Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didnt dare say the BOOST threshold was the same, but I did talk about the character and used the word threshold loosely at best (read as a descriptive word).

They both shine to the same level at 4000rpm, with a similar curve (albeit one with less power within) prior to that point.

What I am saying is, they both boogie about the same when on power, and the period before being 'on power' is similar enough in character that it would not make for an enormous level of difference below 4000rpm.

While the boost is on earlier, I dont think that necessarily means very much when we have back to back direct comparisons of power and torque. I wont go into reasons why so not to offend you (read you know full well why and better than I do).

All in all considering the 'space age' materials used and the suggested market this size is aimed at its not all that special that it stands up and has a similar curve at a similar point to a 3076. It actually brings to light that a 3076 is still a good thing even on todays terms, with these special things out there.

If that hasnt cleared up whats bugging you about my comments then I dont know what will.

I think the real 'pro's' of the EFR series is more in transient response, considering the hype around their low-mass turbine wheels. Something which wouldn't really show on a dyno. Back in regards to the 7163, I can't remember if this has already been posted or not, but here is a link for a Perrin (read: Subaru engine) test showing a comparo on the 7163 with various other EFR and GT/GTX turbos. Great read and nice pretty pictures :D

http://blog.perrinperformance.com/borg-warner-efr-7163-test-and-tune/

Considering these were all done on a Subaru (which have, IMHO, a poor engine), and with a [relatively] low boost pressure, I think these are great results for a turbo that is capable of 300+rwkw. I mean, seriously, 15psi at 3K, and full boost (in this case 25psi) before 3.5K ... That's awesome.

I was also reading on the Honda s2K forums that the 7163 comes with an aluminium bearing housing; would this be for both weight/friction, or one or the other? As a street package on a stroked RB (2.8), with a big exhaust A/R in TS form (I think it is 1.01?), would be plenty responsive, while still being able to push 350+rwkw on E85. Add to that a nice shot of laughing gas, and you'll have one hell of a responsive 10 - 11 second car. (Or at least I hope)

Can't wait to place my order for one of these... *drools*

EDIT: Sorry guys, I can't seem to edit-out all the html type coding.. It wont save with the changes.. Any ideas? :S

EDIT EDIT: Ok, figured it out. Anyone else having troubles with the posting of posts?

Edited by Dajae
I sporadically have issues, yes - and the post you just put up was detail the exact results which GTScoTT was rambling about being not that impressive :)

I just looked back through the thread and realised you and GTScoTT were talking about this very same thing. Oops. Here I thought my little search in google was good.... lol.

Well, I find them impressive to a point... All things being considered. Not ground breaking, or a huge game changer, but still impressive.

They would have been game changing if there weren't already things fancier than the old GT-series etc already lurking around. Given that the actual response, not boost threshold which is meant to be the impressive things with these things... suggests that when you consider even the threshold looks good - they are potentially a VERY good thing.

whats the use of boost being on earlier if its not making more power too?

Im not saying its NOT making more power, im saying the amount more power isnt blowing me away. Regardless of when the boost comes on.

whats the use of boost being on earlier if its not making more power too?

I understand what you are saying.

If the response is as good as reported (like Lith is saying) and they don't grenade themselves they should be a good thing when more filter down here and we get more local results.

whats the Im not saying its NOT making more power, im saying the amount more power isnt blowing me away. Regardless of when the boost comes on.

The amount more power its making is pretty much proportionate to how much more boost its making. There is no magic, what bewilders me is that you have been far more impressed at far less impressive results.

i guess im more impressed when someone brings a total budget item to the market and it performs as it should, or when a little engineering company sprouts and continually raises the bar in many ways. that is impressive for me.

its a personal thing.. with the hype of the EFR and the technology involved, teething problems, wait times, etc.. id just have hoped they would blow anything current out of the water.

i guess ive set my own expectations lith, and unfortunately the EFR's arent living up to what I had personally hoped. thats all.

Fair enough. I set reasonably realistic expectations and will call a stick a stick - when the EFRs were looking shxt (failing etc) I called it that, but I also realise you get decreasing gains in this kind of area. Thats why the EFRs are clearly targetted at those who want to be the "top", its not going to be proportionally more awesome... its just going to be the thing that provides the edge. The whole technology hasn't been completely re-invented, they're just trying to use the best realistic features of existing technology to provide something high level to the masses.

Well that's the way I see it anyway.

The only turbo technology I can see possibly changing the way we look at things substantially in terms of turbo choice if it goes smoothly may be the Garrett Dual Boost stuff.

I agree your way of looking at it is more realistic, and probably entirely accurate. call me childish but i had higher hopes.

try jump on MSN soon, Id love to theorise with you over some PT5558 SR goodness. Have CP pistons at DET comp being match bored as we speak :)

Hi, Lith posted up my prelimiary tune graphs, Thought I would jump in here.

Well I'm pretty happy with the results of my EFR8374 so far, If I can get rid of some of the back pressure issues we are having we should be able to dial it up a bit more.

I have just got one of the Forge Motorsports Dual Port W/G's to try, Going dual port is generally recomended when high back pressure is a issue (We are struggling to keep the WG flap closed past 20psi), But if we dial up to 25ish psi we should get close if not on 500kw at the wheels on pump gas.

I'm yet to drive the car (It's at the body shop getting the guards pumped) but going from what the tuner has commented on it.....It should be awesome fun!

500+kW is a good effort! Plans for e85 at all? I have heard and read that the Forge Motorsports Dual Port Wastegate leaves quite a bit to be desired? Mostly off the suby forums and their experiences, nothing first hand..

No plans at this stage for E85, It is still a street car. If I could get it at the pump I would change.

What are they saying about the Forge W/G? Would be interested to hear?

I'll have to find the forum thread to reference properly, but IIRC, it had to do with the design and the way in which it holds pressure. Or rather, doesnt hold pressure.. Like a lot of things though, it had mixed reviews. Some swore by it, but the OP of that thread definitely wasnt happy. When I get to work I'll attempt to dig it up :)

I have no idea how that quick spool valve would be set up to actually work. They should only work with divided turbine housings and NON-divided manifolds. U can't just block off 3 cyliders until you're on full boost.

Does anybody know how this one would work and the benefit?

Edit: I think I get it now. The valve must direct the gas from one side into the other sie of the turbine housing.

Edited by bradsm87

yeah i would say the flap is actually the divider.. which blocks one side and opens the dividing area so gas can pass through to the other split.

nifty, but i dont like it lol.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...