Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well like I said its got a different wheel for greater flow instead of response.

I'll be driving this car for a while before I would be comfortably building it for any one in case of any problems. If this works out well we will be able to do that to all OP6 turbine housings.

For the time been we will still be carry with standard and .82 rear ended PU high flows.

i think the result is impressive and on par with alot of 3076 results.

its making nearly 200kw at the 4000rpm mark which is well and truly on par, and it ramps on nice. considering the final output is also near enough to 300kw, for something that will bolt on and be very close to stock like appearance, i think we have a few too many whingers in this thread.

please take note of my reference to the words 'i think' and note that it is my personal opinion that you are whingers, to which i am entitled :cool:

lets not forget the value either!

LOL! this power is unbeliaable guys. Soon this turbo will be on mine! Guys Tao took me for a drive in this with the turbo on and it was just AMAZING! it was so torquay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sure it wasn't queenscliff?

Another Dr-Drift dyno run cut off early...rev it harder Sam :ninja:

They are still nosing over after 5500 though stao...badly

Stao's rear tires are not the 'grippiest' and we have been fully booked out... I was just doing him a favour and squeezing in a few runs to see if we could monitor and control boost. If this was a full tune we would have certainly strapped it in, played with with cam timing, etc etc...

ok fair enough then :P

As said about though, it does look a little lazy coming onto boost..but that could just be the ramp rate aswel.

Ramp of 13kph/s

Awesome results, but i'm really concerned about the manifold pressures. I want to know if you guys are monitoring the manifold pressures whilst holding the gate closed with the actuator stopper? im worried about excessive pressure doing damage long term (exhaust valves and rear turbine).

Agreed, I've had many discussions with Stao regarding going beyond what I recommend, and to his credit he's prepared to push the limit, learn along the way, and try new ideas. I would certainly not recommend anyone to push these turbos, or any turbo to their limits, without carefull monitoring and understanding of vitals.

Sam.

This version of PU high flow plus the SS-2 prototype is an example of pushing few factors to its limit in exchange for the most out standing response, and power.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate, or 250rwkws with 18psi < 2500RPM of a SS-2 right?

Experience, Materials, workmanship, knowledge, data, and engineering define certain extension of limit. There are no full definition of limits, and nothing is physically impossible. So we'll keep cracking.

Also we've done lots of researches and evaluations in parts and components that made up those 2x turbos that takes the edge. I will evaluate it for 100,000KMs with some data analyse. If every thing turns out in great order as expected then I will have no holding back and let our customers enjoy the benefit of the new concepts.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate

bombtrack got 297 with an I/G hks 2835 (.68) with drop in cams on an unopened RB25 on pulp on the chasers dyno... that's pretty close :)

First of all Good work.

I've personally seen this turbo before it was installed. Since Stao does not want to reveal the wheel sizes, its a 500HP rated CHRA in a .63 turbine housing. Which we've also seen Garrett GT3582 600HP CHRA in .63 turbines.

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

If the components of the turbo is built to handle 20psi with decent tune then I don't believe it would cause any problems.

Edited by kwickr33

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

They are not talking about a drop in exhaust manifold pressure (that is what a wastegate effectively does to hold a consistent boost level). They are discussing too high exhaust manifold pressure caused by restricting the wastegate movement

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

I know what you are saying there, but if the pressure cant escape fast enough (too much pressure in the turbine hosuing itself) than it will slow, due to the exhaust gas almost coming to a standstill because it has no where to go.

Which comes down to the turbine exducer sizing, dump pipes, wheel trims etc.

I cant see the exhaust gas coming to a standstill, it would be near supersonic. I see it as maximizing the turbo as the turbine will be at its maximum shaft speed. Yes it would be better to go to a larger housing but you pay the penalty of lag and that affects the best part of the powerband. How often are you at 7000 revs anyway?

So how much pressure is too much and how do you measure it? Perhaps it is good when the stock wastegates drop boost.

Yeah you can't see what the back pressure is doing by looking at a dyno plot - sometimes it can show up as the power falling over prematurely due to the tuner having to pull timing to avoid detonation before MBT. Funnily enough this dyno plot looks like what you could expect to see in that case, if it weren't for the claim that the early drop off is due to wheelspin. Silly rolling road dynos...

Will be interesting to see how it goes on a hub dyno, and how the engine/turbo lasts at that power level if its going to be used on the track at the power level at all?

At face value, very nice power level and spool for a convenient and affordable package :D

Didn't Mafia make over 300wkw with a .63a/r GT3076R?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...