Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Just got word, my retune @20 pound got 417hp atw with the SS2 on e85

Up from 370hp atw with previous 16 pound tune

(Hub dyno)

Will get the graph up later today.

Edited by jay-rod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so the 28SS-2 turbine with the 64mm comp wheel sounds about 99% exactly what i'm after, just wonder what if any effect the 11 blade turbine does to flow and inertia V the 9 blade with slotting two extra blades in the same space

I just sold the -7s so would this be something you can supply as a complete unit in -5 housings or would i need to source the housings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late to the party,but re the return flow cooler turbos vs non return.

When people say it hasnt affected them.

Is it just because the hypergear stuff is being dynoed and dynoed on specific motors and is targeted for a specific purpose that the resulting pressure drop shifted the compressor out of the sweet spot of the map.

Hes then reworked it to shift it back taking into account that.

Whereas a aftermarket turbo built not for a specific purpose has a different map

And by chance /luck or design is less affected about being put on a different spot on its compressor map

Cheers

Darren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Case in point being the gtx wheels work at highpressure ratios

Maybe a gtx3076 can take the hit of being shifted across the map and the only

Result is a higher intake air temp but not enough to skew the numbers to

Much

Cheers

Darren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late to the party,but re the return flow cooler turbos vs non return.

When people say it hasnt affected them.

Is it just because the hypergear stuff is being dynoed and dynoed on specific motors and is targeted for a specific purpose that the resulting pressure drop shifted the compressor out of the sweet spot of the map.

Hes then reworked it to shift it back taking into account that.

Whereas a aftermarket turbo built not for a specific purpose has a different map

And by chance /luck or design is less affected about being put on a different spot on its compressor map

Cheers

Darren

I think the high kilometer Neo engine with more chamber squish and plenty of built up carbon deposits is causing the det, it probably has little to do with the cooler which is likely working as hard as it can.

The whole 'lets guess a compressor design and trial it' has to have the odd failure rate too. You are probably correct that the original turbo is out of efficiency for this particular setup.

Other than that, the new turbo making 300wkw on 98 isn't a bad thing, most would be happy with that result, even using a more expensive GT3076. If it were me I would have left the Blitz return flow seeing most of his customers will be wanting to run it anyway. There aren't many other off the shelf cooler options for the 34, not without hacking holes at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ATR43G4 SAT has been trailed on two cars, and from previous reading it is holding 27psi perfect flat before the cooler, its not a case of a compressor losing efficiency at high shaft speed that case boost tapering. Getting that volume of air into the engine is the problem.

Now, the 600x300x100mm cooler it now fitted and I have picked up 3psi pushing it from 292rwkws to 313rwkws, got better response and allow one degree of extra timing. But there is still a 5psi drop.

The cooler it self is also been used on my GTR, that shown no boost drop across the core. The problem will be either in all the bents of the pipings or if there is a leak or issue on the inlet manifold of the car.

Over 2G has been spent in to investigation, and this has never been experienced before on any of my other cars. None further turbocharger evaluations could be conducted, so I'm not stopping till its sorted. I'll weld vacuum nipples at different bents of the cooler piping and monitor drops from individual points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem will be either in all the bents of the pipings or if there is a leak or issue on the inlet manifold of the car.

Forget the piping, it's fine for much more. Surely you pressure tested the intake to check for leaks? The plenum gaskets are renowned for leaking between the halves when the engine gets hot...

What's the exhaust like? Does it run a cat? Is one of the mufflers restricted?

The stock BOV leaks badly at that boost. There is a few PSI gained from swapping to a Turbosmart Kompact which would lower the shaft speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cooler change:

P98 fuel. Blue lines are with blitz cooler, The red/gold lines are from new cooler. Nothing has been changed apart from the cooler. Its hitting 200rwkws @ 4000RPM as well. Pretty good to drive. I will do a pressure test and see what comes up.

atr45sat311rwkwnewcooler.jpg

atr45sat311rwkwnewcoolerboost.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also got a print of John reco's R33, thats the first time I had a proper look at his result. It is running our standard 21U high flow on E85 fuel, and I'm amazed of how responsive it is.

reco21uhf310rwkwe85.jpgreco21uhf310rwkwe85boost.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catching up with the return flow cooler topic. Theoretically vacuum pressure at one point of exit is identical to all points of exit. I'm leaning towards manifold or gasket leaks and etc. On the same time your big cooler worked well. 1psi = 20kws :blink: can't wait to see what it does at 24psi. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...