Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ever wondering if your speedo is accurate?

So far Ive been in 2x Stagea's (mine and a mates) and both speedo's were out by 10%.

So for every 10km/h on the clock it was out by 1km/h...

Note: This was with FACTORY Spec Tyre Dimentions + Factory Alloys.

Ie: 10Km/h(clock) = 9km/h(Real Time) & 110km/h(clock) = 100km/h(Real Time)

I noticed when I used to hit Speed Cut at 180km/h.. Navman would be Register 170km/h.

Someone once told me that Nissan did this so you didnt speed? and its only till 100km/h(Real Time)

as very few free/highways exceed this speed.

Cheers, Aerron

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327028-speedo-calibration/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Most cars speedometers - not just Nissans - will err on the side of over-reading (reading higher than the road-speed).

From what I understand, speedometer accuracy is a tricky business for car manufacters. They need to allow for things like:

* Tyre wear

* Tyre temperature

* Variations in factory-released tyre rim sizes in a single model (where all models share the same speedometer and sensor)

As soon as you start introducing non-factory components like aftermarket rims & changes in the overall diameter of the wheel (different tyre profiles, widths, etc) you introduce even more variables that may affect your speedometer accuracy. The manufacturer will typically provide a tyre placard which lists acceptable tyre rim/tyre sizes for your car - it's up to the owner to ensure that they keep the rolling diameter as close to this as possible to try and avoid upsetting the speedometer accuracy. (Though there are state-by-state laws regarding how much the rolling diameter can be too).

There are regulations under the ADRs regarding speedometer accuracy. These have since changed in - I think - 2006 to be even more stringent, but for most of us it's still under the older rule that it must be accurate within +-10%. From what I recall, the new rules prevent any under-reading, and allow for over-reading of up to 4kph + 10%.

Testing against GPS, both of my cars over-read, but even at 100kph it's only 1-2kph out - so I don't stress too much.

Anyway, hope that helps :)

Most cars speedometers - not just Nissans - will err on the side of over-reading (reading higher than the road-speed).

From what I understand, speedometer accuracy is a tricky business for car manufacters. They need to allow for things like:

* Tyre wear

* Tyre temperature

* Variations in factory-released tyre rim sizes in a single model (where all models share the same speedometer and sensor)

As soon as you start introducing non-factory components like aftermarket rims & changes in the overall diameter of the wheel (different tyre profiles, widths, etc) you introduce even more variables that may affect your speedometer accuracy. The manufacturer will typically provide a tyre placard which lists acceptable tyre rim/tyre sizes for your car - it's up to the owner to ensure that they keep the rolling diameter as close to this as possible to try and avoid upsetting the speedometer accuracy. (Though there are state-by-state laws regarding how much the rolling diameter can be too).

There are regulations under the ADRs regarding speedometer accuracy. These have since changed in - I think - 2006 to be even more stringent, but for most of us it's still under the older rule that it must be accurate within +-10%. From what I recall, the new rules prevent any under-reading, and allow for over-reading of up to 4kph + 10%.

Testing against GPS, both of my cars over-read, but even at 100kph it's only 1-2kph out - so I don't stress too much.

Anyway, hope that helps :rofl:

I wasnt so much stressing, more so curious :)

You did bring up alot of good points...

My partner works for Toyota, she was telling me recently that all staff were warned that the new Tarago's speedo can be inaccurate by Approx 20km/h :) ... I was rather shocked.

Toyota... a leading manufacturer could be that far off. Fresh out of the box even?

But it is a Luck the Draw so 1-2% of the production could be wrong.

I bring this subject up as I went for a VERY EARLY Sunday Morning blat to stretch the Stag's legs out.

(Yes I know its dangerous to me and others etc... so smack me down if you will)

I was reading Navman's Speed as I did so, noticed that the Stags needle was above the Odometer(roughly 5 o'clock) and the Navman only said 190km/h... So I continued onto 205km/h.

I know using Nissan Consult you can re-calibrate a R33's Spedometer. Is it possible in the 34's/Stagea?

Cheers

Edited by JDM_Spirit

Mines out and over, 245/40R18 on 18x9.5' on RS4S (max std 215/50R17)

IE: needle - 110kmh pfc - 106kmh gps - 105kmh,

needle - 120kmh pfc - 114kmh gps - 113kmh

Power FC display is even different to needle but more accurate.

both of my stageas have over-read the speed. When the GPS reads 100km/h the speedo usually says about 108km/h.

Its a bit less than 10% but it means if I sit at 65km/h via the needle I'm actually doing about ~60km/h - most of the time i sit closer to 60...but the extra leeway has saved me from a fine more than once.

^^^^ This was on a private road... Right?
I should bloody well hope so!

:P ... Well.... technically I drove on a piece of My Road as part of my Tax and Rego paid for it.

Im running 17's with 500km old 235/45R17's.

GPS : 110km/h Needle = 117km/h ish

i would sit at

50 speedo , 45 real time.

90 speedo, 80 real time.

116 speedo , 100 real time.

so i couldnt work it out haha, sold the car the new owner put 20's on it and said its only like 3ks off now all round, according to his GPS

Pretty much all cars are set up to be out. Brand new camry's have the correct reading at the ECU but then change it for the speedo to be 10% out, don't ask me why, they just do. but it explains why camry drivers always seem to go so slow.

Mines out and over, 245/40R18 on 18x9.5' on RS4S (max std 215/50R17)

IE: needle - 110kmh pfc - 106kmh gps - 105kmh,

needle - 120kmh pfc - 114kmh gps - 113kmh

Power FC display is even different to needle but more accurate.

That's probably due to the extra stretch your tyres have made to go over the 9.5"rims, as I have exactly the same size tyres on my car, but on 18x8" rims, and it's only aout 1km/h out.

My PowerFC is way off both the speedo and actual real-time speed my car is travelling at.

with my ecutalk and gps i get 3 different speeds

the ecutalk over reads the ground speed and the dash shows more than that again

and as somone said, its pretty accurate up to about 80 (both dash and ecu are in sync) then they start to separate

anyone used the jaycar speed corrector kit?

8-10% over-read. Means it has more kms on the clock than it has done!

Mines out about 7%. Trip to work in my Magna is 114km and the Stagea is 122km. 18" Advant T7s with 225/45 with rolling diameter of 2072.5mm whereas standard is 215/55x17" so rolling diameter is 2099.5mm. So smaller by 27mm hence more km on the odometer.

Mines out about 7%. Trip to work in my Magna is 114km and the Stagea is 122km. 18" Advant T7s with 225/45 with rolling diameter of 2072.5mm whereas standard is 215/55x17"

I run 245/45/18 and my error is approx 3% against GPS, which I'm quite happy with. Where in the mountains are you Rosella? I'm at Faulconbridge, I'll have to keep my eyes peeled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...