Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, burn4005 said:

its interesting that the Precisions seem to be happy well past the flow the manufacturer rates the compressor for. whereas Borg Warner made their turbines strong enough to cope with the choke speed of the compressor they paired it with and not much more as its outside the design parameters.

They just quote some arbitrary hp number which annoys me no end, if you run a "705hp" Precision turbo on a diesel engine you are not going to make anywhere NEAR that power - though if you remove that turbo and then put it on a serious engine running "FTW Black" race fuel you could end up making 900-1000hp - yet on both engines it could have been completely at choke flow.  

Even "lb/min" really is a slightly crap rating for air flow, the whole "corrected gas flow" thing is all well and good when Borg Warner, Garrett, Holset etc all use different standards for defining what mass air flow is moved in whatever conditions.  

Just looking for a bit of guidance,

I have a built rb26 forged bottom end stock piston size nur block.

Head is very ported 1mm over size valves

276 degree cam shafts billet

Vct custom cam set up off a rb25

hypertune plenum 

6 boost manifold 6266 gen2 pricision turbo,.Large enough fuel system to run e85

Just looking for where i would be at power wise i don t really want to run 40 psi or any thing as its a street car, I had around 480 awhp with my hks 25/30 twin turbo setup on a stock motor that threw a ring lan at powercruise a few years ago. I liked the response alot used to chop alot more powerfull cars due to response and grip.

 

Any one done this combo and have graphs or any idea where abouts id be at.

Boost is nearly irrelevant. Its timing and tuning. How much is blown out the exhaust @what deg. Of timing, manifold backpressures ect ect. You could theoretically run 100psi safely if the cam,crank,ignition and injection timing was to suit. Dont be afraid to run boost with these turbos. Ive found the couple ive had anything to do with like to be in the mid to high 30s or even 40s. 

17 hours ago, Gtir-keiron said:

rb26 forged bottom end stock piston size.

Head is very ported 1mm over size valves

276 degree cam shafts billet

Vct custom cam set up off a rb25

6 boost manifold 6266 gen2 pricision turbo,. e85

Just looking for where i would be at power wise

Turbine housing will be the deciding factor on your power figure, and response.  Eg. single scroll 0.84 will be way different from split pulse 1.15.

If you're limiting yourself to 2 bar, could range from 450 - 550kW.  Your rpm ceiling will also play a part in that figure. So there's a few variables.

 

The first and most obvious difference is complexity and cost.  Packaging/engineering difficulties being part of that situation.

The second and less easy to quantify with a dyno sheet is throttle feel and how it drives into boost or how it behaves on gear changes etc (different from how it runs at WOT).

Otherwise, the power figure will (should) be higher with a bigger housing simply because the engine can exhale more efficiently, lower backpressure, better scavenging, less retained heat etc etc. 

There are reasons to go with either approach, and quite a few traps that can prevent "best" outcome for each.

I'm currently engineering a 6266 0.8 single scroll 6boost setup onto a basic 30DET engine.  Knowing that engine performance is only a part of what makes the car go fast.

  • Like 2
4 hours ago, Dale FZ1 said:

Turbine housing will be the deciding factor on your power figure, and response.  Eg. single scroll 0.84 will be way different from split pulse 1.15.

If you're limiting yourself to 2 bar, could range from 450 - 550kW.  Your rpm ceiling will also play a part in that figure. So there's a few variables.

 

Its .84

split pulse manifold

  • 3 weeks later...

can anyone tell me where the best deals are being done on a 6466 nowadays?

I am wanting to try a 6466 on our engine and see if it makes more power than the 6766 we currently have fitted to it.

Would a 6466 with a .8 rear make over 500rwkw? The 6766 is a 1.0 rear, T4 split pulse on a genuine GReddy exhaust manifold.

The car is tuned by Unirgroup and is currently making 460/480rwkw at 30psi. Runs 138mph consistently

Wouldn't it be healthier to run the 6466 with the current 1.00 rear? It's such a large snail, don't stick a cork up its ass and run the peanut 0.84. In AND out!

Why is it "only" making 480 on 30 psi? Sounds kinda low given boost and turbo size. Possible issues/restrictions in the setup?

  • Like 1

curiosity more than anything mate. i am sure the ass end of both turbo's would be interchangeable so if the 6466 struggled too badly with a .8 ass we could throw the 1.0 on and do some more testing. 

As you can see in this post there are cars making more power with a smaller turbo though i am led to believe the 6766 isnt best suited to an RB which may be our issue. It flows a bit more air but doesnt like the rpm side of things. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 8/9/2017 at 7:12 AM, SRS13 said:

I haven't posted the results of my 6466 on a SR22VET.

On the JEM dyno, it made 512rwk on 34psi with 34psi on board at 4300rpm (from memory).

Haven't run it at the creek yet.

Got a Dyno grpah?

Anyone used the PTE 6062 Gen 2 yet? I'm currently converting from Sr20det to Vet and seems to fit the bill nicely between the 58 and 62 series range, (Currently making 410rwkw on a 5858)

Kinda surprising the Gen 2 6062 is rated 50hp higher than the Gen 1 6262

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...