Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FI are still yet to launch their new car thats why it looks the sam, same for Virgin and Mclaren, although I find it weird that Virgin have a fully connected shark fin in that pic even though they never had one last year and they are banned for 2011.

FI are still yet to launch their new car thats why it looks the sam, same for Virgin and Mclaren, although I find it weird that Virgin have a fully connected shark fin in that pic even though they never had one last year and they are banned for 2011.

Red bull seem to have a shark fin type thing.. however it doesnt extend all the way back, more cheekyness from adrian newy?

Red bull seem to have a shark fin type thing.. however it doesnt extend all the way back, more cheekyness from adrian newy?

I read somewhere that the Red Bull shark fin extends to the absolute maximum that the regs will allow, leaving only the minimal gap required, surprising to see that they are the only ones to really to do it yet.

thanks for the pics. wow. some of the cars are really radically changed compared to last year. which I guess is to be expected given the regs. look at the front wings. my god could they get any more complex? not much chop when you bang wheels with kobayashi and loose half ya 'bits' on the first lap though...

These were a couple I used last year:

http://www.vipstand.me/

http://www.tvkorner.com/

Good for watching practices and quali's and having on the laptop for when channel one goes to commercial, but neither were tv quality picture.

The new Pirellis dont that THAT bad on the McLaren, sure white or red would suit better but its still not exactly an ugly look

They just have large signage on the launch & test cars so everyone knows who the tyres belong to. By the time they start racing properly the tyres will be covered in black so you wont even notice the branding. Hell half the time it was near on impossible to pick who was on what tyre anyway.

Anyway McLarens look better in orange so who really cares.

Edited by djr81

Check out the 3D model of the MP4-26 on the McLaren racing site; Serious looking exhaust blown wing setup. Looks to be supplemented by some scoopage near the airbox inlet.

Now let's see the relative PACE!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...