Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 07/05/2021 at 10:50 AM, hypergear said:

Yep it was more responsive then the stock twins, and held boost all the way to red line.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

T4 twin scroll or single? What AR and when we can buy it 💓

Its currently a single scroll T4. I'm making a new prototype for 400awkws with same response. Will be available for public in T3 or T4 rear housings once tested in about two weeks time.

 

  • 2 weeks later...

carondynofront.jpg

Tested more more Protoype Rb26 T4 Turbo today.  Car made 443awkws E85 at 27psi, reaching 20psi and 200awkws by 4000RPM. Will be looking at Cam shaft upgrade and slight turbine trimming for the next run.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 1

ATR45SS-1 Ball beairng Turbocharger in T3 Vband rear externally gated. In an R33 GTST, built Rb25det engine, factory stroke, with 264 camshaft maintain VCT. Final result was 472rwkws externally gated, power pulling all the way to 8000RPM on E60 fuel with 230rwkws @ 4000RPM. It would easily make 500rwkws+ with upgraded cooler and fuel system.

enginebay.jpg

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
On 05/06/2021 at 9:35 PM, hypergear said:

Following the car above, now with E85, Pull 511rwkws and still plumbed back gate.

511rwkwE85.jpg

500rwkwE850boost.jpg 

RB26 owner's wet dream. On song before 4500rpm and make those kind of numbers.

  • Like 2
On 08/06/2021 at 1:28 PM, SKYMAGGOT said:

What size is the exhaust?

3.5 inches to 3. there should be another 20 kws left in it once externally gated with a better cooler. 

Result for you. ATR43ss2 ballbearing version compared to Garrett GTX 3076 gen 2. Same 0.82 externally gated housing used on both, and the turbo was the only change to the setup. Forged RB25, Supertech valvesprings, 256 Poncams, topmount steampipe ex.manifold with Turbosmart 38mm external gate, 3.5in intake pipe, 3.5in turbo back exhaust, Apexi PFC. P98 fuel.

20210411_101516.thumb.jpg.4cfa7bc4dd485566822684174578339c.jpg

dyno.thumb.jpg.9aef615cb4115a35ec216deff3e66961.jpg

Disregard the pink line; that was the GTX running an EBC that overboosted, run aborted. The blue line is the ATR43, no boost controller, just running wastegate pressure. The red and green lines are the GTX, also just running wastegate pressure....crappy ex.manifold resulted in spiking a much higher boost pressure, another story so disregard that aspect of the higher HP when it hits 24psi.

Important part to note is the ATR making more HP through the entire run right up until the boost creep on the GTX. Also to note, the R35 afm in a 3.5in pipe was hitting 5v at the peak of the red run.

Here's the run of just the ATR.

1283232125_dyno1.thumb.jpg.d45af8a82c177bbeeaeb8200697469e2.jpg

Just under 400rwhp. Note this was also with an inadequate boost controller; now running a Greddy MAP controller allowing for boost to come on stronger earlier without overshooting at higher rpms, so the midrange is now stronger.

Same dyno and tuner for both, just done at different sessions.

Edited by hardsteppa
  • Like 2

Similar to an ATR43SS-2

Another ATR45SS-2 result to share, This time in a T3 1.0 Rear with a Built RB26 running stock cams. Car made a impressive 625rwkws @ 38psi E85 fuel.

enginebay.jpg

 

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

  • 2 weeks later...

 


New prototype ATR45SS turbocharger. Now sitting at 485Awkws @ 32psi of boost, all in by 4200RPM. New turbo made 40kws more in power while no lose in response. Car's nice and and responsive to drive. Currently sitting at the limitation of the stock engine, considering of doing a forged build soon.

Stock R34 GTR Rb26 with APR head studs
HKS Cam gears 0 inlet, 0 exhaust.
R35 GTR coil packs
Trigger kit
ID 1650cc injectors
Twin 540 Walbro pumps+11m fuel line
Apexi FMIC
Trust 3 inches turbo back exhaust
PS2000
Nismo Front mount cooler
T4 high mount exhaust manifold
HyperGear 50mm External gate
HyperGear ATR45SS Prototype T4 Vband rear
3 inches front pipe with cutout
Final result so far 485awkw / 650awhp @ 32psi E85 fuel. All in by 4200RPM. 
 

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Great work Tao, looks like Trent ramp in the boost gently to limit torque so the stock motor wouldn't explode. Judging by the graphs you could get more boost in earlier but most likely break the motor LOL

That comp cover also looks great, much nicer than premium products with poor casting and material missing.

  • Like 1
On 06/05/2021 at 9:01 AM, hypergear said:

Further development on the T4 printed turbo on Rb26. This prototype made a pretty big differences, peek 377awkws while making 20psi by 3500RPM and 220rwkws @ 4000RPM. Will doing few more things and hopefully seeing 420awkws+ without loosing response. 

carondyno2.jpg

 

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

Is that turbo already available to buy?

  • 3 weeks later...

Some footage from last Winton practice from Mr Oversteering, Still running one of our high flowed OP6 Turbocharger making a responsive 310rwkws.

 

  • Like 1
  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...