Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Nice video footage. :)

This is a set of rather unusual high flow jobs. Pair of high flowed 2860-5s into ATR28SS15. Its going to a Rb30det engine with Rb26 head. Hopefully they will solve the back pressure issues currently experiencing with GTRS turbine wheel. One more thing that I'm alittle concern is the back pressure in the exhaust system as the ATR28SS15 is ideally made to run on a single 3 inches turbo back system, that GTR is pretty good of having 4 inches turbo back exhaust, still have to be shared with two turbo how ever. I've made some oversized thrust collars for that purpose, hopefully be seeing close to 500rwkws with those once fully running.

frontnback.JPG

One more prototype of SAT prototype is made for my single high mount GTR. This one was engineered to make around 450awkws on the current setup without additional lag. It made huge amount of torque, and clutch is gone. This one will definitely be making alot more power, and response is no different to the traditional SAT. Nismo Super coppermix is going in, hopefully be back on the dyno in two weeks time.

carondyno.JPG

atr45satssoncar.jpg

Vs standard ATR45SAT (pink and yellow is from the new prototype, stopped when clutch gave away)

power.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice video footage. :)

This is a set of rather unusual high flow jobs. Pair of high flowed 2860-5s into ATR28SS15. Its going to a Rb30det engine with Rb26 head. Hopefully they will solve the back pressure issues currently experiencing with GTRS turbine wheel. One more thing that I'm alittle concern is the back pressure in the exhaust system as the ATR28SS15 is ideally made to run on a single 3 inches turbo back system, that GTR is pretty good of having 4 inches turbo back exhaust, still have to be shared with two turbo how ever. I've made some oversized thrust collars for that purpose, hopefully be seeing close to 500rwkws with those once fully running.

frontnback.JPG

I noticed you have removed the divider between the turbine outlet and the wastegate, just curious of the thinking behind that ?

The exhaust is twin 3" through twin 3" cats into single 4" at the mid muffler then 4" out the rest, back pressure from exhaust shouldn't be an issue :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rear wheels are bigger, once machined the divider turned out to be very thin. Since the compressors are lot bigger also, it will create greater turbine flow. Usually internal waste gates don't at full 90 degrees, the divider would limits the amount of bleeding area around the disc resulting unlimited boost creep, that is some thing else I had in concerns, but I won't know till they are in the car and running.

My recent RAC speed event.

SS2 ~410hp

Despite my over steer incident, my best time of the day.

Great footage :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rear wheels are bigger, once machined the divider turned out to be very thin. Since the compressors are lot bigger also, it will create greater turbine flow. Usually internal waste gates don't at full 90 degrees, the divider would limits the amount of bleeding area around the disc resulting unlimited boost creep, that is some thing else I had in concerns, but I won't know till they are in the car and running.

I figured there would be a reason, was just curious as to what it was and figured it might have to do with get gases away from turbine, unfortunately I run split dumps and will have to put something back in there so the split dump works the way it is meant to :/

Yep, these are mine and are replacing my GT-RSs in the hope of gaining some response and allow me to run more boost to see if I can crack 500awkw, currently at 458awkw @ 28psi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool! I remember drunk conversations at Mick's place a couple of years ago playing around with ideas like this - we were discussing FP based similar solutions, but this works. Will be very interesting to see how it comes out :)

I still wonder/worry a bit about the housings and potential restrictions beyond the actual wheels themselves which could hamper progress but I hope they are unfounded. When do you aim to have this all together?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as Scott (Insight Motorsport) has his dyno up and running agian, it got flooded in the last big storm over here

Time will tell if it works or not, either way it has to be better then the GT-RSs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, I've made some custom exhaust wheels that is for the GTR OEM high flows. They are engineered to support 300 ~ 350awkws region on pump fuel and response will have similar to stock twins. My car's waiting for bits and pieces, so if any one is interested to evaluate please let me know, I will put a special offer for $1200 on both turbochargers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The twin atr28ss1.5 should have no problems cracking 500kw on your rb2630 setup

A single ss1.5 on my old sr20 made a very easy 251kw on 20psi and 266kw with a larger

.86 rear housing and 24psi

Only thing stopping you from running 25+psi maybe the back pressure from the turbines unless stao has changed them as I got mine a while ago 1-2years ago and smaller rear housing will be the best for response

I gained 16kw from going from a .64ar to .86ar but full boost went from 3750rpm to 4100rpm also 4psi more but felt faster and more responsive with the .64 ar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...