Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol. Thanks for eveyones advice. I'll go with bigger injectors without fuel rail. What else do you suggest? I have to be AFMless. Do I just readd it to the piping to add a bot of an illusion? How is everyone getting away with mods. Eg how are you doing it?

Why does it have to be AFM less? Cause that along with ECU will definitely fail an inspection, if you aren't worried then sure, but personally I would stress about it everyday if it was my car.

Why does it have to be AFM less? Cause that along with ECU will definitely fail an inspection, if you aren't worried then sure, but personally I would stress about it everyday if it was my car.

Im running a link ecu. It doesn't use AFM.

So leave an AFM there, plugged in.

Who cares if it doesnt do anything.

Doesnt seem overly hard to me?!

Obviously lol. That's the first thing. But if they start to pull plugs n try to get it to stall I'm boned. There are some highly modified cars on here. Everyone telling me they constantly get dicked?

Obviously lol. That's the first thing. But if they start to pull plugs n try to get it to stall I'm boned. There are some highly modified cars on here. Everyone telling me they constantly get dicked?

Wire the afm up via a relay to the ignitor ground or something, car will still crank but won't start, I've seen people do it before including a whole fake loom for the ecu lol.

Wire the afm up via a relay to the ignitor ground or something, car will still crank but won't start, I've seen people do it before including a whole fake loom for the ecu lol.

Haha. But surely everyone doesn't have to do this for their cars??!!

That's cause you don't live in Vic ya penis.

AFM has always been easy for the EPA, start car, pull plug. Car should run rough and die if rev'd. If it doesn't, instant fail :)

But anyway, this is far off track now. Plenty of threads in the Vic area. And therest is just common sense (like using a factory fuel rail and airbox that offer no benefit by changing em in the first place).

That's cause you don't live in Vic ya penis.

AFM has always been easy for the EPA, start car, pull plug. Car should run rough and die if rev'd. If it doesn't, instant fail :)

But anyway, this is far off track now. Plenty of threads in the Vic area. And therest is just common sense (like using a factory fuel rail and airbox that offer no benefit by changing em in the first place).

Needed to change factory box cos of my Intercooler piping.

Anywho yeh off topic now. :)

  • 2 weeks later...

I ordered my GTX3071 from the US over a week ago and just found out there is at least another 2 week wait for Garrett to supply it. Apparently Garrett underestimated demand and are scrambling to manufacture more. I may just get the GT3076 sent over but is there a better option? I am stuck with the 60mm rear wheel as I have a Tial 0.82 housing coming over too.

Perhaps the GTX3076 would do nicely, anyone have dyno results from one yet? I have a 4000 stall and would like most of the boost on by then preferably.

76 for sure!

Nil stock of any GTX turbos... 2 week wait at least.

It looks like people are keen to try the new range out. I think I will wait and just shove the stock turbo back in for now. :yucky: I wonder how 1000cc injectors on e85 will work. lol.

  • 2 weeks later...

Today I went down to GCG to see if they had any info on GTX low mounts for GTR's. No idea if or when they will be released. Rubbish.... absolute crap that is!

yea that is crap, i want some -5's

modern bolt on gtr lowmounts would be a godsend, even if oil lines etc didn't connect easily

I want -10 power with -5 response

>:(

Ha. Yeah I said i am running RS's/-10's and straight away he said 'ah yes. The laggy choof choof surging monsters' He got it in one!!!

No idea who I spoke to. A guy roughly mid 30's, blonde hair, medium to large build. When I asked about GTX wheel low mounts for a GTR he asked me if I had any info on them.... as they have NONE.

GARRETT GET OFF YOUR ARSE!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...