Jump to content
SAU Community

The Cops Are Ramping It Up - Leave The Skyline At Home!


Recommended Posts

Ok fellas...cops have been told to up the ante so watch out!!

how so they are already pulling over everything with 4 wheels and a cannon zorst.. guna start going for the pushbikes too?

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how so they are already pulling over everything with 4 wheels and a cannon zorst.. guna start going for the pushbikes too?

Ha ha ha...mate, soon you'll get defected for having rusty roller blades! :)

Ha ha ha...mate, soon you'll get defected for having rusty roller blades! :)

Or a screw

Of which btw - we are all still waiting to see the defect notice or whatever with a screw listed on it - as you said.

Or a screw

Of which btw - we are all still waiting to see the defect notice or whatever with a screw listed on it - as you said.

HA AHA HA

The second and third fines was just a fine letter saying $292 for driving a unroadworthy vehicle. That's the problem. Nothing listed. Why do you think I lost it?

It's because I still have a valid roadworthy and just cleared it a few weeks before and then they fine me again.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

it sounds like he got the fine they like handing out not actually a defect my mate got one a couple weeks ago for too low but no defect just infringement notice.. which is stupid cos he doesnt have to show anyone that the car has been raised etc.

can someone clarify does the defect notice need 5 items for a major? someone told me this and i find it hard to believe i got 2 things listed and "inspection incomplete" which vicroads had never heard of inspection incomplete..

:banana:

it sounds like he got the fine they like handing out not actually a defect my mate got one a couple weeks ago for too low but no defect just infringement notice.. which is stupid cos he doesnt have to show anyone that the car has been raised etc.

can someone clarify does the defect notice need 5 items for a major? someone told me this and i find it hard to believe i got 2 things listed and "inspection incomplete" which vicroads had never heard of inspection incomplete..

:banana:

one big enough flaw will give you a major if the Office sees it as a safety issue, IE; tyres on belts. it is up to the officers discretion.

The second and third fines was just a fine letter saying $292 for driving a unroadworthy vehicle. That's the problem. Nothing listed. Why do you think I lost it?

It's because I still have a valid roadworthy and just cleared it a few weeks before and then they fine me again.

If that's the case, keep the RWC and the fine.. don't pay it and take the matter to court. How can you be fined for driving an unroadworthy car without being told what is unroadworthy on it?

If that's the case, keep the RWC and the fine.. don't pay it and take the matter to court. How can you be fined for driving an unroadworthy car without being told what is unroadworthy on it?

Exactly.

You cannot defect a car and say it is Unroadworthy - without actually stating what the problem is.

That is just retarded.

in the last week, i've only seen 2cop cars. whats the big deal with everyone ? your car is a magnet, leave it at home,

if its legal to the eye, no problems.

thanks for that..

maybe it would be nice to go for a drive given the good weather

i agree nismoid but that is what they are doing just handing out $292 fine as an infringement notice.

I would definitely contest all of these fines. If they don't NOU the car I don't see how it's possible to issue fine for Unroadworthy vehicle. Any decent solicitor should be able to get you off that if you ask me. Roadworthiness is a safety issue so fines irrelevant IMO as NOU is to force person to make car safe. I fyou give out fine without NOU then your defeiting the purpose. Doesn't make any sense to me and I would think court would agree.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

Ash,

Please read my posts again. I got a canary initially - yes, of course I got all the yellow sticker and the list of things to fix - yes. However, the subsequent fines did not involve a canary. You may recall that I wrote, I can't believe they can fine me again for having an unroadworthy vehicle and $292 only days after I got a full RWC and had cleared it with Vicroads.

This is why I am upset. So to recap, canaried - cleared it, then fined again after that without canary.

Exactly.

You cannot defect a car and say it is Unroadworthy - without actually stating what the problem is.

That is just retarded.

Thank you...now you feel my anger...the pointed to various things as I had mentioned before and then just said it's unroadworthy even after I showed them my RWC I got a few days before that.

thanks for that..

maybe it would be nice to go for a drive given the good weather

i agree nismoid but that is what they are doing just handing out $292 fine as an infringement notice.

+1

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...