Will upload result tomorrow.

How didn't it work? Interested in your findings

Based on the same configuration It was super responsive but didn't make expected power. Same CHRA with a SS2 turbine and it worked. Response wise It made 20psi by 4200RPM and 25psi at 4400RPM. Because the owner was looking to rebuild this engine so he didn't care if it blows and decided to max out that turbo. The final run was 421rwkws peek 28psi, He been thrashing the car on daily base, its a 120,000K unopened motor and I'm surprised of how well built stock Rb25det Neos are. Perhaps that is why Nissan never released GT-Four with a Rb25det Neo motor in it.

Its not the most responsive result I've had but good enough for a daily and not too bad for the power level its reached.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

It was making 20psi around 3800RPM, which is close to 500RPM more responsive then the GTR. but stopped making power at 370rwkws. I don't have that sheet but I can see if I can get one from the tuner.

  • Like 1

Hey guys and gals, just a few questions.

This is a quick run down on what I already have

740cc nismo injectors

Z32 afm

Walbro fuel pump

3 inch exhaust

Apexi power fc

Npc clutch

Manley rods

Pod filter

High flowed rb25 turbo

All making 215kwatw

My question is, I'm buying a hyper gear turbo very soon and I just wanted to know how much power roughly would the hyper gear turbo achieve? I can only run on 98 as we don't have it on pump in my area!

Thanks in advance for your reply

Yes, I'm mainly looking into making power and response based on unopended engines.

For internally gated options.

A high flowed R33 turbocharger that is done by us, you will be looking roughly into the 260rwkws mark. Or 270rwkws for a R34 turbocharger.

G3 and SS2 would be making around the 280rwkws mark with supporting mods.

Hey guys and gals, just a few questions.

This is a quick run down on what I already have

740cc nismo injectors

Z32 afm

Walbro fuel pump

3 inch exhaust

Apexi power fc

Npc clutch

Manley rods

Pod filter

High flowed rb25 turbo

All making 215kwatw

My question is, I'm buying a hyper gear turbo very soon and I just wanted to know how much power roughly would the hyper gear turbo achieve? I can only run on 98 as we don't have it on pump in my area!

Thanks in advance for your reply

Hi Ryanh2512,

You have pretty much the same mods as me, I just got my Hypergear Highflow from Stao installed and tuned yesterday. My car made 250rkwk on 18psi with the R33 21U Highflow very responsive and nice on the street. You may want to look into getting a 3inch metal intake pipe made up as well.

Also thanks Stao for the turbo :)

Yeah definitely look into a metal 3" intake pipe.. mine was sucking closed after just 220kw so its a no brainer if your wanting more then that. i would recommend 21u if you want good response. But if you want a kick in the face at 3.8-4k rpm definitely go ss2 without a doubt

  • Like 3

Stao - was that last Dyno graph you posted supposed to be blank?

Also, how do your latest ATR45 results compare to the Neo Stagea result a couple of pages back? Are they similar, but different dynos? It was over 400kw..

Sorry - last question! Can you provide an Adaptronic e1280s along with your turbos, rather than the Select model? They have full sequential ign and injection, more flexible, and still have the rb25 style ecu plug.

The following is about the boost drop with few customers cars. The ability of an internally gated system holding boost through the rev range is crucial in building HP and torque in mid and upper rev range. Making sure our turbochargers are able to hold boost, our internally gated systems has been engineered to performing a very slight creep. Most of guys that uses high flows or a simple boltons tried to obtain legal appearance while keeping the amount of fabrication work to minimum, that in most of cases have to deal with restrictions. I've been building turbos for RB owners for a number of years and there is a pretty clear pattern emerging, The most people whom experience boost dropping issues are fitted with some sort of a return flow cooler. I was curious and undecided wither if it is an intercooler issue, there for purchased a car with a genuine Blitz return flow cooler fitted.

Today's run, I'm using a high flowed OP6 turbocharger with a high pressure actuator. Maps sensors were tapped from both sides of the intercooler and results was some how expected. Running high pressure actautor with no boost ebc connected, sensors is reading a 3.7psi drop across the core, and which I'm sure if EBC is adapted, the percentage of drop will be much greater.

boost.jpg

Didn't make expected power:

power.jpg

So Return flow coolers should not be used when expecting beyond 250rwkws. And in my personal opinion it should not be used at all. 600x300x100mm cooler will be installed next week to complete power run above.

  • Like 1

Stao, do you think it's only the core that's the problem or does the return flow piping also play a part in the pressure drop? Do you think replacing the core in a return flow system would alleviate the problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...