Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey everyone,

if anyone could post up who has the known !! quickest drag time on this forumn using an actual skyline chassis. not the motor in another car.

this is to prove my bro that there is cars on here that are quicker then the cars on his supra forum.

he said there are 9 sec street legal supras ( goodd dammmn hella quik lol )

so is there anyone out there that is quiker ?? is it street legal ??

plz help me out here guys. and im sure everyone would like to know

from the research iv done on the forums so far, it hink DirtGarage is the quickest.

thanks in advance guys

chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281393-who-has-the-fastest-skyline-on-sau/
Share on other sites

No 9sec cars are street legal mate.

If you mean cars that are "registered" then i would say the Dirtman is up there, but im not even sure that is registered anymore?

There are alot of high 10sec cars here on the forum.

But seriously i do not see the point of this thread.

Tell your brother RBs rule and thats that.

(2Js are awesome though)

I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

Mines still a street car...good for the occasional sunday cruise.

Edited by DiRTgarage
I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

in the 8's ??? wow thats awesome.. didnt think they would be in the 8's

id really like to find out the quickest one its got me very curious

thanks for that duncan

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

faster than my PB...thats what i aim for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

Edited by DiRTgarage
faster than my PB...thats what i am for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

damn.. thats awesome, must be a huge adrenlarin rush lol

thanks alot for that paul. in 5 mins i have proved my bro wrong hahaha

LOL that's an hilarious screen cap. Such a lame warning sign. Would also like to know what sensor (MAP?) was telling the computer that specifically the manifold was damaged lol. I guess it had to fit in with the warnings from earlier scenes about using NOS.

Now me and the mad scientist gotta rip apart the block and replace the piston rings you fried. OOOOOOOHHHH!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...