Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did a turbo change just making sure that I'm not going to spend money on a new cooler kit for nothing, Now with a ATR43SS-2 on board making no differences to boost drop. New intercooler is getting fitted on the 2nd of April, will update results then.

For now, 276rwkws @15psi with cooler restrictions:

atr43ss2boostdrop.png

atr43ss2276rwkw.png

Also ATR28SS-2 powered S13 SR20det with 264/12mm cams. Final result of 299rwkws @ 22psi, P98 fuel:

atr28299rwkw.jpg

atr28299rwkwboost.jpg

One more piece of Red top SR20det data. This is using 264 inlet and 272 exhaust. Running our SL20.5 Turbo in 8cm turbine. Car made 477rwhp / 356rwkws on 23psi E85 fuel. Graph running against a Apexi rx6 turbo that was previously installed. Dyna dynamics roller dyno, shoot out mode.

power.jpg

twoturbos.JPG

  • Like 1

Based on the cooler behavior from earlier test runs. I've made another special application turbo: ATR45-SRFC

This one is made for the minimum amount of boost drop, making some some where towards the 300rwkws mark on pump fuel. It is a bolton turbo just like the ATR43SS/G series. So this will be your recommended turbo if you you've got this type of intercooler installed chasing similar power levels.

Final result of 292rwkws @ 19psi after cooler. Internally gated, P98 fuel.

power.JPG

boostlabeled.jpg

Another prototype, this one is made for internally gated XR6 BA and FGs. Unlike the GTX3582, this turbocharger is also fitted with a much larger exhaust wheel working with a big 40mm internal gate. The approximated HP out put on this turbocharger is around the 430rwkws internally gated on pump 98 fuel. Releasing few evaluation units at special prices, PM if any one is interested to trail.

atr45ssfront.jpg

atr45ssrear.JPG

I know very little about the pyhsical size specs of turbos but is it possible to fit a GT30 turbine to a GT28 core, im wondering if that would be possible and crop it down to 58x52ish then stick a GTX67 comp wheel on it to make your own 5867 that will take machined -5 GTR housings for that factory fit ?

Or can the -5 housings bolt onto a GTX3067R agian with the cropped turbine ?

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

You can use your existing compressor wheel and run with our ATR28SS-2 turbine wheels in your current turbine housings. That will drop back pressure, cooler EGT, and makes more torque.

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

Yep sounds like you need 1 good turbo instead Micky! :P

Based on the cooler behavior from earlier test runs. I've made another special application turbo: ATR45-SRFC

This one is made for the minimum amount of boost drop, making some some where towards the 300rwkws mark on pump fuel. It is a bolton turbo just like the ATR43SS/G series. So this will be your recommended turbo if you you've got this type of intercooler installed chasing similar power levels.

Final result of 292rwkws @ 19psi after cooler. Internally gated, P98 fuel.

When making pressure measurements you have to take the air temperature into consideration.

The air before the FMIC is much warmer and hence less dense which attributes to higher volume / pressure.

After the FMIC it's the inverse of the of what I just wrote.

When making pressure measurements you have to take the air temperature into consideration.

The air before the FMIC is much warmer and hence less dense which attributes to higher volume / pressure.

After the FMIC it's the inverse of the of what I just wrote.

I tried explaining that, unfortunately the cooler was blamed for the IAT too which is pretty funny. :P

I think he realised it was the compressor that was causing the heat, hence the new turbo that was trialled.

You can use your existing compressor wheel and run with our ATR28SS-2 turbine wheels in your current turbine housings. That will drop back pressure, cooler EGT, and makes more torque.

Any possiblity of specs for that wheel and i would like to go smaller on comp wheel to help with response, the 71mm i think is a bit big for what my goal is, do you have anything around the 65mm mark that will cover 500kw in twin form

Also i have a pair of -7s here im not using, i believe the exhaust housing is the same as the RSs just need to get .60 comp covers

Any possiblity of specs for that wheel and i would like to go smaller on comp wheel to help with response, the 71mm i think is a bit big for what my goal is, do you have anything around the 65mm mark that will cover 500kw in twin form

Also i have a pair of -7s here im not using, i believe the exhaust housing is the same as the RSs just need to get .60 comp covers

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

According to this the AR's are different between -7 and RS's.

I have 64mm comp billet wheels, Those are from ATR28SS15. It peeked 281rwkws, and averaging about 275rwkws pump 98 fuel, on my SR. On dyno it is slightly more responsive then a 2871 while made more power.

Orange is ATR28SS15 in .64 rear, Green is GT2871 in .64 rear. Both are S14s with BC Step 2 cams. on pump 98 fuel.

vsgt2871power.JPG

Slight boost control issue on that particular day:

vsgt2871boost.JPG

With boost controller fixed:

power.jpgboost.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...