Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Still shows that there arent any restrictions ;)

Realistically I think the 20G would just about suit anyone wanting a balls out responsive 260rwkw, maybe more.

I think it would better HKS GTRS results to be honest, thats $3000 worth of kit to be had for $800 on ebay.

Still shows that there arent any restrictions ;)

Realistically I think the 20G would just about suit anyone wanting a balls out responsive 260rwkw, maybe more.

I think it would better HKS GTRS results to be honest, thats $3000 worth of kit to be had for $800 on ebay.

this. i'd definately try it if i didn't already have a 2835!

Yeah the TD06SL2 has the same exhaust wheel and housing as a T67 but with 20g compressor and housing to suit. I would still think a T67 would be better on a RB25 and the SL2 for a RB20

410kw was a little bit of a piss take with correction on... More realistically it makes 390kw on a hub dyno and 360rwkw on a dyno dynamics roller :)

I notice you run a Z32 AFM in the cooler piping, do you run a 4" intake off the T67?

I notice you run a Z32 AFM in the cooler piping, do you run a 4" intake off the T67?

Yes, there should be engine bay shots somewhere in this thread...

Actually I blew a the silicon off the AFM on friday night which was a bitch. The only pipe that can't have welded tabs to hold the hose clamp on (because it's plastic) dammit!

In other news, drags tomorrow night. Won't be a good time I don't think because the standard suspension can't be refitted due to alignment changes but will raise my coilovers and use MT ET street and see what mph I can run at least

Edited by SimonR32

Simon - I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Remember our $ is weak as anything compared to yours if you freak at the price..

I did some road tuning on an R34 RB25DET powered R32 yesterday which is running some Chinese T3/T4 and found the thing was maxed out at 1.1bar, the owner wants 300wkw on pump gas with streetability but like everyone doesn't want to spend thousands - was thinking of suggesting this turbo as an option with 10cm housing if its anything like yours:

http://www.drivenperformance.co.nz/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=1810

Simon - I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Remember our $ is weak as anything compared to yours if you freak at the price..

I did some road tuning on an R34 RB25DET powered R32 yesterday which is running some Chinese T3/T4 and found the thing was maxed out at 1.1bar, the owner wants 300wkw on pump gas with streetability but like everyone doesn't want to spend thousands - was thinking of suggesting this turbo as an option with 10cm housing if its anything like yours:

http://www.drivenperformance.co.nz/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=1810

I was in Auckland a few weeks ago so I know what your dollar is like (actually I took money from your economy because I won like $350 at the casino during a 15 hour stopover haha)

That turbo has the same badge as mine (Kinugawa) so it would be manufactured in the same place and I imagine would be just as good quality but it's not the same specs. It has a much bigger exhaust wheel and a different trimmed front wheel. Plus the front housing is different as well.

That is not the one to buy... You can buy the same as mine from ebay http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Turbochargeri-Kinugawa-T67-25G-T3-10-cm-V-Band-Housing-/270717916046?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f080b938e#ht_2530wt_1139 or do what I did and email them direct and ask for the best price [email protected] then pay via paypal!

It only took 3-4 days to get mine delivered so it's nice and quick and I got it for about $100 off the ebay price :)

this. i'd definately try it if i didn't already have a 2835!

Exactly, this is my answer to the 2835 which I cannot find/afford. Just reference the two states sources, Simons T67 results (for hot side) and all evo 20g results (for power/response indication).

Power and response can ONLY be better going up to a 2.5L limited by the exhaust side choking, enter Simons results.

We have a winner.

Once Im back from my first overseas trip ever, Ill be buying one. Best thing is that even if Kando fold up, mitsu sell all their tooling from panels to turbos so there are more suppliers of mitsubishi turbo parts than you can poke a stick at.

Hyundai motors are all ex mitsu tooling, which is why a hyundai motor is the cheapest way to do a 4G63 conversion lol.

Yes, there should be engine bay shots somewhere in this thread...

Actually I blew a the silicon off the AFM on friday night which was a bitch. The only pipe that can't have welded tabs to hold the hose clamp on (because it's plastic) dammit!

In other news, drags tomorrow night. Won't be a good time I don't think because the standard suspension can't be refitted due to alignment changes but will raise my coilovers and use MT ET street and see what mph I can run at least

Dont be too stressed about coilovers. My old drift

S13 ran 11.0 @127mph on full drift setup. And had used mt et streets. 1.65 60ft launch.

Exactly, this is my answer to the 2835 which I cannot find/afford. Just reference the two states sources, Simons T67 results (for hot side) and all evo 20g results (for power/response indication).

Power and response can ONLY be better going up to a 2.5L limited by the exhaust side choking, enter Simons results.

How is the T67 the answer to the HKS 2835? I thought they would be in different categories. The dynosheets in post #154 show that it is less responsive than a 3076. The 2835 is more responsive than a 3076 again. In the HKS range I would equate it closer to a 3037.

2835 full boost ~3500rpm

3076 full boost ~3800-4000rpm

T67 full boost 4200-4400rpm

How is the T67 the answer to the HKS 2835? I thought they would be in different categories. The dynosheets in post #154 show that it is less responsive than a 3076. The 2835 is more responsive than a 3076 again. In the HKS range I would equate it closer to a 3037.

2835 full boost ~3500rpm

3076 full boost ~3800-4000rpm

T67 full boost 4200-4400rpm

I believe they are talking about the TD06SL2

I believe they are talking about the TD06SL2

Its the same thing, TD06SL2 and T67 are refering to the turbine wheel. Its the same wheel. Same size same design etc.

When trust do their thing and rebadge the turbo as their own they call the TD06SL2 wheel a T67. Generally because it was trust who mated it to a 25G compressor and called it a T67, not Mitsubishi.

To he who questioned how it applies to a 2835, I have clearly stated the 20g compressor mated to the SL2 turbine wheel (T67) has been shown to spool incredibly well on a 2L motor when using a 10.5cm housing. The SL2 has also been shown to flow very high numbers, with ease, on simons car.

The 20g compressor is 68mm, it is smaller and in theory will spool faster than the 71mm GT35 used on the 2835 and 3071. It also flows 450hp.

2 and 2 somehow make 4, Im just waiting to secure my own 20g and proove the theory on paper. Hopefully will order one next week.

Be a little carefull comparing Evolution Mitsy turbos to other MHI based things because the Evos 4-10 use twin scroll turbine housings and thats makes a significant difference .

Possibly the people to talk to are GT Pumps because they seem to have a good handle on the various Mitsubishi 6 series turbines and TD05/6/7 compressor wheels .

You will find an interesting mix of TD06 family turbines ie TD06-SL2 TD06 TD06S TD06H TD06SH and TE06 .

They can have from memory 11 or 12 blades and I think Mark has most/all on display at his shop .

Where Mitsy is different from Garretts GT BB wheel rage seems to be with trim sizes . To me it looks like Garrett leaned towards big turbine trim sizes and at times compressors too . HKS seemed to take advantage of optioning Garrett compressors of the same families but in smaller trims at times . Importantly they also - oops the signals have cleared and gotta go

More termorrer cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...