Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

With high EBC loading, the boost pressure before cooler rises, but what inside inlet manifold doesn't change. Here's some thing fun to watch. Our TD06SL205 turbocharger on a CA18det pulling 307rwkws E85 fuel. Run 11 sec quarter:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gday guys, I just wanted to post up quickly my results from a hypergear op6 hiflow on my R34. It was tuned by Trent at mercury and made 265rwkw @19psi on pump 98. Very pleased with the result, the power delivery is nice and smooth but still kicks you in the ass once it gets going ;)

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

updating some 1JZ results. Those are from 1JZGTE Chasers:

This is 292rwkws on 19psi on our TD06SL205 Turbocharger externally gated, P98 fuel, Unopened engine:

sl2051jz292rwkwp98.jpg

And this is using a high flowed factory CT15B on E85 fuel making 321rwkws.

ct15bhf321rwkwe85.jpg

Can you machine the TD06L2 (61mm) exhaust housing to take the larger TD06 turbine (65mm)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been a few weeks getting the new test car ready and I've spent quite some time diagnosing a boost ceiling issue.

For today's test, I've tapped two extra boost sources on both sides of the intercooler piping, and monitored pressure drops on all four points.

nipples.jpg

Surprisingly it is a issue with the actual intercooler it self. Three intercoolers was tested, they were the Takashi (a good Chinese made cooler) in 600x300x68mm, 600x300x100mm, and a Generic ebay cooler in 600x300x76mm. Final result reviews the 600x300x100mm Takashi cooler had the best response, while the Generic ebay cooler made the most power.

boostall.jpg

powerall.jpg

I will likely be trailing a PWR item of a similar size, hopefully an expansive branded item could solves this issue.

Final result was peek of 281rwkws @ 19psi after cooler pressure on Pump 98 fuel.
ATR43SS-2 Internally gated
ID 1000cc injectors
Walbro fuel pump
Adaptronic Plug in ECU
3inches turbo back exhaust
Tune at Chequrered Tuning.

The last sheet shown the same turbocharger working with same type of engine but return flow cooler kited. Notice lag created of having extra piping length.

vsreturnflow.jpg

For best result on a Rb25det R34, Get a proper FMIC kit with a big free flow intercooler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that graph above shows a difference of around 750rpm extra "lag" with return flow pipework?

Is this a pretty typical result?

I run custom return flow style pipework, with 2.5 inch pipes and a pretty tight radius off one end of the cooler. Have been wondering for a while if any gains were to be had from going a traditional front mount style pipes.

My setup is laggy, but I think thats more to do with the turbo choice, and RB20 haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be interesting to see how a top mount setup might go seeing as you could really reduce the length of the piping. Don't know how you would go about fitting one for practical use but would be good to see what it could do on a dyno for some giggle factor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, it's a daily so not necessary. The water radiator is quite large though, almost the size of the radiator and is sandwiched between the air con condenser core and the radiator for stealth. I haven't got around to logging temps properly yet (there are temperature senders in the top and bottom of the radiator and I will be placing them in the intercooler outlet too) but using an infrared temperature gun shows the IC outlet temps stay close to ambient on the dyno.

Throttle response is instant in every sense of the word as expected from a stock 21U turbo on a 30DET with an automatic gearbox. It'll be getting one of your highflows hopefully later in the year once a few other mods get done, most likely OP6 based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, I will be looking forward to your job.

In this car I'm mainly looking into some common mods that majority of people use, and this definitely shares to some of the problems that few people experienced, especially in the cheap and stealth category. I will be looking into possible ways of targeting those problems through a turbocharger.

Here is some thing fun to watch. :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...