Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 11/07/2022 at 12:13 PM, R377 said:

Thanks Lith, i haven't been on here for a few years now.

Always looking at street sensible (budget) RB25s.

From memory the 5858 sounded familar and also the 6262.  Quite a few yanks had some good results on their Evo / WRX.

Just looking at the Precision website, what are the new "gun" turbos ?

GEN2 PT5558 – 650hp

GEN2 PT5862 – 700hp

GEN2 PT6062 – 750hp

All good.

I'm not super super familiar with those tbh, I'm not going to bring up other turbos in a thread about Precisions but my opinion is that the Precision turbos really start starting to come into their own from the 64mm+ sizes - usually when you're looking at 75lb/min or less flowing turbos the aim is typically something that is geared towards being more snappy underfoot and the Precisions aren't necessarily famous for their transient response, at least compared to newer releases some other brands.   

I do know those 3 have been out for a few years now already, and I have at least heard the 6062 is a solid performer in it's own right - makes good power for a 60mm turbo and not particularly laggy.  Suggesting that I feel there are better options in no means I think they're nuggets :)

  • Like 2
  • 8 months later...

anyone found any 6062 results? having a poke around and they dont seem to exist from reliable resources in Australia.  

going to scale down from 6466 to 6062, also dropping cam size to pick up more downlow for rallysprint but just trying to make sure we are making the right move.  

 

 

  • 5 months later...

Thought I'd bump this thread as Precision have been superceding their Gen2 units with the  "NextGen" range and the updated 6266 and 6466 have just been released, rated at 925 (more than the Gen2 6466) and 1000hp respectively so decent improvements and probably most relevant to people who would be reading this.

 

The NextGen 6670 has also been released, kinda like a 6870 flow (quoted at 1100hp) but sitting between the 6466 and 6870 size wise.

  • Like 2

I have been keeping up to date with their releases. The one that still doesn’t make sense to me is the new 7275 being capable of making 1380hp especially considering the 7475 that replaced the old 7675 is only able to make 1350hp.
 

These are precisions claims of corse and no one has actually tried any of them or if they have, haven’t show the results 

44 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Fairly sure I've already seen a bonkers NextGen 7275 result, trying to think of where.  Could just be another Apex turbo result as those things are just mental 

Be interesting to see gen2 vs next gen 7275 on the same car and a couple of the sportsman’s against it as well 

Precision presented their new next gen 6466 yesterday. It's now rated to 1000hp vs the gen 2's 900hp rating. It's now available with either the S or HP cover. They mention that the cover has flow enhancements and I'm wondering if they will release the enhanced HP cover for the gen2's. 

Edited by TurboTapin
  • 3 weeks later...
On 28/09/2023 at 1:38 AM, TurboTapin said:

Precision presented their new next gen 6466 yesterday. It's now rated to 1000hp vs the gen 2's 900hp rating. It's now available with either the S or HP cover. They mention that the cover has flow enhancements and I'm wondering if they will release the enhanced HP cover for the gen2's. 

Is this based of the Mean Street Class Legal 6470 series turbos? If so, as much as i hate precisions due to the failures ive had, they will be a bonkers street turbo for the 3 litre guys if the same housing options exist.

4 hours ago, 33GTRV said:

Is this based of the Mean Street Class Legal 6470 series turbos? If so, as much as i hate precisions due to the failures ive had, they will be a bonkers street turbo for the 3 litre guys if the same housing options exist.

If you hate Precisions but like some of the "insane power vs turbo size" things maybe worth having a nosy at ApexTurbo, be super interesting to see something like one of their 64mm or so type units on an RB30.    They seem to be getting results that seem impossible, even when you consider the latest Precision offerings...  most significant Evo/Honda turbo records have already been picked up by things running ApexTurbos and one of the Honda guys "downgraded" from a bigger Precision turbo to a 62mm Apex to try and make it easier to get off the line and ended up making significantly more power at the same time, like they cracked 1000whp which is mad even on a US dyno without nitrous etc.

On 15/10/2023 at 8:40 AM, Komdotkom said:

Jesus the Apex Turbo website is terrible, I couldn't buy something with so little detail.

yeah, went looking for scientific purposes, and discovered that you need a degree in banging your nephson's sister to navigate. Pricey too the buggers

 

  • Haha 1
On 21/10/2023 at 3:52 PM, 33GTRV said:

yeah, went looking for scientific purposes, and discovered that you need a degree in banging your nephson's sister to navigate. Pricey too the buggers

 

I'm all for new products and manufacturers but they can't seriously expect to sell stuff with that type of information. Perhaps they sell through workshops who can demo the product on other cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...