Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

AFM can make lots more power then this. Running a 044 pump with 70psi base pressure?

Really, trent at status tuned mine to 110% and said he wasnt happy going that far, so your telling me that with an 044, standard afm, injectors, pfc and adjustable fpr i could safely get 270rwkw??

1. You can tune past the AFM. Always have been able too.

2. Fuel reg is aftermarket, so the power can be made on stock injectors.

It's just too high compared to the rest of the world for 16psi IMO.

Not saying it's safe to do either of the above either ;)

has been done before here in perth there was an r33 pushing high 400rwhp with stock r33 gts-t injectors + aftermarket fpr

but we all know what happen to that motor lol

Edited by Kaido_RR
What the........... That is amazing. Can somebody tell me why im only doing 233kws? on 17.5 psi

- full exhaust

- fmic

- pody

- z32

- 5 puk heavy duty clutch

- walbro

- 740cc injectors

- pfc

- ebc

- hyper gear highflow on stock turbo highflow

thats insane power mate!

the gcg ones make more power than the hypergear ones but are less responsive, we regularly see 270rwkw from the gcg high flows but i definitely would not tune one stock injectors and AFM..... sketchy to say the least...

Edited by URAS

Why would the engine let go? If the tune is fine there shouldnt be a problem with it at that power level. Obviously it's not going to last forever, but it definetely isn't to let go any time soon due to 275rwkw. The injectors being old standard ones and failing is the main concern i would be having. Unless that is what you ment?

Edited by PM-R33
Why would the engine let go? If the tune is fine there shouldnt be a problem with it at that power level. Obviously it's not going to last forever, but it definetely isn't to let go any time soon due to 275rwkw. The injectors being old standard ones and failing is the main concern i would be having. Unless that is what you ment?

No, it would fail because the tuner is practically guessing after 220rwkw and anything can go wrong after that. Air temp changes, air density changes, boost spike, coolant temp increases and there's not enough safety window to cover it.

creat'd have to tune a lot of cars where people wont splash the cash on an AFM....

i was in there and they had a 360rwkw GTT on c16 with a stock afm....

the stock injectors can definately make that power with an FPR, been done many times, just not something i would want to ri$k with my car... same goes for stock afm

Doesn't seem that special..

The Neo in my Stag is making 240awkw @ 12psi on stock injectors and stock fpr (pretty damn close to maxing out though). When I get around to putting the 550cc injectors in I'll see what it makes at 16-18psi.

Hey trent, i will come down for a tune soon, So the GCG ones are more responsive or hypergear?

hypergear, but the gcg ones tend to make 10-20rwkw (34 makes more than 33) more at the same boost.

No, it would fail because the tuner is practically guessing after 220rwkw and anything can go wrong after that. Air temp changes, air density changes, boost spike, coolant temp increases and there's not enough safety window to cover it.

i wouldn't say the tuner is guessing, (that siad im not a tuner). most of the things you mentioned should still be ok with a decent tune, its more when something else fails/goes wrong, and there is boost spike, or low voltage to fuel pump etc etc that there is less of a 'safety' window, but theorietically a tuner should be able to get it pretty close for most real world driving conditions, even pushing passed that tuning scope of the AFM (within reason, obviously aiming for like 1000hp is unrealistic)

i wouldn't say the tuner is guessing, (that siad im not a tuner). most of the things you mentioned should still be ok with a decent tune, its more when something else fails/goes wrong, and there is boost spike, or low voltage to fuel pump etc etc that there is less of a 'safety' window, but theorietically a tuner should be able to get it pretty close for most real world driving conditions, even pushing passed that tuning scope of the AFM (within reason, obviously aiming for like 1000hp is unrealistic)

quickly;

what happens is the afm will hit 5.12v or whatever at say 5000rpm at 13psi, anywhere above this boost level the ecu will trace along the same line as it did @ 13psi so say at 17psi the ecu still thinks its running 13psi. To over come this you need to tune the 13psi line for 17psi therefore at 13psi you have the same timing and fuel values.... this means it is rich and retarded from say 12-16.5psi....

Are we 100% sure that it is a stock airflow metre though?

As posted it was a stock AFM, i can vouch for this as i was there

what fuel???

98 octane.

Drove the car myself and it pulls very hard & still remains responsive.

Dyno is not happy, it is a 2008 model Dyno and has been calibrated recently, seems every time someone makes big power that people find hard to believe then the dyno must be happy.

Bas made similar power with this exact turbo on Trent's dyno.

As Ash stated earlier Mat tuned past the stock AFM and bumped up fuel pressure, not the safest thing to do but injectors will be upgraded soon.

Mat is not guessing when he tunes, he tunes very well and has proved this with several other cars. We managed over 250kw on 17psi (GT3071r) with my SR, no cams and tune is fairly safe. I never get over 20 knock even at the track and my AFR's are spot on (full power, cruise, and idle), hopefully Mat will jump in soon if anyone has any other questions Mat?? :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...