Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LH talking about RBR on F1.com

You can see this weekend, I was quickest in the first sector and the last sector, but we lose a lot in the middle sector, and that’s because we don’t have a DRS system as efficient as theirs, so I think that we will lose at least half of those four tenths in the middle sector. If we can improve in that area, then I think we could definitely eke ahead of them, so that’s what we need to work on.

Like WTF LH?? Why was MW 4/10ths to 5/10ths faster in this sector when he was leading the race? No DRS deployed when leading so maybe something to do with where he spends his KERS and car setup characteristics.

I haven't seen RBR get the same straight line advantage that Maclaren gets when DRS is open and why was the Maclaren so much faster in S1?

Methinks he doth protest too much.

His car is quick enough to win races, so shut up and get on with it....

LH talking about RBR on F1.com

Like WTF LH?? Why was MW 4/10ths to 5/10ths faster in this sector when he was leading the race? No DRS deployed when leading so maybe something to do with where he spends his KERS and car setup characteristics.

I haven't seen RBR get the same straight line advantage that Maclaren gets when DRS is open and why was the Maclaren so much faster in S1?

Methinks he doth protest too much.

His car is quick enough to win races, so shut up and get on with it....

agreed. he's a whinger and a bullshit artirst. I was looking at the top speeds in each sector. funnily enough neither RBR was in the top 6 fastest cars in S1, they were in S2 but so was hamilton and guess what? all top 6 cars were equal at 214km/h, S3 again no RBR in the top 6. speed trap was the same story with maclaren miles ahead of RBR (and again no RBR in top 6, fastest from memory was - and often is - the mercedes of schumacher). in a straight line it's plain to see big mac have more speed than RBR and with DRS he gap between them is worse. like you say webber was consistently 3-5 tenths quicker in S2 regardless of being in the DRS zone or not.

even a simpleton can see that RBR employ a higher drag set-up which gives them the edge in corner speed and overall laptimes whilst maclaren have a lower drag/lower downforce set-up which puts them about even or a bees dick behind in outright pace, slower in the fast corners but quite a bit faster down the straights. the other possible explanation is the mercedes engine vs the customer renault engines RBR use but I think it's mostly a set-up thing and just they go about their racing slightly differently.

i agree. these days I would say the maclaren is on terms with the RBR and if I had to choose which one to race I would be tempted to take the maclaren as that extra top speed makes passing a fair bit easier and defending easier too. high corner speed and good lap times is nice but no one is passing mid corner round the outside with their superior aero... it's all done on the straights on the power and DRS or into the braking zones. RBR's obvious advantage is in qualy where only lap times count.

I am hoping SV isn't on the pace again. He was a bit irritable after Silverstone, this weekend did nothing for his ego so a third weekend will have the little violins cranking.

The Fez might be a very good chance of getting away with a silver dinner plate this week.

Is it just me or would anyone else like to see the balance of the option and prime tyres tweaked so that it is feasible to run the harder tyre for more time without losing bucketloads of time? I would like to see the leading drivers on different strategies.

Funny we got one of the best races of the year after Pirelli make a good tyre. Apparently their compeditors on europe have been advertising how bad their tyres are because of what's going on in F1.

We need the tyre wars back

Edited by sav man

ive been trying to find in the rules if it is possible to run the differant compounds front and back? this would add something differant if cars treated the tyres well at differant ends of the carsoft at front and hard at the back to encourage a bit more slide or otherway round for more under stear. if anyone could find an answer that would be good

Seb still has a very comfortable lead but seems to be rattled a bit easier in the last couple of races. I couldn't believe when he was down in 9 or 10 at one stage before he had even pitted. I have really been hoping for a turning point for Mark but unless he now wins a few he may run out of races to earn enough points.

Bring back refueling.

Agreed

We need the tyre wars back

Agreed

Is it just me or is anyone else excited about the 4 cyl turbo engines to come in over the next couple of years.

I liked how DRS had virtually no bearing on the race's outcome.

harry has really made me HATE the DRS bullshit.

Watching LH, MW, and FA dicing was majic. all great drivers, all showing their talent and ability to race without touching.

Schumi's "drift".... was wicked, if only he stayed off the throttle a little longer it would have been Gif-worthy :P

Mattr - There is a rule on it, the compound has to be the same front and rear.

GTR fan - You will be waiting a long time for the 4 cylinder engines, they are now going to be V6's.

Marlin - I agree with the dice between the three, SV should be forced to sit down and watch that as an example of how to drive in traffic.

was a bit peeved at rbr's pit strategy with mark, you'd think they'd make the jump first after seeing one of the drivers in 10th or there abouts putting in good times..

he may have not finished 1st or 2nd but it would have made for a little bit moar excite at the end..

should be a good race for webber this weekend..

From Grand Prix Week

Our spies in the Red Bull

motorhome tell us that despite

informing the world at large that

he wasn’t disappointed with P3 in

qualifying, Sebastian Vettel may

have been in tears after the press

conference ...

When I first started to read it, I was expecting it to be a poem.

I can see it being true though, so :teehee:

Funny we got one of the best races of the year after Pirelli make a good tyre. Apparently their compeditors on europe have been advertising how bad their tyres are because of what's going on in F1.

We need the tyre wars back

Pirelli confirmed the tyres are unchanged. Its the track & conditions that made the difference to tyre performance in Germany.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...