Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not suprised, being auto...my 4294 with a .91 T6 housing wasn't any laggier than a 3540 1.06 on a RB30 single cammer really with a auto

only a split second was a 3540 better and then the 3540 got fiercely trodden on...

Edited by jet_r31

agreed that drag+auto = a totally different ball game when it comes to response. its got very little in common with response on a street or circuit car.

have had a 3076 on an old school 4 pot feel as responsive as a T25 SR with the right cam and stall combo. easy to do, just useless around a bend.

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

Must be moving on from older technology that did it...

Eagerly waiting results as this was the same path I wanted to go down! :) Built motor? Is the 6262 Gunna be pushed hard mate?

yea fully built 25/30, will be pushed hard eventually ;). Just dummy fitted the hot side tonight.

dscn0577x.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Edited by SilverECR33

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Well after Jez's result on his standard 26, it'll be hard to go past the 6262. He made 402 at just over 20 -21 psi IIRC.

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

When I was comparing my 6466 to a 6262 a few weeks ago, the angle on the blades looked a little different but also the gap between the blades on the intake were signicantly more of the 6466. Both were CEA's

Hmm thats indicating its more than just a change in trim, the 64mm comp must have a way bigger exducer than the 62mm so its more or less an entirely difference turbo.

Like comparing a 3076 and 3082 I guess. Same stuff, different application entirely.

A link to a page with comparison to old tech 65mm wheel (I think the 62mm turbine is same tech) and compared to new 66 CEA turbine:

http://realstreetperformance.com/store/precision-billet-cea-6266-turbo-750hp-turbocharger-2709.html?zenid=59df912a5cff403c6491d3cf5176bc7c

FYI both 6262 and 6266 are rated as 700HP items. I'd be chasing that 66 CEA item, better tech is where its at.

Finally got the 5558 in today, can I use any 3" v-band flange off ebay (exhaust/dump side), and what oil line/fitting did you guys use - do I just go to Pirtek/Enzed or get an ebay jobbie - re: Kando lines fit? I am not sure if you just connect the oil line to part way in the existing line or get rid of existing and new one straight to block? thanks :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...